定性数据分析、解释和报告的模式建议:情境性、反思性和叙述性。

Mehmet Ali Gülpınar
{"title":"定性数据分析、解释和报告的模式建议:情境性、反思性和叙述性。","authors":"Mehmet Ali Gülpınar","doi":"10.1017/S1463423624000562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>From education to healthcare and management processes, it is important to address the experience in health within its own complexity, context, and uniqueness. At this point, qualitative studies come to the fore and this increases the need for practical guides and models for qualitative studies. Qualitative studies have a paradigm that is different from quantitative research and its paradigm ontologically, epistemologically, and methodologically. These differences are reflected in the design of the research as well as the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data. From such a point of view, this paper first briefly outlines the design process of qualitative studies and then proposes a model for the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Conceptual/theoretical framework: </strong>The three core concepts of the model are 'contextuality', 'reflectivity', and 'narrativity'. Such a conceptual/theoretical framework transforms qualitative data analysis, interpretation, and reporting processes into processes that are carried out with a reflective approach within their specific contexts.</p><p><strong>Model: </strong>Taking this into account, by considering a contextual, reflective, and narrative approach, two frameworks, namely, the 'Contextual (Multiple) Reading and Analysis Framework' consisting of three stages and seven steps, and the 'Contextual Understanding, Interpretation and Reporting Framework' consisting of four stages, were developed. This provides a practical guide to contextual and reflective data analysis, interpretation, and reporting for the use of those conducting qualitative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model proposal for qualitative data analysis, interpretation, and reporting: contextuality, reflectivity, and narrativity.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Ali Gülpınar\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423624000562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>From education to healthcare and management processes, it is important to address the experience in health within its own complexity, context, and uniqueness. At this point, qualitative studies come to the fore and this increases the need for practical guides and models for qualitative studies. Qualitative studies have a paradigm that is different from quantitative research and its paradigm ontologically, epistemologically, and methodologically. These differences are reflected in the design of the research as well as the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data. From such a point of view, this paper first briefly outlines the design process of qualitative studies and then proposes a model for the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Conceptual/theoretical framework: </strong>The three core concepts of the model are 'contextuality', 'reflectivity', and 'narrativity'. Such a conceptual/theoretical framework transforms qualitative data analysis, interpretation, and reporting processes into processes that are carried out with a reflective approach within their specific contexts.</p><p><strong>Model: </strong>Taking this into account, by considering a contextual, reflective, and narrative approach, two frameworks, namely, the 'Contextual (Multiple) Reading and Analysis Framework' consisting of three stages and seven steps, and the 'Contextual Understanding, Interpretation and Reporting Framework' consisting of four stages, were developed. This provides a practical guide to contextual and reflective data analysis, interpretation, and reporting for the use of those conducting qualitative studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"e55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:从教育到医疗保健和管理过程,重要的是要根据其自身的复杂性、背景和独特性来处理健康方面的经验。此时,定性研究就显得尤为重要,这就更加需要定性研究的实用指南和模型。定性研究的范式在本体论、认识论和方法论上都不同于定量研究及其范式。这些差异体现在研究设计以及定性数据的分析、解释和报告中。从这个角度出发,本文首先简要概述了定性研究的设计过程,然后提出了一个分析、解释和报告定性数据的模型:该模式的三个核心概念是 "情境性"、"反思性 "和 "叙述性"。这种概念/理论框架将定性数据的分析、解释和报告过程转化为在特定情境中以反思方法进行的过程:有鉴于此,通过考虑情境、反思和叙事方法,制定了两个框架,即由三个阶段和七个步骤组成的 "情境(多重)阅读和分析框架",以及由四个阶段组成的 "情境理解、解释和报告框架"。这为开展定性研究的人员提供了背景和反思性数据分析、解释和报告的实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A model proposal for qualitative data analysis, interpretation, and reporting: contextuality, reflectivity, and narrativity.

Rationale: From education to healthcare and management processes, it is important to address the experience in health within its own complexity, context, and uniqueness. At this point, qualitative studies come to the fore and this increases the need for practical guides and models for qualitative studies. Qualitative studies have a paradigm that is different from quantitative research and its paradigm ontologically, epistemologically, and methodologically. These differences are reflected in the design of the research as well as the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data. From such a point of view, this paper first briefly outlines the design process of qualitative studies and then proposes a model for the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of qualitative data.

Conceptual/theoretical framework: The three core concepts of the model are 'contextuality', 'reflectivity', and 'narrativity'. Such a conceptual/theoretical framework transforms qualitative data analysis, interpretation, and reporting processes into processes that are carried out with a reflective approach within their specific contexts.

Model: Taking this into account, by considering a contextual, reflective, and narrative approach, two frameworks, namely, the 'Contextual (Multiple) Reading and Analysis Framework' consisting of three stages and seven steps, and the 'Contextual Understanding, Interpretation and Reporting Framework' consisting of four stages, were developed. This provides a practical guide to contextual and reflective data analysis, interpretation, and reporting for the use of those conducting qualitative studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信