使用新型 HRB650E 高强度钢筋的桥墩抗震性能试验研究

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yong Li , Dezhang Sun , Junwu Dai
{"title":"使用新型 HRB650E 高强度钢筋的桥墩抗震性能试验研究","authors":"Yong Li ,&nbsp;Dezhang Sun ,&nbsp;Junwu Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To facilitate the application of high-strength steel in reinforced concrete bridge structures, this study explores the seismic performance of full-scale HRB650E high-strength reinforced concrete bridge piers. Initially, monotonic tensile tests were conducted on HRB400 and HRB650E steel rebars with the same slenderness ratio to analyze the differences in their mechanical properties. Subsequently, quasi-static cyclic tests were carried out on four square full-scale RC bridge piers to examine the influence of new high-strength rebars, stirrup ratios, and axial load ratios on the seismic performance. Based on the experimental results, a hysteresis model suitable for HRB650E reinforced concrete columns was developed. The findings indicate that the HRB650E steel bar exhibited lower uniform elongation and fracture elongation compared to HRB400 steel bar. The displacement at which HRB650E piers reached crack damage was 36 % higher than that of HRB400 piers, and they also showed lower residual displacements at all load levels. The maximum lateral load capacity and the ductility coefficient of HRB650E piers increased significantly compared to HRB400 piers. While the initial secant stiffness of both types was comparable, HRB650E piers exhibited a slower rate of stiffness degradation, resulting in higher secant stiffness at the ultimate state. They also demonstrated 35 % higher cumulative energy dissipation at the ultimate state. When the stirrup ratio of HRB650E piers was increased from 1.1 % to 1.7 %, there was a slight reduction in residual displacement, a small increase of the yield strength, and a minor improvement in the maximum lateral load capacity. Furthermore, a higher stirrup ratio was observed to improve energy dissipation levels at all loading stages. Increasing the axial load ratio of HRB650E piers from 0.1 to 0.2 allowed the piers to withstand greater deformations at the same repairable ultimate state, with significant increases in yield strength, maximum lateral load capacity, initial secant stiffness, and secant stiffness at the ultimate state, but a small increase in the cumulative energy dissipation. The hysteresis model for HRB650E RC columns, based on experimental data, exhibited good computational accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 107650"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on seismic performance of bridge pier with new HRB650E high-strength steel bar\",\"authors\":\"Yong Li ,&nbsp;Dezhang Sun ,&nbsp;Junwu Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To facilitate the application of high-strength steel in reinforced concrete bridge structures, this study explores the seismic performance of full-scale HRB650E high-strength reinforced concrete bridge piers. Initially, monotonic tensile tests were conducted on HRB400 and HRB650E steel rebars with the same slenderness ratio to analyze the differences in their mechanical properties. Subsequently, quasi-static cyclic tests were carried out on four square full-scale RC bridge piers to examine the influence of new high-strength rebars, stirrup ratios, and axial load ratios on the seismic performance. Based on the experimental results, a hysteresis model suitable for HRB650E reinforced concrete columns was developed. The findings indicate that the HRB650E steel bar exhibited lower uniform elongation and fracture elongation compared to HRB400 steel bar. The displacement at which HRB650E piers reached crack damage was 36 % higher than that of HRB400 piers, and they also showed lower residual displacements at all load levels. The maximum lateral load capacity and the ductility coefficient of HRB650E piers increased significantly compared to HRB400 piers. While the initial secant stiffness of both types was comparable, HRB650E piers exhibited a slower rate of stiffness degradation, resulting in higher secant stiffness at the ultimate state. They also demonstrated 35 % higher cumulative energy dissipation at the ultimate state. When the stirrup ratio of HRB650E piers was increased from 1.1 % to 1.7 %, there was a slight reduction in residual displacement, a small increase of the yield strength, and a minor improvement in the maximum lateral load capacity. Furthermore, a higher stirrup ratio was observed to improve energy dissipation levels at all loading stages. Increasing the axial load ratio of HRB650E piers from 0.1 to 0.2 allowed the piers to withstand greater deformations at the same repairable ultimate state, with significant increases in yield strength, maximum lateral load capacity, initial secant stiffness, and secant stiffness at the ultimate state, but a small increase in the cumulative energy dissipation. The hysteresis model for HRB650E RC columns, based on experimental data, exhibited good computational accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424018034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424018034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为促进高强度钢在钢筋混凝土桥梁结构中的应用,本研究探讨了全尺寸 HRB650E 高强度钢筋混凝土桥墩的抗震性能。首先,对具有相同细长比的 HRB400 和 HRB650E 钢筋进行了单调拉伸试验,以分析其力学性能的差异。随后,在四个方形全尺寸 RC 桥墩上进行了准静力循环试验,以检验新型高强度钢筋、箍筋比和轴向荷载比对抗震性能的影响。根据实验结果,建立了适用于 HRB650E 钢筋混凝土柱的滞后模型。研究结果表明,与 HRB400 钢筋相比,HRB650E 钢筋的均匀伸长率和断裂伸长率较低。HRB650E 墩柱达到裂缝破坏时的位移比 HRB400 墩柱高 36%,并且在所有荷载水平下都表现出较低的残余位移。与 HRB400 桥墩相比,HRB650E 桥墩的最大横向承载能力和延性系数都有显著提高。虽然两种桥墩的初始正弦刚度相当,但 HRB650E 桥墩的刚度退化速度较慢,因此在极限状态下的正弦刚度较高。它们在极限状态下的累积能量耗散也高出 35%。当 HRB650E 墩柱的箍筋比从 1.1 % 增加到 1.7 % 时,残余位移略有减少,屈服强度略有增加,最大横向承载能力略有提高。此外,还观察到更高的箍筋比提高了所有加载阶段的能量耗散水平。将 HRB650E 桥墩的轴向荷载比从 0.1 提高到 0.2,可使桥墩在相同的可修复极限状态下承受更大的变形,屈服强度、最大横向承载力、初始正弦刚度和极限状态下的正弦刚度均显著提高,但累积能量耗散略有增加。基于实验数据的 HRB650E RC 柱滞后模型具有良好的计算精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study on seismic performance of bridge pier with new HRB650E high-strength steel bar
To facilitate the application of high-strength steel in reinforced concrete bridge structures, this study explores the seismic performance of full-scale HRB650E high-strength reinforced concrete bridge piers. Initially, monotonic tensile tests were conducted on HRB400 and HRB650E steel rebars with the same slenderness ratio to analyze the differences in their mechanical properties. Subsequently, quasi-static cyclic tests were carried out on four square full-scale RC bridge piers to examine the influence of new high-strength rebars, stirrup ratios, and axial load ratios on the seismic performance. Based on the experimental results, a hysteresis model suitable for HRB650E reinforced concrete columns was developed. The findings indicate that the HRB650E steel bar exhibited lower uniform elongation and fracture elongation compared to HRB400 steel bar. The displacement at which HRB650E piers reached crack damage was 36 % higher than that of HRB400 piers, and they also showed lower residual displacements at all load levels. The maximum lateral load capacity and the ductility coefficient of HRB650E piers increased significantly compared to HRB400 piers. While the initial secant stiffness of both types was comparable, HRB650E piers exhibited a slower rate of stiffness degradation, resulting in higher secant stiffness at the ultimate state. They also demonstrated 35 % higher cumulative energy dissipation at the ultimate state. When the stirrup ratio of HRB650E piers was increased from 1.1 % to 1.7 %, there was a slight reduction in residual displacement, a small increase of the yield strength, and a minor improvement in the maximum lateral load capacity. Furthermore, a higher stirrup ratio was observed to improve energy dissipation levels at all loading stages. Increasing the axial load ratio of HRB650E piers from 0.1 to 0.2 allowed the piers to withstand greater deformations at the same repairable ultimate state, with significant increases in yield strength, maximum lateral load capacity, initial secant stiffness, and secant stiffness at the ultimate state, but a small increase in the cumulative energy dissipation. The hysteresis model for HRB650E RC columns, based on experimental data, exhibited good computational accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信