种族与偶发前列腺癌的发病率、特征和死亡率的关系:对两个北美当代队列的分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1002/pros.24803
Marco Finati, Chase Morrison, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Shane Tinsley, Matthew Davis, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Craig Rogers, Giuseppe Carrieri, Firas Abdollah
{"title":"种族与偶发前列腺癌的发病率、特征和死亡率的关系:对两个北美当代队列的分析。","authors":"Marco Finati, Chase Morrison, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Shane Tinsley, Matthew Davis, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Craig Rogers, Giuseppe Carrieri, Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1002/pros.24803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men are at higher risk both for incidence and mortality from prostate cancer (PCa) compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men, but these findings arise from biopsy-detected PCa reports. We aimed to compare the incidence, subsequent management and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of incidental PCa among NHB and NHW men, using two different North American cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER: 2004-2017) and our institutional Henry Ford Health (HFH: 1995-2022) databases were queried to identify men diagnosed with incidental PCa. Cumulative incidence estimates were used to calculate CSM differences between NHB and NHW men. Competing-risk multivariable regression analysis tested the impact of race on CSM, after accounting for all available covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 418 and 6,124 incidental PCa cases were recorded in HFH and SEER database respectively. No pathological differences were observed between NHB and NHW men in both the cohorts, except for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at diagnosis, which was higher in NHB men. At 10-years, the CSM rates were 5.5% vs 7.2% in our cohort and 8.6% vs 10.3% in the SEER cohort for NHW and NHB men, respectively (all Gray's test p-value > 0.05). At multivariable, race was not an independent predictor of CSM in our HFH cohort (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.57-3.71, p = 0.6). In the SEER cohort, NHB men were 34% less likely to die from PCa from 1 year to the next (95% CI: 0.49-0.90, p = 0.008), when compared with NHW men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the comparison of incidental PCa findings between NHB and NHW men, both groups had similar pathological characteristic and survival outcomes. These findings are different from the 'conventional' screening-detected PCa and suggest that racial differences have minimal to no adverse effects on PCa-specific mortality after incidental diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"e24803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of race with incidence, characteristics, and mortality from incidental prostate cancer: Analysis of two North American contemporary cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Finati, Chase Morrison, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Shane Tinsley, Matthew Davis, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Craig Rogers, Giuseppe Carrieri, Firas Abdollah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.24803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men are at higher risk both for incidence and mortality from prostate cancer (PCa) compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men, but these findings arise from biopsy-detected PCa reports. We aimed to compare the incidence, subsequent management and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of incidental PCa among NHB and NHW men, using two different North American cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER: 2004-2017) and our institutional Henry Ford Health (HFH: 1995-2022) databases were queried to identify men diagnosed with incidental PCa. Cumulative incidence estimates were used to calculate CSM differences between NHB and NHW men. Competing-risk multivariable regression analysis tested the impact of race on CSM, after accounting for all available covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 418 and 6,124 incidental PCa cases were recorded in HFH and SEER database respectively. No pathological differences were observed between NHB and NHW men in both the cohorts, except for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at diagnosis, which was higher in NHB men. At 10-years, the CSM rates were 5.5% vs 7.2% in our cohort and 8.6% vs 10.3% in the SEER cohort for NHW and NHB men, respectively (all Gray's test p-value > 0.05). At multivariable, race was not an independent predictor of CSM in our HFH cohort (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.57-3.71, p = 0.6). In the SEER cohort, NHB men were 34% less likely to die from PCa from 1 year to the next (95% CI: 0.49-0.90, p = 0.008), when compared with NHW men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the comparison of incidental PCa findings between NHB and NHW men, both groups had similar pathological characteristic and survival outcomes. These findings are different from the 'conventional' screening-detected PCa and suggest that racial differences have minimal to no adverse effects on PCa-specific mortality after incidental diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e24803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与非西班牙裔白人(NHW)男性相比,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)男性患前列腺癌(PCa)的风险和死亡率都更高,但这些研究结果都是通过活检发现的PCa报告得出的。我们的目的是利用两个不同的北美队列,比较非西班牙裔白种人和非西班牙裔白种人中偶发 PCa 的发病率、后续处理和癌症特异性死亡率(CSM):方法:我们查询了监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(SEER:2004-2017 年)和本机构的亨利福特健康数据库(HFH:1995-2022 年),以确定诊断为偶发性 PCa 的男性。累积发病率估计值用于计算NHB和NHW男性之间的CSM差异。在考虑了所有可用的协变量后,竞争风险多变量回归分析检验了种族对CSM的影响:HFH和SEER数据库分别记录了418例和6124例偶发性PCa病例。除了确诊时的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值在非华裔男性中较高外,这两个队列中的非华裔男性和非华裔男性在病理学上没有差异。10年后,我们队列中的NHW和NHB男性的CSM率分别为5.5%对7.2%,SEER队列中的CSM率分别为8.6%对10.3%(所有格雷氏检验P值均大于0.05)。在我们的 HFH 队列中,种族不是 CSM 的独立预测因素(HR:1.46,95% CI:0.57-3.71,P = 0.6)。在SEER队列中,与NHW男性相比,NHB男性在一年内死于PCa的可能性降低了34%(95% CI:0.49-0.90,P = 0.008):结论:在对NHB和NHW男性偶然发现的PCa进行比较时,两组男性的病理特征和生存结果相似。这些发现与 "传统 "筛查发现的 PCa 不同,表明种族差异对偶然诊断后 PCa 特异性死亡率的不利影响很小,甚至没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of race with incidence, characteristics, and mortality from incidental prostate cancer: Analysis of two North American contemporary cohorts.

Background: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) men are at higher risk both for incidence and mortality from prostate cancer (PCa) compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men, but these findings arise from biopsy-detected PCa reports. We aimed to compare the incidence, subsequent management and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of incidental PCa among NHB and NHW men, using two different North American cohorts.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result (SEER: 2004-2017) and our institutional Henry Ford Health (HFH: 1995-2022) databases were queried to identify men diagnosed with incidental PCa. Cumulative incidence estimates were used to calculate CSM differences between NHB and NHW men. Competing-risk multivariable regression analysis tested the impact of race on CSM, after accounting for all available covariates.

Results: A total of 418 and 6,124 incidental PCa cases were recorded in HFH and SEER database respectively. No pathological differences were observed between NHB and NHW men in both the cohorts, except for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at diagnosis, which was higher in NHB men. At 10-years, the CSM rates were 5.5% vs 7.2% in our cohort and 8.6% vs 10.3% in the SEER cohort for NHW and NHB men, respectively (all Gray's test p-value > 0.05). At multivariable, race was not an independent predictor of CSM in our HFH cohort (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.57-3.71, p = 0.6). In the SEER cohort, NHB men were 34% less likely to die from PCa from 1 year to the next (95% CI: 0.49-0.90, p = 0.008), when compared with NHW men.

Conclusions: In the comparison of incidental PCa findings between NHB and NHW men, both groups had similar pathological characteristic and survival outcomes. These findings are different from the 'conventional' screening-detected PCa and suggest that racial differences have minimal to no adverse effects on PCa-specific mortality after incidental diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信