Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward
{"title":"数字 AVATAR 疗法治疗精神病患者的痛苦声音:第 2/3 期 AVATAR2 试验","authors":"Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.035, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, <i>P</i> = 0.029, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, <i>P</i> = 0.316, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, <i>P</i> = 0.175, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.</p>","PeriodicalId":58,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7810,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Philippa A. Garety, Clementine J. Edwards, Hassan Jafari, Richard Emsley, Mark Huckvale, Mar Rus-Calafell, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Andrew Gumley, Gillian Haddock, Sandra Bucci, Hamish J. McLeod, Jeffrey McDonnell, Moya Clancy, Michael Fitzsimmons, Hannah Ball, Alice Montague, Nikos Xanidis, Amy Hardy, Thomas K. J. Craig, Thomas Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, <i>P</i> = 0.035, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, <i>P</i> = 0.029, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, <i>P</i> = 0.316, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, <i>P</i> = 0.175, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":58,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7810,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial
Distressing voices are a core symptom of psychosis, for which existing treatments are currently suboptimal; as such, new effective treatments for distressing voices are needed. AVATAR therapy involves voice-hearers engaging in a series of facilitated dialogues with a digital embodiment of the distressing voice. This randomized phase 2/3 trial assesses the efficacy of two forms of AVATAR therapy, AVATAR-Brief (AV-BRF) and AVATAR-Extended (AV-EXT), both combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone, and conducted an intention-to-treat analysis. We recruited 345 participants with psychosis; data were available for 300 participants (86.9%) at 16 weeks and 298 (86.4%) at 28 weeks. The primary outcome was voice-related distress at both time points, while voice severity and voice frequency were key secondary outcomes. Voice-related distress improved, compared with TAU, in both forms at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks. Distress at 16 weeks was as follows: AV-BRF, effect −1.05 points, 96.5% confidence interval (CI) = −2.110 to 0, P = 0.035, Cohen’s d = 0.38 (CI = 0 to 0.767); AV-EXT −1.60 points, 96.5% CI = −3.133 to −0.058, P = 0.029, Cohen’s d = 0.58 (CI = 0.021 to 1.139). Distress at 28 weeks was: AV-BRF, −0.62 points, 96.5% CI = −1.912 to 0.679, P = 0.316, Cohen’s d = 0.22 (CI = −0.247 to 0.695); AV-EXT −1.06 points, 96.5% CI = −2.700 to 0.586, P = 0.175, Cohen’s d = 0.38 (CI = −0.213 to 0.981). Voice severity improved in both forms, compared with TAU, at 16 weeks but not at 28 weeks whereas frequency was reduced in AV-EXT but not in AV-BRF at both time points. There were no related serious adverse events. These findings provide partial support for our primary hypotheses. AV-EXT met our threshold for a clinically significant change, suggesting that future work should be primarily guided by this protocol. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN55682735.