Anže Pungerčič , Vicente Bécares , Daniel Cano-Ott , Roberta Cirillo , Tom Clarijs , Jacek Gajewski , Bor Kos , Renata Mikołajczak , Evžen Novák , Gabriel Pavel , Georg Pohlner , Lisanne Van Puyvelde , Jörg Starflinger , László Szentmiklósi , Joanna Walkiewicz , Luka Snoj
{"title":"在优化使用研究堆(TOURR)项目范围内制定的欧洲研究堆战略","authors":"Anže Pungerčič , Vicente Bécares , Daniel Cano-Ott , Roberta Cirillo , Tom Clarijs , Jacek Gajewski , Bor Kos , Renata Mikołajczak , Evžen Novák , Gabriel Pavel , Georg Pohlner , Lisanne Van Puyvelde , Jörg Starflinger , László Szentmiklósi , Joanna Walkiewicz , Luka Snoj","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear research reactors ( RR ) are essential facilities in countries implementing nuclear power plants and are used for experiments necessary for commercial reactor development, training and education programs, and many other applications not related to nuclear energy production (e.g., isotope production, neutron sources, materials science). Europe has a broad and very diverse landscape of RRs, many of which have been in operation for 30-60 years, are well maintained and regularly modernized. However, financial pressures caused by a combination of declining interest and the lack of a sound financial model have led to the closure of many of them (e.g. OSIRIS in Saclay, JEEP II research reactor at IFE Kjeller and BER2 in Berlin). These negative trends called for coordinated European action to assess the impact of the declining number of RRs. The Towards Optimized Use of Research Reactors (TOURR) project was a response to this challenge. Its main objective was to assess the status of the EU RR fleet and to develop a strategy for the refurbishment and construction of new RR in Europe. The assessment was based on analysed data obtained through extensive questionnaires sent to all operating European RR. The analysis revealed gaps in terms of lack of long-term funding, lack of manpower and lack of communication between RRs and their customers. It also showed threats of further European RR closures. Regarding the long-term EU RR strategy, the main recommendations of the TOURR project are to build (at least) two RRs, a medium-flux multipurpose reactor and a flexible zero-power facility. Both reactor cores could be part of a single facility built at the European level and accessible to all EU Member States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European research reactor strategy derived in the scope of the towards optimized use of research reactors (TOURR) project\",\"authors\":\"Anže Pungerčič , Vicente Bécares , Daniel Cano-Ott , Roberta Cirillo , Tom Clarijs , Jacek Gajewski , Bor Kos , Renata Mikołajczak , Evžen Novák , Gabriel Pavel , Georg Pohlner , Lisanne Van Puyvelde , Jörg Starflinger , László Szentmiklósi , Joanna Walkiewicz , Luka Snoj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear research reactors ( RR ) are essential facilities in countries implementing nuclear power plants and are used for experiments necessary for commercial reactor development, training and education programs, and many other applications not related to nuclear energy production (e.g., isotope production, neutron sources, materials science). Europe has a broad and very diverse landscape of RRs, many of which have been in operation for 30-60 years, are well maintained and regularly modernized. However, financial pressures caused by a combination of declining interest and the lack of a sound financial model have led to the closure of many of them (e.g. OSIRIS in Saclay, JEEP II research reactor at IFE Kjeller and BER2 in Berlin). These negative trends called for coordinated European action to assess the impact of the declining number of RRs. The Towards Optimized Use of Research Reactors (TOURR) project was a response to this challenge. Its main objective was to assess the status of the EU RR fleet and to develop a strategy for the refurbishment and construction of new RR in Europe. The assessment was based on analysed data obtained through extensive questionnaires sent to all operating European RR. The analysis revealed gaps in terms of lack of long-term funding, lack of manpower and lack of communication between RRs and their customers. It also showed threats of further European RR closures. Regarding the long-term EU RR strategy, the main recommendations of the TOURR project are to build (at least) two RRs, a medium-flux multipurpose reactor and a flexible zero-power facility. Both reactor cores could be part of a single facility built at the European level and accessible to all EU Member States.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924006261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924006261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
European research reactor strategy derived in the scope of the towards optimized use of research reactors (TOURR) project
Nuclear research reactors ( RR ) are essential facilities in countries implementing nuclear power plants and are used for experiments necessary for commercial reactor development, training and education programs, and many other applications not related to nuclear energy production (e.g., isotope production, neutron sources, materials science). Europe has a broad and very diverse landscape of RRs, many of which have been in operation for 30-60 years, are well maintained and regularly modernized. However, financial pressures caused by a combination of declining interest and the lack of a sound financial model have led to the closure of many of them (e.g. OSIRIS in Saclay, JEEP II research reactor at IFE Kjeller and BER2 in Berlin). These negative trends called for coordinated European action to assess the impact of the declining number of RRs. The Towards Optimized Use of Research Reactors (TOURR) project was a response to this challenge. Its main objective was to assess the status of the EU RR fleet and to develop a strategy for the refurbishment and construction of new RR in Europe. The assessment was based on analysed data obtained through extensive questionnaires sent to all operating European RR. The analysis revealed gaps in terms of lack of long-term funding, lack of manpower and lack of communication between RRs and their customers. It also showed threats of further European RR closures. Regarding the long-term EU RR strategy, the main recommendations of the TOURR project are to build (at least) two RRs, a medium-flux multipurpose reactor and a flexible zero-power facility. Both reactor cores could be part of a single facility built at the European level and accessible to all EU Member States.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.