Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh
{"title":"在 COVID-19 期间,游览公园对澳大利亚人的体育活动、幸福感和社会联系的影响。","authors":"Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daae137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项横断面研究考察了冠状病毒疾病 2019 年大流行期间 1089 名参与者游览公园与身体活动(PA)、幸福感和社会联系的关系。2020 年 8 月,澳大利亚的青少年和成年人自我报告了人口统计数据、通常游览的公园、游览公园的频率和持续时间、体育活动、幸福感和社会联系。多层次线性回归模型检验了公园游览与幸福感和社会联系的关系。多层次混合效应负二项式回归模型检验了游览与活动量之间的关系。与不游览公园相比,游览公园与幸福感(B = 3.92,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.24,6.60)和每天/周进行 30 分钟 PA 的天数(B = 1.24,95% 置信区间 = 1.11,1.39)呈正相关,与社会联系呈负相关(B = -3.75,95% 置信区间 = -7.11,-0.39)。与每周去公园少于一次相比,每周去公园一次与幸福感呈正相关(B = 3.90,95% CI = 0.53,7.21)。每周游览一次以上与每天进行 30 分钟(B = 1.37,95% CI = 1.21,1.58)和 60 分钟(B = 1.34,95% CI = 1.09,1.64)体育锻炼的天数/周数以及幸福感呈正相关(B = 4.19,95% CI = 0.90,7.49)。游览公园的持续时间与每天/周进行 30 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.04,1.13)和 60 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.02,1.17)体育锻炼的天数呈正相关。我们的研究结果强调了公园在积极影响健康相关结果方面的作用,以及使用公园对健康有益所需的 "剂量"。
Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.
This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.