采用深度学习方法的实时太阳耀斑预报系统

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Pengchao Yan, Xuebao Li, Yanfang Zheng, Liang Dong, Shuainan Yan, Shunhuang Zhang, Hongwei Ye, Xuefeng Li, Yongshang Lü, Yi Ling, Xusheng Huang, Yexin Pan
{"title":"采用深度学习方法的实时太阳耀斑预报系统","authors":"Pengchao Yan,&nbsp;Xuebao Li,&nbsp;Yanfang Zheng,&nbsp;Liang Dong,&nbsp;Shuainan Yan,&nbsp;Shunhuang Zhang,&nbsp;Hongwei Ye,&nbsp;Xuefeng Li,&nbsp;Yongshang Lü,&nbsp;Yi Ling,&nbsp;Xusheng Huang,&nbsp;Yexin Pan","doi":"10.1007/s10509-024-04374-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we develop five deep learning models, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, a CNN model with Squeeze-and-Excitation Attention(CNN-SE), a CNN model with Convolutional Block Attention Module (CNN-CBAM), a CNN model with Efficient Channel Attention (CNN-ECA), and a Vision Transformer (ViT) model, for predicting whether ≥C or ≥M-class solar flares occurring within 24 hours. We build a real-time forecasting system using these five models, which can achieve classification and probability forecasting. The 10-fold cross-validation sets are generated in chronological order using the full-disk magnetograms provided by the <i>Solar Dynamics Observatory</i>/<i>Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager</i> at 00:00 UT from May 1, 2010, to March 31, 2023. Then after training, validation, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistic (TSS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) as assessment metrics. The major results are as follows: (1) There are no statistically significant differences in TSS and BSS performance between models with attention mechanisms and the CNN model. (2) For ≥C-class flare prediction, the Recall of the ViT model reaches 0.833, significantly better than that of the CNN model. For ≥M-class flare prediction, the Recall of the CNN-ECA and ViT models are 0.799 and 0.855, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CNN model. (3) We develop a full-disk solar flare prediction system that has been running since May 1, 2023. By December 31, all five models achieve a TSS of 0.984 for predicting ≥C-class flares, with the CNN-SE model demonstrating a BSS of 0.939. For ≥M-class flares, the CNN-SE model achieves a TSS of 0.304, while the BSS values for the CNN and CNN-SE models are 0.019 and 0.018, respectively. Additionally, the prediction performance for ≥M-class flares on the testing set without No-flare class samples, is similar to that of real-time predictions, validating the good generation performance of the model in real-time forecasting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"369 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A real-time solar flare forecasting system with deep learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Pengchao Yan,&nbsp;Xuebao Li,&nbsp;Yanfang Zheng,&nbsp;Liang Dong,&nbsp;Shuainan Yan,&nbsp;Shunhuang Zhang,&nbsp;Hongwei Ye,&nbsp;Xuefeng Li,&nbsp;Yongshang Lü,&nbsp;Yi Ling,&nbsp;Xusheng Huang,&nbsp;Yexin Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10509-024-04374-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we develop five deep learning models, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, a CNN model with Squeeze-and-Excitation Attention(CNN-SE), a CNN model with Convolutional Block Attention Module (CNN-CBAM), a CNN model with Efficient Channel Attention (CNN-ECA), and a Vision Transformer (ViT) model, for predicting whether ≥C or ≥M-class solar flares occurring within 24 hours. We build a real-time forecasting system using these five models, which can achieve classification and probability forecasting. The 10-fold cross-validation sets are generated in chronological order using the full-disk magnetograms provided by the <i>Solar Dynamics Observatory</i>/<i>Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager</i> at 00:00 UT from May 1, 2010, to March 31, 2023. Then after training, validation, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistic (TSS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) as assessment metrics. The major results are as follows: (1) There are no statistically significant differences in TSS and BSS performance between models with attention mechanisms and the CNN model. (2) For ≥C-class flare prediction, the Recall of the ViT model reaches 0.833, significantly better than that of the CNN model. For ≥M-class flare prediction, the Recall of the CNN-ECA and ViT models are 0.799 and 0.855, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CNN model. (3) We develop a full-disk solar flare prediction system that has been running since May 1, 2023. By December 31, all five models achieve a TSS of 0.984 for predicting ≥C-class flares, with the CNN-SE model demonstrating a BSS of 0.939. For ≥M-class flares, the CNN-SE model achieves a TSS of 0.304, while the BSS values for the CNN and CNN-SE models are 0.019 and 0.018, respectively. Additionally, the prediction performance for ≥M-class flares on the testing set without No-flare class samples, is similar to that of real-time predictions, validating the good generation performance of the model in real-time forecasting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"369 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04374-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04374-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们开发了五个深度学习模型,分别是卷积神经网络(CNN)模型、具有挤压和激发注意力(CNN-SE)的CNN模型、具有卷积块注意力模块(CNN-CBAM)的CNN模型、具有高效通道注意力(CNN-ECA)的CNN模型和视觉转换器(ViT)模型,用于预测24小时内发生的≥C级或≥M级太阳耀斑。我们利用这五个模型建立了一个实时预报系统,可以实现分类和概率预报。利用太阳动力学天文台/高地震和磁成像仪提供的从 2010 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 31 日 00:00 UT 的全磁盘磁图,按时间顺序生成 10 倍交叉验证集。然后,在对模型进行训练、验证和测试之后,我们将结果与真实技能统计量(TSS)和布赖尔技能得分(BSS)作为评估指标进行比较。主要结果如下(1) 具有注意力机制的模型与 CNN 模型在 TSS 和 BSS 性能上没有显著的统计学差异。(2)对于≥C 级耀斑预测,ViT 模型的 Recall 达到 0.833,明显优于 CNN 模型。对于≥M 级耀斑预测,CNN-ECA 模型和 ViT 模型的 Recall 分别为 0.799 和 0.855,明显高于 CNN 模型。(3) 我们开发的全盘太阳耀斑预测系统自 2023 年 5 月 1 日开始运行。到 12 月 31 日,五个模型预测≥C 级耀斑的 TSS 均达到 0.984,其中 CNN-SE 模型的 BSS 为 0.939。对于≥M 级耀斑,CNN-SE 模型的 TSS 值为 0.304,而 CNN 和 CNN-SE 模型的 BSS 值分别为 0.019 和 0.018。此外,在无耀斑类样本的测试集上,≥M 级耀斑的预测性能与实时预测性能相似,验证了该模型在实时预测中的良好生成性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A real-time solar flare forecasting system with deep learning methods

In this study, we develop five deep learning models, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, a CNN model with Squeeze-and-Excitation Attention(CNN-SE), a CNN model with Convolutional Block Attention Module (CNN-CBAM), a CNN model with Efficient Channel Attention (CNN-ECA), and a Vision Transformer (ViT) model, for predicting whether ≥C or ≥M-class solar flares occurring within 24 hours. We build a real-time forecasting system using these five models, which can achieve classification and probability forecasting. The 10-fold cross-validation sets are generated in chronological order using the full-disk magnetograms provided by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager at 00:00 UT from May 1, 2010, to March 31, 2023. Then after training, validation, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistic (TSS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) as assessment metrics. The major results are as follows: (1) There are no statistically significant differences in TSS and BSS performance between models with attention mechanisms and the CNN model. (2) For ≥C-class flare prediction, the Recall of the ViT model reaches 0.833, significantly better than that of the CNN model. For ≥M-class flare prediction, the Recall of the CNN-ECA and ViT models are 0.799 and 0.855, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CNN model. (3) We develop a full-disk solar flare prediction system that has been running since May 1, 2023. By December 31, all five models achieve a TSS of 0.984 for predicting ≥C-class flares, with the CNN-SE model demonstrating a BSS of 0.939. For ≥M-class flares, the CNN-SE model achieves a TSS of 0.304, while the BSS values for the CNN and CNN-SE models are 0.019 and 0.018, respectively. Additionally, the prediction performance for ≥M-class flares on the testing set without No-flare class samples, is similar to that of real-time predictions, validating the good generation performance of the model in real-time forecasting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astrophysics and Space Science
Astrophysics and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered. The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing. Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信