比较渐进式平衡康复训练和髋关节强化康复训练对慢性踝关节失稳患者的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Ashley M B Suttmiller, Kelly R Johnson, Sunghoon Chung, Vanessa M Gruskiewicz, Niara N Foreman, Matthew C Reyes, Ryan S McCann
{"title":"比较渐进式平衡康复训练和髋关节强化康复训练对慢性踝关节失稳患者的影响。","authors":"Ashley M B Suttmiller, Kelly R Johnson, Sunghoon Chung, Vanessa M Gruskiewicz, Niara N Foreman, Matthew C Reyes, Ryan S McCann","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments, including reduced balance performance, hip strength, and ankle function, and increased disablement, and injury-related fear. Progressive balance training (BAL) and hip strengthening (HIP) can both improve balance and function, but their comparative effects are unknown. Our objective was to compare the effects of progressive BAL and HIP on balance, hip strength, and patient-reported outcomes in those with CAI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five individuals with CAI volunteered for this randomized control study. Participants were randomly allocated to BAL, HIP, and control (CON) groups (n = 15 per group). BAL and HIP each participated in 8-week interventions while CON did not. Participants' involved limbs underwent testing of patient-reported outcomes (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM-ADL, FAAM-S], modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale [mDPA], Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 [TSK-11], Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ], and Self-Efficacy of Balance Scale [SEBS]), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and isometric hip strength (extension [EXT], abduction [ABD], and external rotation [ER]) before and after the intervention. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Multivariate repeated-measures analyses of variance analyzed effects of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant group × time interaction existed for psychosocial outcomes (P = .008), but not for balance (P = .159), strength (P = .492), or ankle function and disability (P = .128). Time main effects existed for balance (P = .003), strength (P < .001), function and disability (P < .001), and psychosocial outcomes (P = .006). BAL significantly improved in SEBT, EXT, ABD, and all patient-reported outcomes. HIP significantly improved in EXT, ABD, ER, FAAM-S, mDPA, FABQ, and SEBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balance training and hip strengthening can both improve motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments in individuals with CAI; however, balance training remains the most effective option for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Progressive Balance and Hip Strengthening Rehabilitation in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley M B Suttmiller, Kelly R Johnson, Sunghoon Chung, Vanessa M Gruskiewicz, Niara N Foreman, Matthew C Reyes, Ryan S McCann\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments, including reduced balance performance, hip strength, and ankle function, and increased disablement, and injury-related fear. Progressive balance training (BAL) and hip strengthening (HIP) can both improve balance and function, but their comparative effects are unknown. Our objective was to compare the effects of progressive BAL and HIP on balance, hip strength, and patient-reported outcomes in those with CAI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five individuals with CAI volunteered for this randomized control study. Participants were randomly allocated to BAL, HIP, and control (CON) groups (n = 15 per group). BAL and HIP each participated in 8-week interventions while CON did not. Participants' involved limbs underwent testing of patient-reported outcomes (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM-ADL, FAAM-S], modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale [mDPA], Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 [TSK-11], Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ], and Self-Efficacy of Balance Scale [SEBS]), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and isometric hip strength (extension [EXT], abduction [ABD], and external rotation [ER]) before and after the intervention. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Multivariate repeated-measures analyses of variance analyzed effects of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant group × time interaction existed for psychosocial outcomes (P = .008), but not for balance (P = .159), strength (P = .492), or ankle function and disability (P = .128). Time main effects existed for balance (P = .003), strength (P < .001), function and disability (P < .001), and psychosocial outcomes (P = .006). BAL significantly improved in SEBT, EXT, ABD, and all patient-reported outcomes. HIP significantly improved in EXT, ABD, ER, FAAM-S, mDPA, FABQ, and SEBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balance training and hip strengthening can both improve motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments in individuals with CAI; however, balance training remains the most effective option for clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)与运动行为和感官知觉障碍有关,包括平衡能力、髋部力量和踝关节功能下降,以及残疾和与受伤有关的恐惧增加。渐进式平衡训练(BAL)和髋部力量训练(HIP)都能改善平衡和功能,但它们的比较效果尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较渐进式平衡训练和髋关节强化训练对 CAI 患者的平衡、髋关节力量和患者报告结果的影响:45名 CAI 患者自愿参加了这项随机对照研究。参与者被随机分配到 BAL 组、HIP 组和对照组(每组 15 人)。BAL组和HIP组分别参加为期8周的干预,而CON组不参加干预。参与者的受累肢体接受了患者报告结果测试(足踝能力测量[FAAM-ADL, FAAM-S]、改良体力活动障碍量表[mDPA]、坦帕运动恐惧量表-11[TSK-11])、在干预前和干预后,该研究还进行了 "恐惧-回避信念问卷"(Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ])、"平衡自我效能量表"(Self-Efficacy of Balance Scale [SEBS])、"星形激越平衡测试"(Star Excursion Balance Test [SEBT])和等长髋关节力量(伸展 [EXT]、外展 [ABD] 和外旋 [ER])的测试。对缺失数据采用多重估算。多变量重复测量方差分析了干预措施的效果:结果:在社会心理结果(P = .008)方面存在明显的组×时间交互作用,但在平衡(P = .159)、力量(P = .492)或踝关节功能和残疾(P = .128)方面不存在。平衡(P = .003)、力量(P < .001)、功能和残疾(P < .001)以及社会心理结果(P = .006)均存在时间主效应。BAL在SEBT、EXT、ABD和所有患者报告结果方面均有明显改善。HIP在EXT、ABD、ER、FAAM-S、mDPA、FABQ和SEBS方面均有明显改善:结论:平衡训练和髋关节强化训练都能改善 CAI 患者的运动行为障碍和感觉知觉障碍;但是,对于临床医生来说,平衡训练仍然是最有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Effects of Progressive Balance and Hip Strengthening Rehabilitation in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Context: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments, including reduced balance performance, hip strength, and ankle function, and increased disablement, and injury-related fear. Progressive balance training (BAL) and hip strengthening (HIP) can both improve balance and function, but their comparative effects are unknown. Our objective was to compare the effects of progressive BAL and HIP on balance, hip strength, and patient-reported outcomes in those with CAI.

Methods: Forty-five individuals with CAI volunteered for this randomized control study. Participants were randomly allocated to BAL, HIP, and control (CON) groups (n = 15 per group). BAL and HIP each participated in 8-week interventions while CON did not. Participants' involved limbs underwent testing of patient-reported outcomes (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM-ADL, FAAM-S], modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale [mDPA], Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 [TSK-11], Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ], and Self-Efficacy of Balance Scale [SEBS]), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and isometric hip strength (extension [EXT], abduction [ABD], and external rotation [ER]) before and after the intervention. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Multivariate repeated-measures analyses of variance analyzed effects of the interventions.

Results: A significant group × time interaction existed for psychosocial outcomes (P = .008), but not for balance (P = .159), strength (P = .492), or ankle function and disability (P = .128). Time main effects existed for balance (P = .003), strength (P < .001), function and disability (P < .001), and psychosocial outcomes (P = .006). BAL significantly improved in SEBT, EXT, ABD, and all patient-reported outcomes. HIP significantly improved in EXT, ABD, ER, FAAM-S, mDPA, FABQ, and SEBS.

Conclusions: Balance training and hip strengthening can both improve motor-behavioral and sensory-perceptual impairments in individuals with CAI; however, balance training remains the most effective option for clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信