由研究者发起的奥拉帕利和替莫唑胺治疗SCLC的I/II期研究:最终分析和中枢神经系统结果

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Catherine B Meador, Subba R Digumarthy, Beow Y Yeap, Yin P Hung, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Anna F Farago, Rebecca S Heist, J Paul Marcoux, Deepa Rangachari, David A Barbie, Zofia Piotrowska
{"title":"由研究者发起的奥拉帕利和替莫唑胺治疗SCLC的I/II期研究:最终分析和中枢神经系统结果","authors":"Catherine B Meador, Subba R Digumarthy, Beow Y Yeap, Yin P Hung, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Anna F Farago, Rebecca S Heist, J Paul Marcoux, Deepa Rangachari, David A Barbie, Zofia Piotrowska","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temozolomide plus PARP inhibition has shown promise in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously reported outcomes from the first 50 patients (cohort 1) of a phase I/II trial of olaparib/temozolomide in recurrent SCLC. Here, we report a final analysis of this trial, including a second cohort with an alternate dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label phase I/II trial testing the combination of olaparib and temozolomide in relapsed SCLC. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints were safety, PFS, and OS. We tested escalating doses of olaparib/temozolomide across two cohorts, both of which had temozolomide dosed on D1-7 of each 21-days cycle. In previously published cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7; in cohort 2 olaparib was dosed continuously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients were enrolled across the two cohorts, 50 in cohort 1 and 16 in cohort 2. The confirmed ORR of cohort 1 was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable), and the confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable; closed after dose escalation to enrollment for lack of observed efficacy). Among 15/66 patients (22.7%) with untreated brain metastases at enrollment, best overall intracranial response was CR in 6/15 patients, PR in 4/15 patients, and SD in 3/15 patients for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Olaparib/temozolomide may be effective in relapsed SCLC, especially for patients with CNS disease. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination in SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase I/II Investigator-Initiated Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide in SCLC: Final Analysis and CNS Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine B Meador, Subba R Digumarthy, Beow Y Yeap, Yin P Hung, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Anna F Farago, Rebecca S Heist, J Paul Marcoux, Deepa Rangachari, David A Barbie, Zofia Piotrowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temozolomide plus PARP inhibition has shown promise in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously reported outcomes from the first 50 patients (cohort 1) of a phase I/II trial of olaparib/temozolomide in recurrent SCLC. Here, we report a final analysis of this trial, including a second cohort with an alternate dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label phase I/II trial testing the combination of olaparib and temozolomide in relapsed SCLC. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints were safety, PFS, and OS. We tested escalating doses of olaparib/temozolomide across two cohorts, both of which had temozolomide dosed on D1-7 of each 21-days cycle. In previously published cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7; in cohort 2 olaparib was dosed continuously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients were enrolled across the two cohorts, 50 in cohort 1 and 16 in cohort 2. The confirmed ORR of cohort 1 was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable), and the confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable; closed after dose escalation to enrollment for lack of observed efficacy). Among 15/66 patients (22.7%) with untreated brain metastases at enrollment, best overall intracranial response was CR in 6/15 patients, PR in 4/15 patients, and SD in 3/15 patients for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Olaparib/temozolomide may be effective in relapsed SCLC, especially for patients with CNS disease. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination in SCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2350\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:替莫唑胺加 PARP 抑制剂已在小细胞肺癌 (SCLC) 中显示出前景。我们之前报告了奥拉帕利/替莫唑胺治疗复发性SCLC的I/II期试验中前50例患者(第一组)的治疗结果。在此,我们报告了该试验的最终分析结果,包括采用替代给药策略的第二组患者以及中枢神经系统特异性结果的探索性分析:这是一项开放标签的I/II期试验,测试奥拉帕利和替莫唑胺联合治疗复发SCLC的效果。主要终点是ORR。次要终点为安全性、PFS和OS。我们在两个队列中测试了奥拉帕利/替莫唑胺的递增剂量,这两个队列都在每个21天周期的D1-7日使用替莫唑胺。在之前发表的队列 1 中,奥拉帕利的剂量为 D1-7;在队列 2 中,奥拉帕利的剂量为连续剂量:两个队列共招募了66名患者,其中队列1招募了50名,队列2招募了16名。组群 1 的确证 ORR 为 41.7%(20/48 可评估),组群 2 的确证 ORR 为 7%(1/14 可评估;因疗效观察不足,在剂量升级后终止入组)。在15/66例(22.7%)入组时有未经治疗的脑转移瘤的患者中,6/15例患者的最佳颅内总反应为CR,4/15例患者为PR,3/15例患者为SD,中枢神经系统疾病控制率为87%(95% CI:59.5-98.3%):结论:奥拉帕利/替莫唑胺可能对复发的SCLC有效,尤其是对中枢神经系统疾病患者。目前正在进行的有关最佳给药方案的分析将为今后在SCLC中使用这种联合疗法提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase I/II Investigator-Initiated Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide in SCLC: Final Analysis and CNS Outcomes.

Purpose: Temozolomide plus PARP inhibition has shown promise in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously reported outcomes from the first 50 patients (cohort 1) of a phase I/II trial of olaparib/temozolomide in recurrent SCLC. Here, we report a final analysis of this trial, including a second cohort with an alternate dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes.

Methods: This was an open-label phase I/II trial testing the combination of olaparib and temozolomide in relapsed SCLC. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints were safety, PFS, and OS. We tested escalating doses of olaparib/temozolomide across two cohorts, both of which had temozolomide dosed on D1-7 of each 21-days cycle. In previously published cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7; in cohort 2 olaparib was dosed continuously.

Results: Sixty-six patients were enrolled across the two cohorts, 50 in cohort 1 and 16 in cohort 2. The confirmed ORR of cohort 1 was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable), and the confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable; closed after dose escalation to enrollment for lack of observed efficacy). Among 15/66 patients (22.7%) with untreated brain metastases at enrollment, best overall intracranial response was CR in 6/15 patients, PR in 4/15 patients, and SD in 3/15 patients for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%).

Conclusions: Olaparib/temozolomide may be effective in relapsed SCLC, especially for patients with CNS disease. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination in SCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信