Daniel Sebastián Rodríguez-León, Aleksandar Uzunov, Cecilia Costa, Dylan Elen, Leonidas Charistos, Thomas Galea, Martin Gabel, Ricarda Scheiner, M Alice Pinto, Thomas Schmitt
{"title":"解读欧洲六个蜜蜂亚种的角质层碳氢化合物特征的变化。","authors":"Daniel Sebastián Rodríguez-León, Aleksandar Uzunov, Cecilia Costa, Dylan Elen, Leonidas Charistos, Thomas Galea, Martin Gabel, Ricarda Scheiner, M Alice Pinto, Thomas Schmitt","doi":"10.1186/s12862-024-02325-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) subspecies exhibit local adaptive traits that evolved in response to the different environments that characterize their native distribution ranges. An important trait is the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile, which helps to prevent desiccation and mediate communication. We compared the CHC profiles of six European subspecies (A. m. mellifera, A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, A. m. macedonica, A. m. iberiensis, and A. m. ruttneri) and investigated potential factors shaping their composition. We did not find evidence of adaptation of the CHC profiles of the subspecies to the climatic conditions in their distribution range. Subspecies-specific differences in CHC composition might be explained by phylogenetic constraints or genetic drift. The CHC profiles of foragers were more subspecies-specific than those of nurse bees, while the latter showed more variation in their CHC profiles, likely due to the lower desiccation stress exerted by the controlled environment inside the hive. The strongest profile differences appeared between nurse bees and foragers among all subspecies, suggesting an adaptation to social task and a role in communication. Foragers also showed an increase in the relative amount of alkanes in their profiles compared to nurses, indicating adaptation to climatic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"24 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering the variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of six European honey bee subspecies.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sebastián Rodríguez-León, Aleksandar Uzunov, Cecilia Costa, Dylan Elen, Leonidas Charistos, Thomas Galea, Martin Gabel, Ricarda Scheiner, M Alice Pinto, Thomas Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12862-024-02325-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) subspecies exhibit local adaptive traits that evolved in response to the different environments that characterize their native distribution ranges. An important trait is the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile, which helps to prevent desiccation and mediate communication. We compared the CHC profiles of six European subspecies (A. m. mellifera, A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, A. m. macedonica, A. m. iberiensis, and A. m. ruttneri) and investigated potential factors shaping their composition. We did not find evidence of adaptation of the CHC profiles of the subspecies to the climatic conditions in their distribution range. Subspecies-specific differences in CHC composition might be explained by phylogenetic constraints or genetic drift. The CHC profiles of foragers were more subspecies-specific than those of nurse bees, while the latter showed more variation in their CHC profiles, likely due to the lower desiccation stress exerted by the controlled environment inside the hive. The strongest profile differences appeared between nurse bees and foragers among all subspecies, suggesting an adaptation to social task and a role in communication. Foragers also showed an increase in the relative amount of alkanes in their profiles compared to nurses, indicating adaptation to climatic conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC ecology and evolution\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC ecology and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02325-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02325-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)亚种表现出地方适应性特征,这些特征是针对其原生分布区的不同环境进化而来的。其中一个重要特征是有助于防止干燥和沟通的角质烃(CHC)特征。我们比较了六个欧洲亚种(A. mellifera、A. m. carnica、A. m. ligustica、A. m. macedonica、A. m. iberiensis 和 A. m. ruttneri)的 CHC 特征,并研究了影响其组成的潜在因素。我们没有发现亚种的 CHC 图谱适应其分布区气候条件的证据。亚种在CHC组成上的差异可能是由系统发育限制或遗传漂移造成的。与哺育蜂相比,觅食蜂的 CHC 图谱更具亚种特异性,而哺育蜂的 CHC 图谱则表现出更大的差异,这可能是由于蜂巢内受控环境产生的干燥压力较低。在所有亚种中,哺育蜂与觅食蜂之间的CHC差异最大,这表明哺育蜂适应了社会任务并在交流中发挥作用。与护理蜂相比,觅食蜂的烷烃含量也有所增加,这表明觅食蜂适应了气候条件。
Deciphering the variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of six European honey bee subspecies.
The Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) subspecies exhibit local adaptive traits that evolved in response to the different environments that characterize their native distribution ranges. An important trait is the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile, which helps to prevent desiccation and mediate communication. We compared the CHC profiles of six European subspecies (A. m. mellifera, A. m. carnica, A. m. ligustica, A. m. macedonica, A. m. iberiensis, and A. m. ruttneri) and investigated potential factors shaping their composition. We did not find evidence of adaptation of the CHC profiles of the subspecies to the climatic conditions in their distribution range. Subspecies-specific differences in CHC composition might be explained by phylogenetic constraints or genetic drift. The CHC profiles of foragers were more subspecies-specific than those of nurse bees, while the latter showed more variation in their CHC profiles, likely due to the lower desiccation stress exerted by the controlled environment inside the hive. The strongest profile differences appeared between nurse bees and foragers among all subspecies, suggesting an adaptation to social task and a role in communication. Foragers also showed an increase in the relative amount of alkanes in their profiles compared to nurses, indicating adaptation to climatic conditions.