Kevin A. Wood , Lucy L. Jupe , Francisca C. Aguiar , Alexandra M. Collins , Scott J. Davidson , Will Freeman , Liam Kirkpatrick , Tatiana Lobato-de Magalhães , Emma McKinley , Ana Nuno , Jordi F. Pagès , Antonella Petruzzella , Dave Pritchard , Jonathan P. Reeves , Sidinei Magela Thomaz , Sara A. Thornton , Hiromi Yamashita , Julia L. Newth
{"title":"对湿地提供的文化生态系统服务进行全球系统审查","authors":"Kevin A. Wood , Lucy L. Jupe , Francisca C. Aguiar , Alexandra M. Collins , Scott J. Davidson , Will Freeman , Liam Kirkpatrick , Tatiana Lobato-de Magalhães , Emma McKinley , Ana Nuno , Jordi F. Pagès , Antonella Petruzzella , Dave Pritchard , Jonathan P. Reeves , Sidinei Magela Thomaz , Sara A. Thornton , Hiromi Yamashita , Julia L. Newth","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands make a disproportionately large contribution to global biodiversity and provide critical ecosystem services for humanity. Yet, our understanding of the cultural ecosystem services (CES) provided by wetlands remains limited, with benefits often only recognised at local scales. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of wetland CES. Our synthesis addressed key questions related to the provision of CES by different types of wetlands, their economic value, their co-occurrence and associations with other ecosystem services, threats to the provision of CES by wetlands, as well as the availability and use of CES information. Based on 861 published papers (1968–2022) in 17 languages, we found evidence of CES provided by wetlands in 175 countries and territories, highlighting that wetlands are globally important for the provision of CES. Recreation/tourism was the most frequently reported CES (40 %), with cultural identity/heritage (16 %) and education/learning/knowledge (13 %) also well-represented. In contrast, examples of sense of place (4 %) and bequest (4 %) were least frequent. Our synthesis of published estimates yielded a mean of £57262 ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for the cultural benefits of wetlands; however, this mean should be interpreted with caution given that we documented a very wide range of estimates for each CES type of <£1–£1065205 ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Threats to wetland CES were documented in 45 % of papers, and included wetland destruction, pollution, and climate change. The probability that a CES paper would be available open access, and the probability that a published paper featured at least one author affiliated with the country where the study was conducted, both varied significantly among continents and publication years. Conservation outcomes related to CES featured in 13 % of papers, whilst 10 % made policy/management recommendations. Our study highlights the links between wetlands and human culture, emphasising their importance in motivating future wetland creation and restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands\",\"authors\":\"Kevin A. Wood , Lucy L. Jupe , Francisca C. Aguiar , Alexandra M. Collins , Scott J. Davidson , Will Freeman , Liam Kirkpatrick , Tatiana Lobato-de Magalhães , Emma McKinley , Ana Nuno , Jordi F. Pagès , Antonella Petruzzella , Dave Pritchard , Jonathan P. Reeves , Sidinei Magela Thomaz , Sara A. Thornton , Hiromi Yamashita , Julia L. Newth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wetlands make a disproportionately large contribution to global biodiversity and provide critical ecosystem services for humanity. Yet, our understanding of the cultural ecosystem services (CES) provided by wetlands remains limited, with benefits often only recognised at local scales. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of wetland CES. Our synthesis addressed key questions related to the provision of CES by different types of wetlands, their economic value, their co-occurrence and associations with other ecosystem services, threats to the provision of CES by wetlands, as well as the availability and use of CES information. Based on 861 published papers (1968–2022) in 17 languages, we found evidence of CES provided by wetlands in 175 countries and territories, highlighting that wetlands are globally important for the provision of CES. Recreation/tourism was the most frequently reported CES (40 %), with cultural identity/heritage (16 %) and education/learning/knowledge (13 %) also well-represented. In contrast, examples of sense of place (4 %) and bequest (4 %) were least frequent. Our synthesis of published estimates yielded a mean of £57262 ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for the cultural benefits of wetlands; however, this mean should be interpreted with caution given that we documented a very wide range of estimates for each CES type of <£1–£1065205 ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Threats to wetland CES were documented in 45 % of papers, and included wetland destruction, pollution, and climate change. The probability that a CES paper would be available open access, and the probability that a published paper featured at least one author affiliated with the country where the study was conducted, both varied significantly among continents and publication years. Conservation outcomes related to CES featured in 13 % of papers, whilst 10 % made policy/management recommendations. Our study highlights the links between wetlands and human culture, emphasising their importance in motivating future wetland creation and restoration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000809\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
湿地为全球生物多样性做出了巨大贡献,并为人类提供了重要的生态系统服务。然而,我们对湿地提供的文化生态系统服务 (CES) 的了解仍然有限,其效益往往只在局部范围内得到认可。为了填补这一知识空白,我们对湿地文化生态系统服务进行了一次全球性系统综述。我们的综述探讨了与不同类型湿地提供的 CES、其经济价值、与其他生态系统服务的共存性和关联性、湿地提供 CES 所面临的威胁以及 CES 信息的可用性和使用有关的关键问题。根据用 17 种语言发表的 861 篇论文(1968-2022 年),我们在 175 个国家和地区发现了湿地提供 CES 的证据,凸显了湿地在提供 CES 方面的全球重要性。休闲/旅游是最常报道的CES(40%),文化认同/遗产(16%)和教育/学习/知识(13%)也占很大比例。相比之下,地方感(4%)和遗赠(4%)最不常见。我们对已公布的估算值进行了综合,得出湿地文化效益的平均值为 57262 英镑/公顷-1 年-1;但是,鉴于我们记录的每种 CES 类型的估算值范围非常广泛,从 1 英镑-1065205 英镑/公顷-1 年-1,因此在解释这一平均值时应谨慎。45% 的论文记录了湿地 CES 面临的威胁,其中包括湿地破坏、污染和气候变化。不同大洲和不同发表年份的 CES 论文公开发表的概率以及发表的论文中至少有一名作者隶属于研究所在国的概率都存在显著差异。13%的论文介绍了与CES相关的保护成果,10%的论文提出了政策/管理建议。我们的研究突出了湿地与人类文化之间的联系,强调了它们在激励未来湿地创建和恢复方面的重要性。
A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands
Wetlands make a disproportionately large contribution to global biodiversity and provide critical ecosystem services for humanity. Yet, our understanding of the cultural ecosystem services (CES) provided by wetlands remains limited, with benefits often only recognised at local scales. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of wetland CES. Our synthesis addressed key questions related to the provision of CES by different types of wetlands, their economic value, their co-occurrence and associations with other ecosystem services, threats to the provision of CES by wetlands, as well as the availability and use of CES information. Based on 861 published papers (1968–2022) in 17 languages, we found evidence of CES provided by wetlands in 175 countries and territories, highlighting that wetlands are globally important for the provision of CES. Recreation/tourism was the most frequently reported CES (40 %), with cultural identity/heritage (16 %) and education/learning/knowledge (13 %) also well-represented. In contrast, examples of sense of place (4 %) and bequest (4 %) were least frequent. Our synthesis of published estimates yielded a mean of £57262 ha−1 yr−1 for the cultural benefits of wetlands; however, this mean should be interpreted with caution given that we documented a very wide range of estimates for each CES type of <£1–£1065205 ha−1 yr−1. Threats to wetland CES were documented in 45 % of papers, and included wetland destruction, pollution, and climate change. The probability that a CES paper would be available open access, and the probability that a published paper featured at least one author affiliated with the country where the study was conducted, both varied significantly among continents and publication years. Conservation outcomes related to CES featured in 13 % of papers, whilst 10 % made policy/management recommendations. Our study highlights the links between wetlands and human culture, emphasising their importance in motivating future wetland creation and restoration.
期刊介绍:
Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly.
Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.