近场脉冲地动对钢筋混凝土剪力墙建筑抗震能力的影响

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mohsen Khademi , Mohsen Tehranizadeh , Amir Shirkhani , Iman Hajirasouliha , T.Y. Yang
{"title":"近场脉冲地动对钢筋混凝土剪力墙建筑抗震能力的影响","authors":"Mohsen Khademi ,&nbsp;Mohsen Tehranizadeh ,&nbsp;Amir Shirkhani ,&nbsp;Iman Hajirasouliha ,&nbsp;T.Y. Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the effects of near-field pulse-like earthquake ground motions (GMs) on the seismic resilience, repair cost and time, and structural collapse risk of low-to-high-rise selected multi-story RC structures with special moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) and shear walls. Selected 5-, 10-, and 15-story structures are designed based on a seismically active region where pulse-like GMs are more likely to occur. Two different sets of near-field GMs are chosen based on the recommendations of FEMA P-695 to conduct nonlinear dynamic analyses. Subsequently, the methodology provided in FEMA P-58 is adopted to perform a comprehensive seismic performance assessment at various hazard levels. It is shown that the consideration of the effects of near-field pulse-like GMs can considerably increase the risk of structural collapse in RC shear wall systems, based on the ratio of the pulse period of ground motion records to the elastic first mode period, in comparison to the near-field GMs without a pulse. It is concluded that the stated ratio is a crucial parameter to assess the risk to the life safety (LS) of low-to-high-rise RC buildings. For frequently occurring seismic intensities, repairable damage to nonstructural elements is the main factor contributing to the total expected economic loss in the studied buildings, irrespective of the selected GM set and the number of stories. In addition, the contribution of collapse and demolition due to residual drift in the estimation of repair time is significant for pulse-like GMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 107585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of near-field pulse-like ground motions on the seismic resilience of RC shear wall buildings\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Khademi ,&nbsp;Mohsen Tehranizadeh ,&nbsp;Amir Shirkhani ,&nbsp;Iman Hajirasouliha ,&nbsp;T.Y. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the effects of near-field pulse-like earthquake ground motions (GMs) on the seismic resilience, repair cost and time, and structural collapse risk of low-to-high-rise selected multi-story RC structures with special moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) and shear walls. Selected 5-, 10-, and 15-story structures are designed based on a seismically active region where pulse-like GMs are more likely to occur. Two different sets of near-field GMs are chosen based on the recommendations of FEMA P-695 to conduct nonlinear dynamic analyses. Subsequently, the methodology provided in FEMA P-58 is adopted to perform a comprehensive seismic performance assessment at various hazard levels. It is shown that the consideration of the effects of near-field pulse-like GMs can considerably increase the risk of structural collapse in RC shear wall systems, based on the ratio of the pulse period of ground motion records to the elastic first mode period, in comparison to the near-field GMs without a pulse. It is concluded that the stated ratio is a crucial parameter to assess the risk to the life safety (LS) of low-to-high-rise RC buildings. For frequently occurring seismic intensities, repairable damage to nonstructural elements is the main factor contributing to the total expected economic loss in the studied buildings, irrespective of the selected GM set and the number of stories. In addition, the contribution of collapse and demolition due to residual drift in the estimation of repair time is significant for pulse-like GMs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424017387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424017387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了近场脉冲样地震地面运动(GMs)对采用特殊矩抵抗框架(SMRFs)和剪力墙的低至高层选定多层 RC 结构的抗震性、维修成本和时间以及结构倒塌风险的影响。选定的 5 层、10 层和 15 层结构是根据地震活跃区域设计的,该区域更容易发生脉冲样 GM。根据 FEMA P-695 的建议,选择两组不同的近场 GMs 进行非线性动力分析。随后,采用 FEMA P-58 中提供的方法,在不同危险等级下进行综合地震性能评估。结果表明,根据地面运动记录的脉冲周期与弹性第一模态周期之比,与无脉冲的近场 GM 相比,考虑近场脉冲样 GM 的影响会大大增加 RC 剪力墙系统结构倒塌的风险。结论是,所述比率是评估低层至高层 RC 建筑生命安全(LS)风险的关键参数。对于频繁发生的地震烈度,非结构性构件的可修复损坏是造成所研究建筑预期总经济损失的主要因素,与所选的 GM 集和层数无关。此外,在估算修复时间时,残余漂移导致的倒塌和拆除对脉冲类地震烈度的影响也很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of near-field pulse-like ground motions on the seismic resilience of RC shear wall buildings
This paper examines the effects of near-field pulse-like earthquake ground motions (GMs) on the seismic resilience, repair cost and time, and structural collapse risk of low-to-high-rise selected multi-story RC structures with special moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) and shear walls. Selected 5-, 10-, and 15-story structures are designed based on a seismically active region where pulse-like GMs are more likely to occur. Two different sets of near-field GMs are chosen based on the recommendations of FEMA P-695 to conduct nonlinear dynamic analyses. Subsequently, the methodology provided in FEMA P-58 is adopted to perform a comprehensive seismic performance assessment at various hazard levels. It is shown that the consideration of the effects of near-field pulse-like GMs can considerably increase the risk of structural collapse in RC shear wall systems, based on the ratio of the pulse period of ground motion records to the elastic first mode period, in comparison to the near-field GMs without a pulse. It is concluded that the stated ratio is a crucial parameter to assess the risk to the life safety (LS) of low-to-high-rise RC buildings. For frequently occurring seismic intensities, repairable damage to nonstructural elements is the main factor contributing to the total expected economic loss in the studied buildings, irrespective of the selected GM set and the number of stories. In addition, the contribution of collapse and demolition due to residual drift in the estimation of repair time is significant for pulse-like GMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信