最大限度地提高卒中治疗质量:报告国家卒中登记处的数据收集方法和资源配置:系统回顾。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Agnes Jonsson, Nicole Cosgrave, Anna Healy, Lisa Mellon, David J Williams, Anne Hickey
{"title":"最大限度地提高卒中治疗质量:报告国家卒中登记处的数据收集方法和资源配置:系统回顾。","authors":"Agnes Jonsson, Nicole Cosgrave, Anna Healy, Lisa Mellon, David J Williams, Anne Hickey","doi":"10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke registries are tools for improving care and advancing research. We aim to describe the methodology and resourcing of existing national stroke registries. We conducted a systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature and grey literature examining descriptions of data collection methods and resourcing of national stroke registries published from 2012 to 2023. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023393841). 101 records relating to 21 registries in 19 countries were identified. They universally employed web-based platforms for data collection. The principal profession of data collectors was nursing. All included the acute phase of care, 28% (6) registered the pre-hospital (ambulance) phase and 14% (3) included rehabilitation. 80% (17) collected outcome data. The registries varied in their approach to outcome data collection; in 9 registries it was collected by hospitals, in 2 it was collected by the registry, and 7 had linkage to national administrative databases allowing follow-up of a limited number of end points. Coverage of the total number of strokes varies from 6 to 95%. Despite widespread use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) the ability to automatically populate variables remained limited. Governance and management structures are diverse, making it challenging to compare their resourcing. Data collection for clinical registries requires time and necessary skills and imposes a significant administrative burden on the professionals entering data. We highlight the role of clinical registries as powerful instruments for quality improvement. Future work should involve creating a central repository of stroke registries to enable the development of new registries and facilitate international collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximising the Quality of Stroke Care: Reporting of Data Collection Methods and Resourcing in National Stroke Registries: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Jonsson, Nicole Cosgrave, Anna Healy, Lisa Mellon, David J Williams, Anne Hickey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stroke registries are tools for improving care and advancing research. We aim to describe the methodology and resourcing of existing national stroke registries. We conducted a systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature and grey literature examining descriptions of data collection methods and resourcing of national stroke registries published from 2012 to 2023. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023393841). 101 records relating to 21 registries in 19 countries were identified. They universally employed web-based platforms for data collection. The principal profession of data collectors was nursing. All included the acute phase of care, 28% (6) registered the pre-hospital (ambulance) phase and 14% (3) included rehabilitation. 80% (17) collected outcome data. The registries varied in their approach to outcome data collection; in 9 registries it was collected by hospitals, in 2 it was collected by the registry, and 7 had linkage to national administrative databases allowing follow-up of a limited number of end points. Coverage of the total number of strokes varies from 6 to 95%. Despite widespread use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) the ability to automatically populate variables remained limited. Governance and management structures are diverse, making it challenging to compare their resourcing. Data collection for clinical registries requires time and necessary skills and imposes a significant administrative burden on the professionals entering data. We highlight the role of clinical registries as powerful instruments for quality improvement. Future work should involve creating a central repository of stroke registries to enable the development of new registries and facilitate international collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卒中登记是改善护理和促进研究的工具。我们旨在描述现有国家卒中登记的方法和资源配置。我们对已发表的同行评议文献和灰色文献进行了系统检索,研究了 2012 年至 2023 年发表的国家卒中登记的数据收集方法和资源配置。该系统性综述已在 PROSPERO 中注册(CRD42023393841)。确定了 19 个国家 21 个登记处的 101 条记录。这些登记处普遍采用网络平台进行数据收集。数据收集者的主要职业是护士。所有登记都包括急性期护理,28%(6 份)登记了院前(救护车)护理,14%(3 份)包括康复护理。80%(17 个)收集了结果数据。登记处收集结果数据的方法各不相同:9 个登记处由医院收集结果数据,2 个登记处由登记处收集结果数据,7 个登记处与国家行政数据库建立了链接,可对有限的终点进行随访。脑卒中总数的覆盖率从 6% 到 95% 不等。尽管电子健康记录(EHR)得到了广泛应用,但自动填充变量的能力仍然有限。治理和管理结构各不相同,因此很难对其资源进行比较。临床登记处的数据收集工作需要时间和必要的技能,并给输入数据的专业人员带来沉重的行政负担。我们强调临床登记作为质量改进有力工具的作用。未来的工作应包括建立一个卒中登记中心资料库,以便开发新的登记中心并促进国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximising the Quality of Stroke Care: Reporting of Data Collection Methods and Resourcing in National Stroke Registries: A Systematic Review.

Stroke registries are tools for improving care and advancing research. We aim to describe the methodology and resourcing of existing national stroke registries. We conducted a systematic search of the published, peer-reviewed literature and grey literature examining descriptions of data collection methods and resourcing of national stroke registries published from 2012 to 2023. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023393841). 101 records relating to 21 registries in 19 countries were identified. They universally employed web-based platforms for data collection. The principal profession of data collectors was nursing. All included the acute phase of care, 28% (6) registered the pre-hospital (ambulance) phase and 14% (3) included rehabilitation. 80% (17) collected outcome data. The registries varied in their approach to outcome data collection; in 9 registries it was collected by hospitals, in 2 it was collected by the registry, and 7 had linkage to national administrative databases allowing follow-up of a limited number of end points. Coverage of the total number of strokes varies from 6 to 95%. Despite widespread use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) the ability to automatically populate variables remained limited. Governance and management structures are diverse, making it challenging to compare their resourcing. Data collection for clinical registries requires time and necessary skills and imposes a significant administrative burden on the professionals entering data. We highlight the role of clinical registries as powerful instruments for quality improvement. Future work should involve creating a central repository of stroke registries to enable the development of new registries and facilitate international collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信