外科病理学中的可委托专业活动(EPAs):住院医师发展的实施经验和纵向观察

IF 1.2 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Alcino Gama MD , Christopher Felicelli MD , Indu Agarwal MD , Taylor Bronson MD , Bonnie Choy MD , David J. Escobar MD, PhD , Jennifer Y. Ju MD , Carissa LaBoy MD , Ritu Nayar MD , Behtash G. Nezami MD , Jessica Nguyen MD , Farres Obeidin MD , Jenna Purdy MD , Elisheva Shanes MD , Amanda L. Strickland MD , Luis Z. Blanco Jr. MD , Jorge E. Novo MD
{"title":"外科病理学中的可委托专业活动(EPAs):住院医师发展的实施经验和纵向观察","authors":"Alcino Gama MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Felicelli MD ,&nbsp;Indu Agarwal MD ,&nbsp;Taylor Bronson MD ,&nbsp;Bonnie Choy MD ,&nbsp;David J. Escobar MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Y. Ju MD ,&nbsp;Carissa LaBoy MD ,&nbsp;Ritu Nayar MD ,&nbsp;Behtash G. Nezami MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Farres Obeidin MD ,&nbsp;Jenna Purdy MD ,&nbsp;Elisheva Shanes MD ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Strickland MD ,&nbsp;Luis Z. Blanco Jr. MD ,&nbsp;Jorge E. Novo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been implemented in various medical specialties, and the Pathology National EPA Working Group has piloted the implementation of four pathology EPAs. We recently published the development of EPAs within our surgical pathology rotation. Following a six-month pilot, a survey demonstrated that faculty and residents found the forms helpful and easy to use and easy to understand, and EPAs have been fully incorporated into our surgical pathology rotation. Here, we discuss our experience, challenges, and results of resident EPA performance for intraoperative consultations (IOC) and sign-out (SO) after 21 months of implementation. Between June 2022 and March 2024, 24 residents were evaluated by 13 faculty members, resulting in 136 IOC and 298 SO EPA forms. Paper forms were predominantly used, with only five electronic forms submitted. EPA performance scores for SO increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 in Block 1 to 4.6 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p &lt; 0.0001), whereas performance scores for IOC increased from 2.7 ± 1.0 in Block 1 to 4.8 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p &lt; 0.0001). The progressive decrease in the standard deviation throughout residency denotes higher competence homogeneity as residency graduation approaches. Overall, our EPA evaluation method showed ease of use, provided valuable tracking tools, and long-term feasibility. EPAs are robust tools for tracking resident progression toward independent practice in surgical pathology, offering valuable insights for program and rotation directors to assess and track individual EPA skills, identify intervention points, and provide an opportunity for immediate, actionable feedback based on current performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in surgical pathology: implementation experience and longitudinal observations of resident development\",\"authors\":\"Alcino Gama MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Felicelli MD ,&nbsp;Indu Agarwal MD ,&nbsp;Taylor Bronson MD ,&nbsp;Bonnie Choy MD ,&nbsp;David J. Escobar MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Y. Ju MD ,&nbsp;Carissa LaBoy MD ,&nbsp;Ritu Nayar MD ,&nbsp;Behtash G. Nezami MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Farres Obeidin MD ,&nbsp;Jenna Purdy MD ,&nbsp;Elisheva Shanes MD ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Strickland MD ,&nbsp;Luis Z. Blanco Jr. MD ,&nbsp;Jorge E. Novo MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been implemented in various medical specialties, and the Pathology National EPA Working Group has piloted the implementation of four pathology EPAs. We recently published the development of EPAs within our surgical pathology rotation. Following a six-month pilot, a survey demonstrated that faculty and residents found the forms helpful and easy to use and easy to understand, and EPAs have been fully incorporated into our surgical pathology rotation. Here, we discuss our experience, challenges, and results of resident EPA performance for intraoperative consultations (IOC) and sign-out (SO) after 21 months of implementation. Between June 2022 and March 2024, 24 residents were evaluated by 13 faculty members, resulting in 136 IOC and 298 SO EPA forms. Paper forms were predominantly used, with only five electronic forms submitted. EPA performance scores for SO increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 in Block 1 to 4.6 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p &lt; 0.0001), whereas performance scores for IOC increased from 2.7 ± 1.0 in Block 1 to 4.8 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p &lt; 0.0001). The progressive decrease in the standard deviation throughout residency denotes higher competence homogeneity as residency graduation approaches. Overall, our EPA evaluation method showed ease of use, provided valuable tracking tools, and long-term feasibility. EPAs are robust tools for tracking resident progression toward independent practice in surgical pathology, offering valuable insights for program and rotation directors to assess and track individual EPA skills, identify intervention points, and provide an opportunity for immediate, actionable feedback based on current performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289524000460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289524000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受托专业活动(EPAs)已在各医学专科实施,病理学国家 EPA 工作组已试行了四项病理学 EPAs。我们最近公布了外科病理学轮转中 EPA 的发展情况。经过 6 个月的试点,一项调查显示,教师和住院医师都认为这些表格很有帮助、易于使用且易于理解,因此 EPA 已完全纳入我们的外科病理学轮转中。在此,我们将讨论我们的经验、挑战以及实施 21 个月后住院医师术中会诊(IOC)和签出(SO)的 EPA 表现结果。在 2022 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,13 名教师对 24 名住院医师进行了评估,共收到 136 份 IOC 和 298 份 SO EPA 表格。主要使用纸质表格,仅提交了 5 份电子表格。SO的EPA表现得分从第1组的2.4±0.8分增加到第14组的4.6±0.2分(p <0.0001),而IOC的表现得分从第1组的2.7±1.0分增加到第14组的4.8±0.2分(p <0.0001)。在整个住院医师培训期间,标准偏差逐渐减小,这表明随着住院医师培训毕业的临近,能力的同质性更高。总之,我们的 EPA 评估方法易于使用,提供了有价值的跟踪工具和长期可行性。EPA 是跟踪住院医师在外科病理学独立实践方面进展的有力工具,为项目和轮转主任评估和跟踪个人 EPA 技能、确定干预点提供了有价值的见解,并为基于当前表现的即时、可操作反馈提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in surgical pathology: implementation experience and longitudinal observations of resident development
Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been implemented in various medical specialties, and the Pathology National EPA Working Group has piloted the implementation of four pathology EPAs. We recently published the development of EPAs within our surgical pathology rotation. Following a six-month pilot, a survey demonstrated that faculty and residents found the forms helpful and easy to use and easy to understand, and EPAs have been fully incorporated into our surgical pathology rotation. Here, we discuss our experience, challenges, and results of resident EPA performance for intraoperative consultations (IOC) and sign-out (SO) after 21 months of implementation. Between June 2022 and March 2024, 24 residents were evaluated by 13 faculty members, resulting in 136 IOC and 298 SO EPA forms. Paper forms were predominantly used, with only five electronic forms submitted. EPA performance scores for SO increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 in Block 1 to 4.6 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p < 0.0001), whereas performance scores for IOC increased from 2.7 ± 1.0 in Block 1 to 4.8 ± 0.2 in Block 14 (p < 0.0001). The progressive decrease in the standard deviation throughout residency denotes higher competence homogeneity as residency graduation approaches. Overall, our EPA evaluation method showed ease of use, provided valuable tracking tools, and long-term feasibility. EPAs are robust tools for tracking resident progression toward independent practice in surgical pathology, offering valuable insights for program and rotation directors to assess and track individual EPA skills, identify intervention points, and provide an opportunity for immediate, actionable feedback based on current performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pathology
Academic Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信