大鼠从空间距离到社会距离的信息传递:后顶叶皮层在空间-社会整合中的作用。

Taylor B Wise, Victoria L Templer, Rebecca D Burwell
{"title":"大鼠从空间距离到社会距离的信息传递:后顶叶皮层在空间-社会整合中的作用。","authors":"Taylor B Wise, Victoria L Templer, Rebecca D Burwell","doi":"10.1101/2024.10.14.618305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans and other social animals can represent and navigate complex networks of social relationships in ways that are suggestive of representation and navigation in space. There is some evidence that cortical regions initially required for processing space have been adapted to include processing of social information. One candidate region for supporting both spatial and social information processing is the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). We examined the hypothesis that rats can transfer or generalize distance information across spatial and social domains and that this phenomenon requires the PPC. In a novel apparatus, rats learned to discriminate two conspecifics positioned at different spatial distances (near vs. far) in a goal-driven paradigm. Following spatial learning, subjects were tested on probe trials in which spatial distance was replaced with social distance (cagemate vs. less familiar conspecific). The PPC was chemogenetically inactivated during a subset of probe sessions. We predicted that, in control probe trials, subjects would select conspecifics whose social distance matched the previously learned spatial distance. That is, if trained on the near distance, the rat would choose the highly familiar cagemate, and if trained on the far distance, the rat would choose the less familiar conspecific. Subjects learned to discriminate conspecifics based on spatial distance in our goal-driven paradigm. Moreover, choice for the appropriate social distance in the first probe session was significantly higher than chance. This result suggests that rats transferred learned spatial information to social contexts. Contrary to our predictions, PPC inactivation did not impair spatial to social information transfer. Possible reasons are discussed. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that spatial and social distance are processed by shared cognitive mechanisms in the rat model.</p>","PeriodicalId":519960,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information transfer from spatial to social distance in rats: implications for the role of the posterior parietal cortex in spatial-social integration.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor B Wise, Victoria L Templer, Rebecca D Burwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.10.14.618305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humans and other social animals can represent and navigate complex networks of social relationships in ways that are suggestive of representation and navigation in space. There is some evidence that cortical regions initially required for processing space have been adapted to include processing of social information. One candidate region for supporting both spatial and social information processing is the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). We examined the hypothesis that rats can transfer or generalize distance information across spatial and social domains and that this phenomenon requires the PPC. In a novel apparatus, rats learned to discriminate two conspecifics positioned at different spatial distances (near vs. far) in a goal-driven paradigm. Following spatial learning, subjects were tested on probe trials in which spatial distance was replaced with social distance (cagemate vs. less familiar conspecific). The PPC was chemogenetically inactivated during a subset of probe sessions. We predicted that, in control probe trials, subjects would select conspecifics whose social distance matched the previously learned spatial distance. That is, if trained on the near distance, the rat would choose the highly familiar cagemate, and if trained on the far distance, the rat would choose the less familiar conspecific. Subjects learned to discriminate conspecifics based on spatial distance in our goal-driven paradigm. Moreover, choice for the appropriate social distance in the first probe session was significantly higher than chance. This result suggests that rats transferred learned spatial information to social contexts. Contrary to our predictions, PPC inactivation did not impair spatial to social information transfer. Possible reasons are discussed. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that spatial and social distance are processed by shared cognitive mechanisms in the rat model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507766/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.14.618305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.14.618305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类和其他社会动物能够以暗示空间表征和导航的方式表征和导航复杂的社会关系网络。有证据表明,最初处理空间所需的皮层区域已被调整为包括处理社会信息。同时支持空间和社会信息处理的一个候选区域是后顶叶皮层(PPC)。我们研究了这样一个假设:大鼠可以在空间和社会领域中转移或概括距离信息,而这一现象需要顶叶后皮层的支持。在一个新颖的装置中,大鼠在目标驱动范式中学会了分辨位于不同空间距离(近距离与远距离)的两个同种动物。在空间学习之后,受试者接受了探究试验测试,在这些试验中,空间距离被社会距离(笼友与不太熟悉的同类)所取代。在一部分探究试验中,PPC 被化学失活。我们预测,在对照探究试验中,受试者会选择社会距离与之前学习到的空间距离相匹配的同类。也就是说,如果接受的是近距离训练,大鼠会选择非常熟悉的笼友;如果接受的是远距离训练,大鼠会选择不太熟悉的同类。在我们的目标驱动范式中,受试者学会了根据空间距离来区分同类。此外,在第一个探究环节中,大鼠对适当社会距离的选择明显高于偶然性。这一结果表明,大鼠将学习到的空间信息转移到了社会环境中。与我们的预测相反,PPC 失活并没有影响空间信息向社会信息的转移。本文讨论了可能的原因。据我们所知,这是首次在大鼠模型中提供证据证明空间距离和社会距离是由共同的认知机制处理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information transfer from spatial to social distance in rats: implications for the role of the posterior parietal cortex in spatial-social integration.

Humans and other social animals can represent and navigate complex networks of social relationships in ways that are suggestive of representation and navigation in space. There is some evidence that cortical regions initially required for processing space have been adapted to include processing of social information. One candidate region for supporting both spatial and social information processing is the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). We examined the hypothesis that rats can transfer or generalize distance information across spatial and social domains and that this phenomenon requires the PPC. In a novel apparatus, rats learned to discriminate two conspecifics positioned at different spatial distances (near vs. far) in a goal-driven paradigm. Following spatial learning, subjects were tested on probe trials in which spatial distance was replaced with social distance (cagemate vs. less familiar conspecific). The PPC was chemogenetically inactivated during a subset of probe sessions. We predicted that, in control probe trials, subjects would select conspecifics whose social distance matched the previously learned spatial distance. That is, if trained on the near distance, the rat would choose the highly familiar cagemate, and if trained on the far distance, the rat would choose the less familiar conspecific. Subjects learned to discriminate conspecifics based on spatial distance in our goal-driven paradigm. Moreover, choice for the appropriate social distance in the first probe session was significantly higher than chance. This result suggests that rats transferred learned spatial information to social contexts. Contrary to our predictions, PPC inactivation did not impair spatial to social information transfer. Possible reasons are discussed. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that spatial and social distance are processed by shared cognitive mechanisms in the rat model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信