Abanoub J. Armanious , Audrey Asare , Deborah Mitchison , Morgan H. James
{"title":"患者对利血平治疗暴食症的看法:探索性定性和定量分析","authors":"Abanoub J. Armanious , Audrey Asare , Deborah Mitchison , Morgan H. James","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is the only medication to have gained FDA approval for the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED). LDX treatment is generally effective at reducing binge eating symptoms but is associated with several unwanted side effects. How BED patients perceive the therapeutic efficacy vs. associated side effects of LDX has not been explored. We carried out a thematic analysis of 111 online reviews posted to the website Drugs.com by persons prescribed LDX to treat BED. We also explored how qualitative themes were associated with perceptions of treatment efficacy on a quantitative (1–10 scale) scale. Themes associated with higher efficacy ratings included improved binge eating outcomes, enhanced focus/concentration, as well as weight loss (χ<sup>2</sup> tests, p's < 0.05). Lower efficacy ratings were associated with themes that included tolerance to therapeutic effects of LDX, insomnia, return of binge eating in the evening, loss of energy in the afternoon/evening (‘crashing’), and weight gain (χ<sup>2</sup> tests, p's < 0.05). Limitations of the study include representativeness of the data and self-reported BED diagnosis. Together, these data provide novel insights into individual experiences with LDX as a treatment for BED and their association with perceived efficacy. The causal nature of these relationships should be tested in future studies, as well as any implications for medication adherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient perceptions of lisdexamfetamine as a treatment for binge eating disorder: An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Abanoub J. Armanious , Audrey Asare , Deborah Mitchison , Morgan H. James\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is the only medication to have gained FDA approval for the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED). LDX treatment is generally effective at reducing binge eating symptoms but is associated with several unwanted side effects. How BED patients perceive the therapeutic efficacy vs. associated side effects of LDX has not been explored. We carried out a thematic analysis of 111 online reviews posted to the website Drugs.com by persons prescribed LDX to treat BED. We also explored how qualitative themes were associated with perceptions of treatment efficacy on a quantitative (1–10 scale) scale. Themes associated with higher efficacy ratings included improved binge eating outcomes, enhanced focus/concentration, as well as weight loss (χ<sup>2</sup> tests, p's < 0.05). Lower efficacy ratings were associated with themes that included tolerance to therapeutic effects of LDX, insomnia, return of binge eating in the evening, loss of energy in the afternoon/evening (‘crashing’), and weight gain (χ<sup>2</sup> tests, p's < 0.05). Limitations of the study include representativeness of the data and self-reported BED diagnosis. Together, these data provide novel insights into individual experiences with LDX as a treatment for BED and their association with perceived efficacy. The causal nature of these relationships should be tested in future studies, as well as any implications for medication adherence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598724000412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) 是唯一一种获得 FDA 批准用于治疗暴食症 (BED) 的药物。LDX 治疗通常能有效减轻暴食症状,但会产生一些不良副作用。关于暴食症患者如何看待 LDX 的疗效与相关副作用,目前尚未有研究。我们对处方 LDX 治疗 BED 的患者在 Drugs.com 网站上发布的 111 篇在线评论进行了主题分析。我们还探讨了定性主题与定量(1-10 级)疗效认知之间的关联。与较高疗效评分相关的主题包括暴饮暴食结果的改善、专注力/集中力的提高以及体重的减轻(χ2 检验,P's < 0.05)。疗效评分较低的主题包括对 LDX 治疗效果的耐受性、失眠、晚上恢复暴饮暴食、下午/晚上精力下降("崩溃")以及体重增加(χ2 检验,P's < 0.05)。研究的局限性包括数据的代表性和自我报告的 BED 诊断。总之,这些数据为我们提供了新的视角,让我们了解个人使用 LDX 治疗 BED 的经历及其与感知疗效之间的关系。这些关系的因果性质以及对用药依从性的影响应在今后的研究中进行检验。
Patient perceptions of lisdexamfetamine as a treatment for binge eating disorder: An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis
Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is the only medication to have gained FDA approval for the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED). LDX treatment is generally effective at reducing binge eating symptoms but is associated with several unwanted side effects. How BED patients perceive the therapeutic efficacy vs. associated side effects of LDX has not been explored. We carried out a thematic analysis of 111 online reviews posted to the website Drugs.com by persons prescribed LDX to treat BED. We also explored how qualitative themes were associated with perceptions of treatment efficacy on a quantitative (1–10 scale) scale. Themes associated with higher efficacy ratings included improved binge eating outcomes, enhanced focus/concentration, as well as weight loss (χ2 tests, p's < 0.05). Lower efficacy ratings were associated with themes that included tolerance to therapeutic effects of LDX, insomnia, return of binge eating in the evening, loss of energy in the afternoon/evening (‘crashing’), and weight gain (χ2 tests, p's < 0.05). Limitations of the study include representativeness of the data and self-reported BED diagnosis. Together, these data provide novel insights into individual experiences with LDX as a treatment for BED and their association with perceived efficacy. The causal nature of these relationships should be tested in future studies, as well as any implications for medication adherence.