在 COVID-19 期间,游览公园对澳大利亚人的体育活动、幸福感和社会联系的影响。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh
{"title":"在 COVID-19 期间,游览公园对澳大利亚人的体育活动、幸福感和社会联系的影响。","authors":"Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daae137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面研究考察了冠状病毒疾病 2019 年大流行期间 1089 名参与者游览公园与身体活动(PA)、幸福感和社会联系的关系。2020 年 8 月,澳大利亚的青少年和成年人自我报告了人口统计数据、通常游览的公园、游览公园的频率和持续时间、体育活动、幸福感和社会联系。多层次线性回归模型检验了公园游览与幸福感和社会联系的关系。多层次混合效应负二项式回归模型检验了游览与活动量之间的关系。与不游览公园相比,游览公园与幸福感(B = 3.92,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.24,6.60)和每天/周进行 30 分钟 PA 的天数(B = 1.24,95% 置信区间 = 1.11,1.39)呈正相关,与社会联系呈负相关(B = -3.75,95% 置信区间 = -7.11,-0.39)。与每周去公园少于一次相比,每周去公园一次与幸福感呈正相关(B = 3.90,95% CI = 0.53,7.21)。每周游览一次以上与每天进行 30 分钟(B = 1.37,95% CI = 1.21,1.58)和 60 分钟(B = 1.34,95% CI = 1.09,1.64)体育锻炼的天数/周数以及幸福感呈正相关(B = 4.19,95% CI = 0.90,7.49)。游览公园的持续时间与每天/周进行 30 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.04,1.13)和 60 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.02,1.17)体育锻炼的天数呈正相关。我们的研究结果强调了公园在积极影响健康相关结果方面的作用,以及使用公园对健康有益所需的 "剂量"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.

This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信