患者报告结果、术后疼痛和日间手术后疼痛缓解(POPPY):前瞻性多中心观察研究的方法。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/anae.16460
William M Hare, Martha Belete, Adam B Brayne, Harriet Daykin, Matthew Everson, Anna Ratcliffe, Katie Samuel, Lexy Sorrell, Mark Rockett
{"title":"患者报告结果、术后疼痛和日间手术后疼痛缓解(POPPY):前瞻性多中心观察研究的方法。","authors":"William M Hare, Martha Belete, Adam B Brayne, Harriet Daykin, Matthew Everson, Anna Ratcliffe, Katie Samuel, Lexy Sorrell, Mark Rockett","doi":"10.1111/anae.16460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, approximately 70% of surgical procedures are undertaken as day-cases. Little information exists about recovery from day-case surgery, yet international data highlights patients are at risk of developing significant longer-term health problems including chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use. The Patient-reported Outcomes, Postoperative Pain and pain relief after daY case surgery (POPPY) study was a national prospective multicentre observational study, measuring short- and longer-term patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a collaborative project led by resident anaesthetists under the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees umbrella. Adult day-case surgical patients were recruited on the day of surgery. Baseline data including patient characteristics; procedure details; pre-operative analgesic use; pre-existing pain; and quality of life scores were recorded. Patients were followed up through automated short message service messages. Short-term (postoperative days 1, 3 and 7) outcomes included: quality of recovery; pain severity; impact of pain on function; and analgesic use. Longer-term outcomes (postoperative day 97) included: quality of life; analgesic use; incidence of chronic post-surgical pain; and incidence persistent postoperative opioid use. Additional outcomes were completed by those patients with chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use, with 30 patients recruited to a qualitative semi-structured interview study exploring postoperative expectations, recovery, postoperative pain and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An embedded pilot study at four sites recruited 129 patients. Responses to the automated short message service were gained from 129 patients (100%) at day 1; 116 (89.9%) at day 3; 108 (83.7%) at day 7; and 77 (59.7%) at day 97 postoperatively. The pilot enabled refinement of the methods and processes before the national roll out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper outlines the methods for the POPPY study, the largest UK multicentre prospective observational study considering short- and longer-term outcomes following day-case surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day case surgery (POPPY): methodology for a prospective, multicentre observational study.\",\"authors\":\"William M Hare, Martha Belete, Adam B Brayne, Harriet Daykin, Matthew Everson, Anna Ratcliffe, Katie Samuel, Lexy Sorrell, Mark Rockett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, approximately 70% of surgical procedures are undertaken as day-cases. Little information exists about recovery from day-case surgery, yet international data highlights patients are at risk of developing significant longer-term health problems including chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use. The Patient-reported Outcomes, Postoperative Pain and pain relief after daY case surgery (POPPY) study was a national prospective multicentre observational study, measuring short- and longer-term patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a collaborative project led by resident anaesthetists under the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees umbrella. Adult day-case surgical patients were recruited on the day of surgery. Baseline data including patient characteristics; procedure details; pre-operative analgesic use; pre-existing pain; and quality of life scores were recorded. Patients were followed up through automated short message service messages. Short-term (postoperative days 1, 3 and 7) outcomes included: quality of recovery; pain severity; impact of pain on function; and analgesic use. Longer-term outcomes (postoperative day 97) included: quality of life; analgesic use; incidence of chronic post-surgical pain; and incidence persistent postoperative opioid use. Additional outcomes were completed by those patients with chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use, with 30 patients recruited to a qualitative semi-structured interview study exploring postoperative expectations, recovery, postoperative pain and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An embedded pilot study at four sites recruited 129 patients. Responses to the automated short message service were gained from 129 patients (100%) at day 1; 116 (89.9%) at day 3; 108 (83.7%) at day 7; and 77 (59.7%) at day 97 postoperatively. The pilot enabled refinement of the methods and processes before the national roll out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper outlines the methods for the POPPY study, the largest UK multicentre prospective observational study considering short- and longer-term outcomes following day-case surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16460\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在英国,约 70% 的外科手术都是日间手术。有关日间手术后恢复情况的信息很少,但国际数据显示,患者有可能出现严重的长期健康问题,包括术后慢性疼痛和术后持续使用阿片类药物。患者报告结果、术后疼痛和日间手术后疼痛缓解(POPPY)研究是一项全国性的前瞻性多中心观察研究,旨在测量患者报告的短期和长期结果、术后疼痛和日间手术后疼痛缓解情况:这是一个由住院麻醉师领导的合作项目,隶属于受训人员研究与审计联合会。成人日间手术患者在手术当天被招募。记录的基线数据包括患者特征、手术细节、术前镇痛剂使用情况、术前疼痛以及生活质量评分。通过自动短信服务对患者进行随访。短期(术后第 1、3 和 7 天)结果包括:恢复质量、疼痛严重程度、疼痛对功能的影响以及镇痛剂使用情况。长期结果(术后第 97 天)包括:生活质量;镇痛剂使用情况;术后慢性疼痛发生率;术后持续使用阿片类药物发生率。有术后慢性疼痛和术后持续使用阿片类药物的患者还完成了其他结果,有30名患者被招募参加半结构式定性访谈研究,探讨术后期望、恢复、术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用:在四个地点进行的嵌入式试点研究共招募了 129 名患者。术后第 1 天,129 名患者(100%)回复了自动短信服务;术后第 3 天,116 名患者(89.9%)回复;术后第 7 天,108 名患者(83.7%)回复;术后第 97 天,77 名患者(59.7%)回复。通过试点,在全国推广前对方法和流程进行了改进:本文概述了 POPPY 研究的方法,该研究是英国最大的多中心前瞻性观察研究,考虑了日间手术后的短期和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day case surgery (POPPY): methodology for a prospective, multicentre observational study.

Background: In the UK, approximately 70% of surgical procedures are undertaken as day-cases. Little information exists about recovery from day-case surgery, yet international data highlights patients are at risk of developing significant longer-term health problems including chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use. The Patient-reported Outcomes, Postoperative Pain and pain relief after daY case surgery (POPPY) study was a national prospective multicentre observational study, measuring short- and longer-term patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery.

Methods: This was a collaborative project led by resident anaesthetists under the Research and Audit Federation of Trainees umbrella. Adult day-case surgical patients were recruited on the day of surgery. Baseline data including patient characteristics; procedure details; pre-operative analgesic use; pre-existing pain; and quality of life scores were recorded. Patients were followed up through automated short message service messages. Short-term (postoperative days 1, 3 and 7) outcomes included: quality of recovery; pain severity; impact of pain on function; and analgesic use. Longer-term outcomes (postoperative day 97) included: quality of life; analgesic use; incidence of chronic post-surgical pain; and incidence persistent postoperative opioid use. Additional outcomes were completed by those patients with chronic post-surgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use, with 30 patients recruited to a qualitative semi-structured interview study exploring postoperative expectations, recovery, postoperative pain and opioid use.

Results: An embedded pilot study at four sites recruited 129 patients. Responses to the automated short message service were gained from 129 patients (100%) at day 1; 116 (89.9%) at day 3; 108 (83.7%) at day 7; and 77 (59.7%) at day 97 postoperatively. The pilot enabled refinement of the methods and processes before the national roll out.

Conclusion: This paper outlines the methods for the POPPY study, the largest UK multicentre prospective observational study considering short- and longer-term outcomes following day-case surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信