开发并验证大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者在 CAR-T 三线或三线以上治疗进展后的 CAR 后预后指数。

IF 29.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Gloria Iacoboni, Víctor Navarro, Pierre Sesques, Kai Rejeski, Mariana Bastos-Oreiro, Fabio Serpenti, Ana Africa Martin Lopez, Josu Iraola-Truchuelo, Javier Delgado, Ariadna Perez, Manuel Guerreiro, Ana Carolina Caballero, Nuria Martinez-Cibrian, Hugo Luzardo Henriquez, Jose Maria Sanchez Pina, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Hervé Ghesquieres, Alberto Mussetti, Lucia Lopez Corral, Rafael Hernani, Juan Luis Reguera, Anna Sureda, Francesc Bosch, Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho, Mi Kwon, Marion Subklewe, Andrea Kuhnl, Emmanuel Bachy, Pere Barba, Guillermo Villacampa, Pau Abrisqueta
{"title":"开发并验证大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者在 CAR-T 三线或三线以上治疗进展后的 CAR 后预后指数。","authors":"Gloria Iacoboni, Víctor Navarro, Pierre Sesques, Kai Rejeski, Mariana Bastos-Oreiro, Fabio Serpenti, Ana Africa Martin Lopez, Josu Iraola-Truchuelo, Javier Delgado, Ariadna Perez, Manuel Guerreiro, Ana Carolina Caballero, Nuria Martinez-Cibrian, Hugo Luzardo Henriquez, Jose Maria Sanchez Pina, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Hervé Ghesquieres, Alberto Mussetti, Lucia Lopez Corral, Rafael Hernani, Juan Luis Reguera, Anna Sureda, Francesc Bosch, Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho, Mi Kwon, Marion Subklewe, Andrea Kuhnl, Emmanuel Bachy, Pere Barba, Guillermo Villacampa, Pau Abrisqueta","doi":"10.1186/s13045-024-01608-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH (≥ 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":29.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Iacoboni, Víctor Navarro, Pierre Sesques, Kai Rejeski, Mariana Bastos-Oreiro, Fabio Serpenti, Ana Africa Martin Lopez, Josu Iraola-Truchuelo, Javier Delgado, Ariadna Perez, Manuel Guerreiro, Ana Carolina Caballero, Nuria Martinez-Cibrian, Hugo Luzardo Henriquez, Jose Maria Sanchez Pina, Juan-Manuel Sancho, Hervé Ghesquieres, Alberto Mussetti, Lucia Lopez Corral, Rafael Hernani, Juan Luis Reguera, Anna Sureda, Francesc Bosch, Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho, Mi Kwon, Marion Subklewe, Andrea Kuhnl, Emmanuel Bachy, Pere Barba, Guillermo Villacampa, Pau Abrisqueta\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13045-024-01608-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH (≥ 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hematology & Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":29.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hematology & Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01608-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01608-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超过60%的复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者在接受嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法治疗三线或三线以上治疗后,未能获得持久的应答。CAR-T治疗失败后,患者的生存结果各不相同,目前还缺乏针对这一患者群体的预后模型。来自西班牙12个中心的216名CAR-T治疗后疾病进展(PD)患者组成了一个训练队列,用于开发CAR-T治疗后预后指数(PC-PI);主要终点是CAR-T治疗进展后的总生存期(OS)。在来自三个不同欧洲中心的外部队列(n = 204)中进行了验证。预后评分包含五个变量,在CAR-T进展时进行评估:ECOG(> 0)、血红蛋白(1)和从 CAR-T 到 PD 的时间((
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH (≥ 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hematology & Oncology, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research covering all aspects of hematology and oncology, including reviews and research highlights on "hot topics" by leading experts. Given the close relationship and rapid evolution of hematology and oncology, the journal aims to meet the demand for a dedicated platform for publishing discoveries from both fields. It serves as an international platform for sharing laboratory and clinical findings among laboratory scientists, physician scientists, hematologists, and oncologists in an open-access format. With a rapid turnaround time from submission to publication, the journal facilitates real-time sharing of knowledge and new successes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信