基于电子健康记录数据的持续、失控高血压和高血压危机预测模型:算法开发与验证。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Hieu Minh Nguyen, William Anderson, Shih-Hsiung Chou, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, Nicholas Pajewski, Yhenneko Taylor
{"title":"基于电子健康记录数据的持续、失控高血压和高血压危机预测模型:算法开发与验证。","authors":"Hieu Minh Nguyen, William Anderson, Shih-Hsiung Chou, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, Nicholas Pajewski, Yhenneko Taylor","doi":"10.2196/58732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing disease progression among patients with uncontrolled hypertension is important for identifying opportunities for intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to develop and validate 2 models, one to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension (≥2 blood pressure [BP] readings ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) and one to predict hypertensive crisis (≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) within 1 year of an index visit (outpatient or ambulatory encounter in which an uncontrolled BP reading was recorded).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 142,897 patients with uncontrolled hypertension within Atrium Health Greater Charlotte in 2018 were used. Electronic health record-based predictors were based on the 1-year period before a patient's index visit. The dataset was randomly split (80:20) into a training set and a validation set. In total, 4 machine learning frameworks were considered: L2-regularized logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting machines, and random forest. Model selection was performed with 10-fold cross-validation. The final models were assessed on discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (eg, integrated calibration index), and net benefit (with decision curve analysis). Additionally, internal-external cross-validation was performed at the county level to assess performance with new populations and summarized using random-effect meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In internal validation, the C-statistic and integrated calibration index were 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.72) and 0.015 (95% CI 0.012-0.020) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) and 0.009 (95% CI 0.007-0.011) for the hypertensive crisis model. The models had higher net benefit than the default policies (ie, treat-all and treat-none) across different decision thresholds. In internal-external cross-validation, the pooled performance was consistent with internal validation results; in particular, the pooled C-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model and hypertensive crisis model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An electronic health record-based model predicted hypertensive crisis reasonably well in internal and internal-external validations. The model can potentially be used to support population health surveillance and hypertension management. Further studies are needed to improve the ability to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"12 ","pages":"e58732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Models for Sustained, Uncontrolled Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Hieu Minh Nguyen, William Anderson, Shih-Hsiung Chou, Andrew McWilliams, Jing Zhao, Nicholas Pajewski, Yhenneko Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/58732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing disease progression among patients with uncontrolled hypertension is important for identifying opportunities for intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to develop and validate 2 models, one to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension (≥2 blood pressure [BP] readings ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) and one to predict hypertensive crisis (≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) within 1 year of an index visit (outpatient or ambulatory encounter in which an uncontrolled BP reading was recorded).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 142,897 patients with uncontrolled hypertension within Atrium Health Greater Charlotte in 2018 were used. Electronic health record-based predictors were based on the 1-year period before a patient's index visit. The dataset was randomly split (80:20) into a training set and a validation set. In total, 4 machine learning frameworks were considered: L2-regularized logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting machines, and random forest. Model selection was performed with 10-fold cross-validation. The final models were assessed on discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (eg, integrated calibration index), and net benefit (with decision curve analysis). Additionally, internal-external cross-validation was performed at the county level to assess performance with new populations and summarized using random-effect meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In internal validation, the C-statistic and integrated calibration index were 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.72) and 0.015 (95% CI 0.012-0.020) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) and 0.009 (95% CI 0.007-0.011) for the hypertensive crisis model. The models had higher net benefit than the default policies (ie, treat-all and treat-none) across different decision thresholds. In internal-external cross-validation, the pooled performance was consistent with internal validation results; in particular, the pooled C-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model and hypertensive crisis model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An electronic health record-based model predicted hypertensive crisis reasonably well in internal and internal-external validations. The model can potentially be used to support population health surveillance and hypertension management. Further studies are needed to improve the ability to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e58732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/58732\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估未受控制的高血压患者的疾病进展对于确定干预机会非常重要:评估未得到控制的高血压患者的疾病进展对于确定干预机会非常重要:我们旨在开发并验证 2 个模型,一个用于预测持续、未控制的高血压(≥2 次血压 [BP] 读数≥140/90mmHg 或≥1 次血压读数≥180/120mmHg),另一个用于预测指数就诊(记录有未控制血压读数的门诊或非住院就诊)后 1 年内的高血压危象(≥1 次血压读数≥180/120mmHg):采用2018年Atrium Health大夏洛特地区142897名未控制高血压患者的数据。基于电子健康记录的预测因子基于患者指数就诊前的 1 年时间。数据集随机(80:20)分为训练集和验证集。总共考虑了 4 种机器学习框架:L2- 规则化逻辑回归、多层感知器、梯度提升机和随机森林。模型选择采用 10 倍交叉验证。对最终模型的判别(C 统计量)、校准(如综合校准指数)和净效益(决策曲线分析)进行了评估。此外,还在县一级进行了内部-外部交叉验证,以评估新人群的表现,并使用随机效应荟萃分析进行总结:在内部验证中,持续未控制高血压模型的 C 统计量和综合校准指数分别为 0.72(95% CI 0.71-0.72)和 0.015(95% CI 0.012-0.020),高血压危机模型的 C 统计量和综合校准指数分别为 0.81(95% CI 0.79-0.82)和 0.009(95% CI 0.007-0.011)。在不同的决策阈值下,这些模型的净效益均高于默认政策(即 "全部治疗 "和 "不治疗")。在内部-外部交叉验证中,汇总结果与内部验证结果一致;特别是,持续、未控制的高血压模型和高血压危机模型的汇总C统计量分别为0.70(95% CI 0.69-0.71)和0.79(95% CI 0.78-0.81):基于电子健康记录的模型在内部和内外部验证中对高血压危象的预测效果相当好。该模型可用于支持人群健康监测和高血压管理。要提高预测持续、失控高血压的能力,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Models for Sustained, Uncontrolled Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Background: Assessing disease progression among patients with uncontrolled hypertension is important for identifying opportunities for intervention.

Objective: We aim to develop and validate 2 models, one to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension (≥2 blood pressure [BP] readings ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) and one to predict hypertensive crisis (≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) within 1 year of an index visit (outpatient or ambulatory encounter in which an uncontrolled BP reading was recorded).

Methods: Data from 142,897 patients with uncontrolled hypertension within Atrium Health Greater Charlotte in 2018 were used. Electronic health record-based predictors were based on the 1-year period before a patient's index visit. The dataset was randomly split (80:20) into a training set and a validation set. In total, 4 machine learning frameworks were considered: L2-regularized logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting machines, and random forest. Model selection was performed with 10-fold cross-validation. The final models were assessed on discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (eg, integrated calibration index), and net benefit (with decision curve analysis). Additionally, internal-external cross-validation was performed at the county level to assess performance with new populations and summarized using random-effect meta-analyses.

Results: In internal validation, the C-statistic and integrated calibration index were 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.72) and 0.015 (95% CI 0.012-0.020) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) and 0.009 (95% CI 0.007-0.011) for the hypertensive crisis model. The models had higher net benefit than the default policies (ie, treat-all and treat-none) across different decision thresholds. In internal-external cross-validation, the pooled performance was consistent with internal validation results; in particular, the pooled C-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model and hypertensive crisis model, respectively.

Conclusions: An electronic health record-based model predicted hypertensive crisis reasonably well in internal and internal-external validations. The model can potentially be used to support population health surveillance and hypertension management. Further studies are needed to improve the ability to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信