Eduardo Fernández, Carlos Vásquez, Luis Urrutia, Casandra Jara, Carlos Veas, Mauricio Chandía
{"title":"[智利一家公立医院脑脊液流式细胞术免疫分型和细胞学对急性白血病诊断效用的评估]。","authors":"Eduardo Fernández, Carlos Vásquez, Luis Urrutia, Casandra Jara, Carlos Veas, Mauricio Chandía","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of blast cell presence in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in acute leukemias (AL) is made using techniques such as flow cytometry (FCM) and conventional cytology (CC). This study aims to evaluate CSF blast cell presence frequency in LA using both techniques (CC and FCM) in our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed three hundred and eight CSF samples belonging to 175 patients, 57% male, with a median age of 46 years (1-70 years) were analyzed. Diagnoses were acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, 84%), acute T lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL 5%), acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML, 11%). The immunophenotype was performed with an 8-color panel adapted to the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of non-assessable CSF samples in LA was higher for CC (46%) than FCM (4%) (p<0.05). Overall, infiltration was found in 78/308 samples by FCM (25.3%) and in 8/77 by CC (10.4%) (p<0.0001). Seventy of 259 samples were positive in B-ALL (27%) and 6/34 in AML (17%). There were no CC+ cases in AML or T-ALL. The samples that were FCM+/CC+ had more significant infiltration (59.5%) than CMF+/CC-ones (30%) (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMF detects more than twice as many CSF blast-positive cases in LA as CC and is, therefore, suitable for routine use along with CC.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 3","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Assessment of the Diagnostic Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping and Cytology in Acute Leukemias at a Public Chilean Hospital].\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Fernández, Carlos Vásquez, Luis Urrutia, Casandra Jara, Carlos Veas, Mauricio Chandía\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024000300376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnosis of blast cell presence in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in acute leukemias (AL) is made using techniques such as flow cytometry (FCM) and conventional cytology (CC). This study aims to evaluate CSF blast cell presence frequency in LA using both techniques (CC and FCM) in our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed three hundred and eight CSF samples belonging to 175 patients, 57% male, with a median age of 46 years (1-70 years) were analyzed. Diagnoses were acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, 84%), acute T lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL 5%), acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML, 11%). The immunophenotype was performed with an 8-color panel adapted to the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of non-assessable CSF samples in LA was higher for CC (46%) than FCM (4%) (p<0.05). Overall, infiltration was found in 78/308 samples by FCM (25.3%) and in 8/77 by CC (10.4%) (p<0.0001). Seventy of 259 samples were positive in B-ALL (27%) and 6/34 in AML (17%). There were no CC+ cases in AML or T-ALL. The samples that were FCM+/CC+ had more significant infiltration (59.5%) than CMF+/CC-ones (30%) (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMF detects more than twice as many CSF blast-positive cases in LA as CC and is, therefore, suitable for routine use along with CC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 3\",\"pages\":\"376-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000300376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
急性白血病(AL)患者脑脊液(CSF)中存在囊泡细胞的诊断需要使用流式细胞术(FCM)和传统细胞学(CC)等技术。本研究旨在评估本中心使用这两种技术(CC 和 FCM)检测的 LA 脑脊液爆炸细胞出现频率:我们分析了 175 名患者的 38 份 CSF 样本,其中 57% 为男性,中位年龄为 46 岁(1-70 岁)。诊断结果为急性B淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL,84%)、急性T淋巴细胞白血病(T-ALL,5%)和急性髓细胞白血病(AML,11%)。免疫分型是根据诊断结果采用 8 色板进行的:结果:在 LA 中,CC(46%)不可评估的 CSF 样本比例高于 FCM(4%)(p 结论:CMF 在 LA 中检测到的 CSF 爆炸阳性病例是 CC 的两倍多,因此适合与 CC 一起常规使用。
[Assessment of the Diagnostic Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping and Cytology in Acute Leukemias at a Public Chilean Hospital].
The diagnosis of blast cell presence in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in acute leukemias (AL) is made using techniques such as flow cytometry (FCM) and conventional cytology (CC). This study aims to evaluate CSF blast cell presence frequency in LA using both techniques (CC and FCM) in our center.
Methods: We analyzed three hundred and eight CSF samples belonging to 175 patients, 57% male, with a median age of 46 years (1-70 years) were analyzed. Diagnoses were acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, 84%), acute T lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL 5%), acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML, 11%). The immunophenotype was performed with an 8-color panel adapted to the diagnosis.
Results: The proportion of non-assessable CSF samples in LA was higher for CC (46%) than FCM (4%) (p<0.05). Overall, infiltration was found in 78/308 samples by FCM (25.3%) and in 8/77 by CC (10.4%) (p<0.0001). Seventy of 259 samples were positive in B-ALL (27%) and 6/34 in AML (17%). There were no CC+ cases in AML or T-ALL. The samples that were FCM+/CC+ had more significant infiltration (59.5%) than CMF+/CC-ones (30%) (p<0.0001).
Conclusions: CMF detects more than twice as many CSF blast-positive cases in LA as CC and is, therefore, suitable for routine use along with CC.