应用理论、模型和框架,帮助遗传咨询师和学生实现临床和专业目标。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Deborah Cragun, Lindsey Victoria, Angela R. Bradbury, Marleah Dean, Jada G. Hamilton, Mira L. Katz, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Jennifer W. Mack, Ken Resnicow, Kimberly A. Kaphingst
{"title":"应用理论、模型和框架,帮助遗传咨询师和学生实现临床和专业目标。","authors":"Deborah Cragun,&nbsp;Lindsey Victoria,&nbsp;Angela R. Bradbury,&nbsp;Marleah Dean,&nbsp;Jada G. Hamilton,&nbsp;Mira L. Katz,&nbsp;Alanna Kulchak Rahm,&nbsp;Jennifer W. Mack,&nbsp;Ken Resnicow,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Kaphingst","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Cragun,&nbsp;Lindsey Victoria,&nbsp;Angela R. Bradbury,&nbsp;Marleah Dean,&nbsp;Jada G. Hamilton,&nbsp;Mira L. Katz,&nbsp;Alanna Kulchak Rahm,&nbsp;Jennifer W. Mack,&nbsp;Ken Resnicow,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Kaphingst\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.1988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.1988\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.1988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些遗传咨询师(GCs)可能会发现理论、模型和框架(TMFs)在临床技能选择以及反思或评估遗传咨询实践时非常有用。本文旨在展示如何利用 TMF 来推测不同的技能如何影响患者/客户的决定、行为和结果,并考虑如何利用多种 TMF 来指导使用各种技能或策略以实现不同的目标。此外,我们还举例说明了在非临床工作(如实施和评估新的干预措施或服务提供模式)中可能对全球保健人员有所帮助的 TMF。为指导选择合适的 TMF,我们提供了一系列需要考虑的问题,并举例说明了与不同 TMF 相符的技能和方法。虽然 TMF 提供了结构化的方法和宝贵的指导,可能有助于推进遗传咨询实践,但它们也有一定的局限性。有必要开展更多研究,以确定使用 TMF 指导临床实践和改善患者/客户结果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals

Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信