通过患者报告结果(PROs)加强儿科肿瘤临床试验

David Riedl , Niclas Hubel , Annalena Endres , Chiara Vetrano , Andreas Meryk , Roman Crazzolara
{"title":"通过患者报告结果(PROs)加强儿科肿瘤临床试验","authors":"David Riedl ,&nbsp;Niclas Hubel ,&nbsp;Annalena Endres ,&nbsp;Chiara Vetrano ,&nbsp;Andreas Meryk ,&nbsp;Roman Crazzolara","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Survival rates of children with cancer have significantly increased over the last decades in high income countries. However, cancer survivors often face significant long-term adverse effects on physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive health. The use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials may help to further optimize treatment regimens to minimize acute and late adverse events. Despite clear recommendations of regulatory agencies, the use of PROs in pediatric clinical trials remains limited. In this article, we discuss the rationale to assess PROs in pediatric clinical trials with a specific highlight on electronic PRO (ePRO) assessment. In addition, we underscore the importance of recent international guideline developments such as the <em>Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data</em> (SISAQOL-IMI) and the <em>CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials – Patient-Reported Outcomes</em> (CONSORT-PRO) to improve the robustness of PRO data assessment in pediatric oncology, thus facilitating better patient care and more accurate assessments of treatment effects. Best practice examples for the use of modern technologies in ePRO assessments are presented and potential barriers and challenges are discussed. We conclude that – despite some challenges and barriers – the routine assessment of (e)PROs in pediatric clinical trials has the potential to substantially improve the quality of the trials and facilitate the usability of outcome data. We call for a joint effort to take proactive steps to incorporate PROs into clinical trials in pediatric oncology, thus giving children a voice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing pediatric oncology clinical trials through patient reported outcomes (PROs)\",\"authors\":\"David Riedl ,&nbsp;Niclas Hubel ,&nbsp;Annalena Endres ,&nbsp;Chiara Vetrano ,&nbsp;Andreas Meryk ,&nbsp;Roman Crazzolara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Survival rates of children with cancer have significantly increased over the last decades in high income countries. However, cancer survivors often face significant long-term adverse effects on physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive health. The use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials may help to further optimize treatment regimens to minimize acute and late adverse events. Despite clear recommendations of regulatory agencies, the use of PROs in pediatric clinical trials remains limited. In this article, we discuss the rationale to assess PROs in pediatric clinical trials with a specific highlight on electronic PRO (ePRO) assessment. In addition, we underscore the importance of recent international guideline developments such as the <em>Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data</em> (SISAQOL-IMI) and the <em>CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials – Patient-Reported Outcomes</em> (CONSORT-PRO) to improve the robustness of PRO data assessment in pediatric oncology, thus facilitating better patient care and more accurate assessments of treatment effects. Best practice examples for the use of modern technologies in ePRO assessments are presented and potential barriers and challenges are discussed. We conclude that – despite some challenges and barriers – the routine assessment of (e)PROs in pediatric clinical trials has the potential to substantially improve the quality of the trials and facilitate the usability of outcome data. We call for a joint effort to take proactive steps to incorporate PROs into clinical trials in pediatric oncology, thus giving children a voice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X2400059X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X2400059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几十年来,高收入国家儿童癌症患者的存活率显著提高。然而,癌症幸存者往往在身体、社会心理和神经认知健康方面面临严重的长期不良影响。在临床试验中使用 "患者报告结果"(PROs)有助于进一步优化治疗方案,最大限度地减少急性和晚期不良反应。尽管监管机构提出了明确的建议,但在儿科临床试验中使用患者报告结果仍然有限。在本文中,我们讨论了在儿科临床试验中评估PRO的理由,并特别强调了电子PRO(ePRO)评估。此外,我们还强调了近期国际指南发展的重要性,如《分析患者报告结果和生活质量终点数据的国际标准设定》(SISAQOL-IMI)和《试验报告综合标准--患者报告结果》(CONSORT-PRO),以提高儿科肿瘤学中PRO数据评估的稳健性,从而促进更好的患者护理和更准确的治疗效果评估。我们介绍了在 ePRO 评估中使用现代技术的最佳实践范例,并讨论了潜在的障碍和挑战。我们的结论是,尽管存在一些挑战和障碍,但在儿科临床试验中常规评估(e)PROs 有可能大大提高试验质量,促进结果数据的可用性。我们呼吁大家共同努力,采取积极措施,将 PROs 纳入儿科肿瘤临床试验,从而让儿童有发言权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing pediatric oncology clinical trials through patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Survival rates of children with cancer have significantly increased over the last decades in high income countries. However, cancer survivors often face significant long-term adverse effects on physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive health. The use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials may help to further optimize treatment regimens to minimize acute and late adverse events. Despite clear recommendations of regulatory agencies, the use of PROs in pediatric clinical trials remains limited. In this article, we discuss the rationale to assess PROs in pediatric clinical trials with a specific highlight on electronic PRO (ePRO) assessment. In addition, we underscore the importance of recent international guideline developments such as the Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL-IMI) and the CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials – Patient-Reported Outcomes (CONSORT-PRO) to improve the robustness of PRO data assessment in pediatric oncology, thus facilitating better patient care and more accurate assessments of treatment effects. Best practice examples for the use of modern technologies in ePRO assessments are presented and potential barriers and challenges are discussed. We conclude that – despite some challenges and barriers – the routine assessment of (e)PROs in pediatric clinical trials has the potential to substantially improve the quality of the trials and facilitate the usability of outcome data. We call for a joint effort to take proactive steps to incorporate PROs into clinical trials in pediatric oncology, thus giving children a voice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信