Young Ju Oh, Hyo Kee Kim, Jee Hyun Park, Cheol Woong Jung, Heungman Jun
{"title":"优化前臂环动静脉移植的静脉吻合:对终末期肾病患者肘静脉和上臂基底静脉的比较分析。","authors":"Young Ju Oh, Hyo Kee Kim, Jee Hyun Park, Cheol Woong Jung, Heungman Jun","doi":"10.1177/11297298241291695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimizing vascular access for hemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease is crucial. While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for better patency and fewer complications, many patients require alternatives options like arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) due to anatomical constraints. This study compares outcomes between elbow and upper arm (UA) basilic veins for forearm loop AVGs, highlighting the potential benefits of the UA basilic vein to improve patency and feasibility in patients with poor elbow veins through retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 59 limbs of patients who underwent forearm loop AVG formation from January 2018 to June 2022. Elbow veins (basilic, median cubital, brachial) and UA basilic veins were evaluated for suitability using duplex ultrasonography. AVG decisions were based on patient age, health, and vein diameter (⩾2.3 mm). Statistical analyses compared baseline characteristics and evaluated primary and secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months using Pearson's chi-square, Student's <i>t</i>-test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the Log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients had elbow anastomosis, while 23 had UA anastomosis for forearm loop AVG. The elbow group had a higher male proportion (72.7% vs 34.7% in UA, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and larger elbow vein diameters (2.52 ± 0.19 mm vs 2.16 ± 0.21 mm in UA, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Primary patency rates at 12 months were 72.7% for elbow and 56.2% for UA; at 18 months, 59.4% and 25.5%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.376). Secondary patency rates at 12 months were 75.7% for elbow and 62.2% for UA; at 18 months, 67.8% and 33.9%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.238).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary and secondary patency rates of forearm loop AVG with UA basilic vein anastomosis were not inferior to those with elbow veins anastomosis. UA basilic vein can be a feasible alternative for creating forearm loop AVG when elbow veins are not suitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1577-1581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing venous anastomosis for forearm loop arteriovenous grafts: A comparative analysis of elbow veins and upper arm basilic veins in end-stage kidney disease patients.\",\"authors\":\"Young Ju Oh, Hyo Kee Kim, Jee Hyun Park, Cheol Woong Jung, Heungman Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241291695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimizing vascular access for hemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease is crucial. While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for better patency and fewer complications, many patients require alternatives options like arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) due to anatomical constraints. This study compares outcomes between elbow and upper arm (UA) basilic veins for forearm loop AVGs, highlighting the potential benefits of the UA basilic vein to improve patency and feasibility in patients with poor elbow veins through retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 59 limbs of patients who underwent forearm loop AVG formation from January 2018 to June 2022. Elbow veins (basilic, median cubital, brachial) and UA basilic veins were evaluated for suitability using duplex ultrasonography. AVG decisions were based on patient age, health, and vein diameter (⩾2.3 mm). Statistical analyses compared baseline characteristics and evaluated primary and secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months using Pearson's chi-square, Student's <i>t</i>-test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the Log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients had elbow anastomosis, while 23 had UA anastomosis for forearm loop AVG. The elbow group had a higher male proportion (72.7% vs 34.7% in UA, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and larger elbow vein diameters (2.52 ± 0.19 mm vs 2.16 ± 0.21 mm in UA, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Primary patency rates at 12 months were 72.7% for elbow and 56.2% for UA; at 18 months, 59.4% and 25.5%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.376). Secondary patency rates at 12 months were 75.7% for elbow and 62.2% for UA; at 18 months, 67.8% and 33.9%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.238).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary and secondary patency rates of forearm loop AVG with UA basilic vein anastomosis were not inferior to those with elbow veins anastomosis. UA basilic vein can be a feasible alternative for creating forearm loop AVG when elbow veins are not suitable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1577-1581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241291695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241291695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:优化终末期肾病患者血液透析的血管通路至关重要。虽然动静脉瘘(AVF)因通畅性更好、并发症更少而受到青睐,但由于解剖结构的限制,许多患者需要动静脉移植(AVG)等替代方案。本研究比较了肘部和上臂(UA)基底静脉用于前臂环形 AVG 的效果,通过回顾性分析强调了 UA 基底静脉在改善肘部静脉不畅患者的通畅性和可行性方面的潜在优势:这项回顾性研究分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间接受前臂环形 AVG 形成术的 59 例患者的肢体。使用双相超声波检查评估了肘静脉(基底静脉、肘正中静脉、肱静脉)和 UA 基底静脉的适用性。根据患者的年龄、健康状况和静脉直径(⩾2.3 毫米)决定是否进行 AVG。统计分析比较了基线特征,并使用皮尔逊卡方检验、学生 t 检验、Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Log-rank 检验评估了 12 个月和 18 个月的一次和二次通畅率:结果:36 名患者进行了肘部吻合术,23 名患者进行了前臂环形 AVG 的 UA 吻合术。肘部组男性比例更高(72.7% 对 UA 组的 34.7%,P = 0.005),肘部静脉直径更大(2.52 ± 0.19 mm 对 UA 组的 2.16 ± 0.21 mm,P = 0.376)。12个月时,肘静脉的二次通畅率为75.7%,UA为62.2%;18个月时,分别为67.8%和33.9%(P = 0.238):结论:前臂环路 AVG 与 UA 基底静脉吻合的一次和二次通畅率并不比与肘静脉吻合的低。当肘部静脉不适用时,UA 基底静脉是建立前臂环形 AVG 的可行替代方案。
Optimizing venous anastomosis for forearm loop arteriovenous grafts: A comparative analysis of elbow veins and upper arm basilic veins in end-stage kidney disease patients.
Introduction: Optimizing vascular access for hemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease is crucial. While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for better patency and fewer complications, many patients require alternatives options like arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) due to anatomical constraints. This study compares outcomes between elbow and upper arm (UA) basilic veins for forearm loop AVGs, highlighting the potential benefits of the UA basilic vein to improve patency and feasibility in patients with poor elbow veins through retrospective analysis.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 59 limbs of patients who underwent forearm loop AVG formation from January 2018 to June 2022. Elbow veins (basilic, median cubital, brachial) and UA basilic veins were evaluated for suitability using duplex ultrasonography. AVG decisions were based on patient age, health, and vein diameter (⩾2.3 mm). Statistical analyses compared baseline characteristics and evaluated primary and secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months using Pearson's chi-square, Student's t-test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the Log-rank test.
Results: Thirty-six patients had elbow anastomosis, while 23 had UA anastomosis for forearm loop AVG. The elbow group had a higher male proportion (72.7% vs 34.7% in UA, p = 0.005) and larger elbow vein diameters (2.52 ± 0.19 mm vs 2.16 ± 0.21 mm in UA, p < 0.001). Primary patency rates at 12 months were 72.7% for elbow and 56.2% for UA; at 18 months, 59.4% and 25.5%, respectively (p = 0.376). Secondary patency rates at 12 months were 75.7% for elbow and 62.2% for UA; at 18 months, 67.8% and 33.9%, respectively (p = 0.238).
Conclusion: The primary and secondary patency rates of forearm loop AVG with UA basilic vein anastomosis were not inferior to those with elbow veins anastomosis. UA basilic vein can be a feasible alternative for creating forearm loop AVG when elbow veins are not suitable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.