如果他们看到你流血,就会把你隔离起来":塞拉利昂爆发埃博拉疫情和 COVID-19 疫情期间妇女寻求暴力帮助的情况。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2024.2411572
Rose Burns, Neha Singh, Maseray Fofanah, Tehsie Momoh, Shelley Lees, Janet Seeley, Manuela Colombini
{"title":"如果他们看到你流血,就会把你隔离起来\":塞拉利昂爆发埃博拉疫情和 COVID-19 疫情期间妇女寻求暴力帮助的情况。","authors":"Rose Burns, Neha Singh, Maseray Fofanah, Tehsie Momoh, Shelley Lees, Janet Seeley, Manuela Colombini","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2024.2411572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increased awareness of the gendered impacts of outbreaks, including an exacerbation of violence against women and disruptions to essential health service delivery for women. However, there is limited understanding of women's own experiences of deciding to use the health system after experiencing violence in settings affected by major emergent outbreaks like Ebola and COVID-19. Drawing on data from 37 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions conducted in Sierra Leone we described survivors' help-seeking pathways and interactions with the health system. Deciding to seek help and selecting a source of support was dependant on how 'unacceptable' the type of violence was, women's needs (be they for physical, psychological or social trauma) and the risk versus benefit anticipated in accessing support. Informal providers such as local mediators were often the first place that survivors sought help. Pre-existing challenges around access and poor-quality service provision were exacerbated by the outbreaks. Fear of infection, quarantine and widespread distrust of the Ebola response shaped women's help-seeking especially if symptoms like bleeding could resemble the virus. Our findings support the need to re-orientate towards survivor-defined interventions that are flexible in providing a wider range of support choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"2411572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'If they see you bleeding they will quarantine you': Women's help-seeking for violence during the Ebola and COVID-19 outbreaks in Sierra Leone.\",\"authors\":\"Rose Burns, Neha Singh, Maseray Fofanah, Tehsie Momoh, Shelley Lees, Janet Seeley, Manuela Colombini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2024.2411572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is increased awareness of the gendered impacts of outbreaks, including an exacerbation of violence against women and disruptions to essential health service delivery for women. However, there is limited understanding of women's own experiences of deciding to use the health system after experiencing violence in settings affected by major emergent outbreaks like Ebola and COVID-19. Drawing on data from 37 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions conducted in Sierra Leone we described survivors' help-seeking pathways and interactions with the health system. Deciding to seek help and selecting a source of support was dependant on how 'unacceptable' the type of violence was, women's needs (be they for physical, psychological or social trauma) and the risk versus benefit anticipated in accessing support. Informal providers such as local mediators were often the first place that survivors sought help. Pre-existing challenges around access and poor-quality service provision were exacerbated by the outbreaks. Fear of infection, quarantine and widespread distrust of the Ebola response shaped women's help-seeking especially if symptoms like bleeding could resemble the virus. Our findings support the need to re-orientate towards survivor-defined interventions that are flexible in providing a wider range of support choices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"2411572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2411572\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2411572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们越来越意识到疫情爆发对性别的影响,包括加剧对妇女的暴力行为和中断为妇女提供的基本医疗服务。然而,人们对受埃博拉和 COVID-19 等重大突发疫情影响的环境中,妇女在遭受暴力侵害后决定使用医疗系统的亲身经历了解有限。根据在塞拉利昂进行的 37 次深入访谈和 4 次焦点小组讨论的数据,我们描述了幸存者寻求帮助的途径以及与医疗系统的互动。决定寻求帮助和选择支持来源取决于暴力类型的 "不可接受 "程度、妇女的需求(无论是身体、心理还是社会创伤)以及获得支持的风险与预期收益。地方调解员等非正规提供者往往是幸存者寻求帮助的第一站。疫情的爆发加剧了之前存在的有关获得服务和劣质服务的挑战。对感染的恐惧、隔离以及对埃博拉应对措施的普遍不信任影响了妇女的求助行为,尤其是当出血等症状与病毒相似时。我们的研究结果表明,有必要重新定位幸存者定义的干预措施,灵活地提供更广泛的支持选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'If they see you bleeding they will quarantine you': Women's help-seeking for violence during the Ebola and COVID-19 outbreaks in Sierra Leone.

There is increased awareness of the gendered impacts of outbreaks, including an exacerbation of violence against women and disruptions to essential health service delivery for women. However, there is limited understanding of women's own experiences of deciding to use the health system after experiencing violence in settings affected by major emergent outbreaks like Ebola and COVID-19. Drawing on data from 37 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions conducted in Sierra Leone we described survivors' help-seeking pathways and interactions with the health system. Deciding to seek help and selecting a source of support was dependant on how 'unacceptable' the type of violence was, women's needs (be they for physical, psychological or social trauma) and the risk versus benefit anticipated in accessing support. Informal providers such as local mediators were often the first place that survivors sought help. Pre-existing challenges around access and poor-quality service provision were exacerbated by the outbreaks. Fear of infection, quarantine and widespread distrust of the Ebola response shaped women's help-seeking especially if symptoms like bleeding could resemble the virus. Our findings support the need to re-orientate towards survivor-defined interventions that are flexible in providing a wider range of support choices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信