驾驭不确定性:探索消费者在自我威胁和高风险决策下对人工智能的接受程度

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Darius-Aurel Frank , Polymeros Chrysochou , Panagiotis Mitkidis , Tobias Otterbring , Dan Ariely
{"title":"驾驭不确定性:探索消费者在自我威胁和高风险决策下对人工智能的接受程度","authors":"Darius-Aurel Frank ,&nbsp;Polymeros Chrysochou ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Mitkidis ,&nbsp;Tobias Otterbring ,&nbsp;Dan Ariely","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In an era of transformation fueled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), human resistance to adopt this powerful technology has emerged as one of its most critical barriers. In a series of four studies involving almost 4,000 consumers, this research explores factors that contribute to consumer reluctance toward AI through theories related to algorithm aversion, decision-making under risk, and compensatory decision-making. The results underscore the impact of decision stakes and their adverse outcomes on AI service agent adoption across decision domains. These effects can be attributed to the self-threat experienced by consumers in high-stakes decision scenarios. Together, the current findings advance our understanding of consumer responses in the context of AI adoption, illustrating how perceived stakes and self-threats foster reluctance to rely on AI agents for advice. From a practical standpoint, the results emphasize the need of a hybrid approach—combining AI and human agents—for a successful transition toward AI-powered service industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102732"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating uncertainty: Exploring consumer acceptance of artificial intelligence under self-threats and high-stakes decisions\",\"authors\":\"Darius-Aurel Frank ,&nbsp;Polymeros Chrysochou ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Mitkidis ,&nbsp;Tobias Otterbring ,&nbsp;Dan Ariely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In an era of transformation fueled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), human resistance to adopt this powerful technology has emerged as one of its most critical barriers. In a series of four studies involving almost 4,000 consumers, this research explores factors that contribute to consumer reluctance toward AI through theories related to algorithm aversion, decision-making under risk, and compensatory decision-making. The results underscore the impact of decision stakes and their adverse outcomes on AI service agent adoption across decision domains. These effects can be attributed to the self-threat experienced by consumers in high-stakes decision scenarios. Together, the current findings advance our understanding of consumer responses in the context of AI adoption, illustrating how perceived stakes and self-threats foster reluctance to rely on AI agents for advice. From a practical standpoint, the results emphasize the need of a hybrid approach—combining AI and human agents—for a successful transition toward AI-powered service industries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2400280X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2400280X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人工智能(AI)推动变革的时代,人类对采用这一强大技术的抵触情绪已成为其最关键的障碍之一。在涉及近 4000 名消费者的四项系列研究中,本研究通过与算法厌恶、风险决策和补偿决策相关的理论,探讨了导致消费者不愿采用人工智能的因素。研究结果强调了决策风险及其不利结果对各决策领域采用人工智能服务代理的影响。这些影响可归因于消费者在高风险决策场景中所经历的自我威胁。总之,当前的研究结果推进了我们对消费者在采用人工智能时的反应的理解,说明了感知到的利害关系和自我威胁是如何导致消费者不愿依赖人工智能代理提供建议的。从实用的角度来看,研究结果强调了采用人工智能与人类代理相结合的混合方法的必要性,以便成功过渡到人工智能驱动的服务行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating uncertainty: Exploring consumer acceptance of artificial intelligence under self-threats and high-stakes decisions
In an era of transformation fueled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), human resistance to adopt this powerful technology has emerged as one of its most critical barriers. In a series of four studies involving almost 4,000 consumers, this research explores factors that contribute to consumer reluctance toward AI through theories related to algorithm aversion, decision-making under risk, and compensatory decision-making. The results underscore the impact of decision stakes and their adverse outcomes on AI service agent adoption across decision domains. These effects can be attributed to the self-threat experienced by consumers in high-stakes decision scenarios. Together, the current findings advance our understanding of consumer responses in the context of AI adoption, illustrating how perceived stakes and self-threats foster reluctance to rely on AI agents for advice. From a practical standpoint, the results emphasize the need of a hybrid approach—combining AI and human agents—for a successful transition toward AI-powered service industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信