Mor Rittblat, Nir Tsur, Adi Karas, Sami Gendler, Zivan Beer, Irina Radomislensky, Ofer Almog, Avishai M Tsur, Guy Avital, Tomer Talmy
{"title":"在院前创伤护理中何时选择鞘内通路？以色列国防军的登记研究。","authors":"Mor Rittblat, Nir Tsur, Adi Karas, Sami Gendler, Zivan Beer, Irina Radomislensky, Ofer Almog, Avishai M Tsur, Guy Avital, Tomer Talmy","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prompt vascular access is crucial for resuscitating bleeding trauma casualties in prehospital settings but achieving peripheral intravenous (PIV) access can be challenging during hemorrhagic shock due to peripheral vessel collapse. Early intraosseous (IO) device use is suggested as an alternative. This study examines injury characteristics and factors linked to IO access requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry-based cohort study from the Israel Defense Forces Trauma Registry (2010 - 2023) included trauma casualties receiving PIV or IO access prehospital. Casualties who had at least one documented PIV or IO access attempt were included, while those without vascular access were excluded. Casualties requiring both PIV and IO were classified in the IO group. Univariable logistic regression assessed the factors associated with IO access. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and significant difference was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3462 casualties (86.3% male, the median age: 22 years), 3287 (94.9%) received PIV access and 175 (5.1%) had IO access attempts. In the IO group, 30.3% received freeze-dried plasma and 23.4% received low titer group O whole blood, significantly higher than that in the PIV group. Prehospital mortality was 35.0% in the IO group. Univariable analysis showed significant associations with IO access for increased PIV attempts (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.13) and signs of profound shock (OR = 11.0; 95% CI: 5.5 - 23.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Profound shock signs are strongly linked to the need for IO access in prehospital settings with each successive PIV attempt increasing the likelihood of requiring IO conversion. IO access often accompanies low titer group O whole blood or freeze-dried plasma administration and higher prehospital mortality, indicating its use in emergent resuscitation situations. Early IO consideration is advised for trauma casualties with profound shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When to choose intraosseous access in prehospital trauma care: A registry-based study from the Israel Defense Forces.\",\"authors\":\"Mor Rittblat, Nir Tsur, Adi Karas, Sami Gendler, Zivan Beer, Irina Radomislensky, Ofer Almog, Avishai M Tsur, Guy Avital, Tomer Talmy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prompt vascular access is crucial for resuscitating bleeding trauma casualties in prehospital settings but achieving peripheral intravenous (PIV) access can be challenging during hemorrhagic shock due to peripheral vessel collapse. Early intraosseous (IO) device use is suggested as an alternative. This study examines injury characteristics and factors linked to IO access requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry-based cohort study from the Israel Defense Forces Trauma Registry (2010 - 2023) included trauma casualties receiving PIV or IO access prehospital. Casualties who had at least one documented PIV or IO access attempt were included, while those without vascular access were excluded. Casualties requiring both PIV and IO were classified in the IO group. Univariable logistic regression assessed the factors associated with IO access. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and significant difference was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3462 casualties (86.3% male, the median age: 22 years), 3287 (94.9%) received PIV access and 175 (5.1%) had IO access attempts. In the IO group, 30.3% received freeze-dried plasma and 23.4% received low titer group O whole blood, significantly higher than that in the PIV group. Prehospital mortality was 35.0% in the IO group. Univariable analysis showed significant associations with IO access for increased PIV attempts (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.13) and signs of profound shock (OR = 11.0; 95% CI: 5.5 - 23.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Profound shock signs are strongly linked to the need for IO access in prehospital settings with each successive PIV attempt increasing the likelihood of requiring IO conversion. IO access often accompanies low titer group O whole blood or freeze-dried plasma administration and higher prehospital mortality, indicating its use in emergent resuscitation situations. Early IO consideration is advised for trauma casualties with profound shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
When to choose intraosseous access in prehospital trauma care: A registry-based study from the Israel Defense Forces.
Purpose: Prompt vascular access is crucial for resuscitating bleeding trauma casualties in prehospital settings but achieving peripheral intravenous (PIV) access can be challenging during hemorrhagic shock due to peripheral vessel collapse. Early intraosseous (IO) device use is suggested as an alternative. This study examines injury characteristics and factors linked to IO access requirements.
Methods: A registry-based cohort study from the Israel Defense Forces Trauma Registry (2010 - 2023) included trauma casualties receiving PIV or IO access prehospital. Casualties who had at least one documented PIV or IO access attempt were included, while those without vascular access were excluded. Casualties requiring both PIV and IO were classified in the IO group. Univariable logistic regression assessed the factors associated with IO access. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and significant difference was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Of 3462 casualties (86.3% male, the median age: 22 years), 3287 (94.9%) received PIV access and 175 (5.1%) had IO access attempts. In the IO group, 30.3% received freeze-dried plasma and 23.4% received low titer group O whole blood, significantly higher than that in the PIV group. Prehospital mortality was 35.0% in the IO group. Univariable analysis showed significant associations with IO access for increased PIV attempts (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.13) and signs of profound shock (OR = 11.0; 95% CI: 5.5 - 23.3).
Conclusion: Profound shock signs are strongly linked to the need for IO access in prehospital settings with each successive PIV attempt increasing the likelihood of requiring IO conversion. IO access often accompanies low titer group O whole blood or freeze-dried plasma administration and higher prehospital mortality, indicating its use in emergent resuscitation situations. Early IO consideration is advised for trauma casualties with profound shock.
期刊介绍：
Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
