关于预防中心静脉导管移除相关空气栓塞的知识和实践:非重症监护病房医护人员调查。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001287
Maria Karlinskaya, Liad Scharf, Nadav Sarid
{"title":"关于预防中心静脉导管移除相关空气栓塞的知识和实践:非重症监护病房医护人员调查。","authors":"Maria Karlinskaya, Liad Scharf, Nadav Sarid","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Air embolism is a potentially serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. While CVC insertion is usually performed by a trained specialist, extraction is frequently the responsibility of junior staff members. This complication can be easily prevented by following several simple measures described in common guidelines.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We conducted a single-center survey to assess knowledge and practices concerning the prevention of air embolism associated with CVC removal among healthcare workers from nonintensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The correct answers to the questionnaire were determined according to best-practice recommendations for CVC removal. Based on a comparison of the total sum of correct answers between the categories of groups, factors that predicted the level of knowledge were identified using an independent sample t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 156 respondents, one-third were unfamiliar with air embolism as a complication of CVC extraction. Almost 80% were unaware of the existence of a CVC removal protocol. Almost half of respondents did not follow guidelines regarding patient position when removing a CVC, 72% did not ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver during the procedure, and 54% did not ask the patient to remain supine after the procedure. Adherence to the protocol was correlated with professional experience, with a lower level among those with experience of less than 1 year and, particularly, among interns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey revealed inappropriately low awareness of CVC removal-associated air embolism risk and low familiarity with CVC removal best-practice recommendations among nonintensive care unit healthcare workers. Staff members with experience of less than 1 year, including interns, were found to have a lower level of knowledge. These findings emphasize the importance of development and distribution an internal hospital protocol and the integration of educational intervention into a preliminary internship program.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"571-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and Practices Regarding Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Removal-Associated Air Embolism: A Survey of Nonintensive Care Unit Medical and Nursing Staff.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Karlinskaya, Liad Scharf, Nadav Sarid\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Air embolism is a potentially serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. While CVC insertion is usually performed by a trained specialist, extraction is frequently the responsibility of junior staff members. This complication can be easily prevented by following several simple measures described in common guidelines.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We conducted a single-center survey to assess knowledge and practices concerning the prevention of air embolism associated with CVC removal among healthcare workers from nonintensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The correct answers to the questionnaire were determined according to best-practice recommendations for CVC removal. Based on a comparison of the total sum of correct answers between the categories of groups, factors that predicted the level of knowledge were identified using an independent sample t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 156 respondents, one-third were unfamiliar with air embolism as a complication of CVC extraction. Almost 80% were unaware of the existence of a CVC removal protocol. Almost half of respondents did not follow guidelines regarding patient position when removing a CVC, 72% did not ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver during the procedure, and 54% did not ask the patient to remain supine after the procedure. Adherence to the protocol was correlated with professional experience, with a lower level among those with experience of less than 1 year and, particularly, among interns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey revealed inappropriately low awareness of CVC removal-associated air embolism risk and low familiarity with CVC removal best-practice recommendations among nonintensive care unit healthcare workers. Staff members with experience of less than 1 year, including interns, were found to have a lower level of knowledge. These findings emphasize the importance of development and distribution an internal hospital protocol and the integration of educational intervention into a preliminary internship program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"571-575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:空气栓塞是使用中心静脉导管(CVC)时可能出现的严重并发症。虽然插入 CVC 的工作通常由训练有素的专科医生完成,但拔管工作却经常由初级员工负责。目的:我们进行了一项单中心调查,以评估非重症监护病房医护人员对预防与拔出 CVC 相关的空气栓塞的知识和实践:根据移除 CVC 的最佳实践建议确定问卷的正确答案。根据不同组别之间正确答案总和的比较,使用独立样本 t 检验确定了预测知识水平的因素:结果:在 156 名受访者中,有三分之一的人不熟悉空气栓塞是 CVC 拔出术的并发症。近 80% 的受访者不知道有 CVC 拔除协议。近一半的受访者在拔除 CVC 时没有遵循患者体位指南,72% 的受访者没有要求患者在手术过程中做瓦尔萨尔瓦动作,54% 的受访者没有要求患者在手术后保持仰卧。对操作规程的遵守情况与专业经验相关,经验少于 1 年者,尤其是实习生,对操作规程的遵守程度较低:我们的调查显示,非重症监护病房的医护人员对 CVC 移除相关空气栓塞风险的认识不足,对 CVC 移除最佳实践建议的熟悉程度也较低。包括实习生在内的工作经验不足 1 年的工作人员的知识水平也较低。这些发现强调了制定和分发医院内部规程以及将教育干预纳入初步实习计划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and Practices Regarding Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Removal-Associated Air Embolism: A Survey of Nonintensive Care Unit Medical and Nursing Staff.

Introduction: Air embolism is a potentially serious complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. While CVC insertion is usually performed by a trained specialist, extraction is frequently the responsibility of junior staff members. This complication can be easily prevented by following several simple measures described in common guidelines.

Aim: We conducted a single-center survey to assess knowledge and practices concerning the prevention of air embolism associated with CVC removal among healthcare workers from nonintensive care units.

Methods: The correct answers to the questionnaire were determined according to best-practice recommendations for CVC removal. Based on a comparison of the total sum of correct answers between the categories of groups, factors that predicted the level of knowledge were identified using an independent sample t test.

Results: Of the 156 respondents, one-third were unfamiliar with air embolism as a complication of CVC extraction. Almost 80% were unaware of the existence of a CVC removal protocol. Almost half of respondents did not follow guidelines regarding patient position when removing a CVC, 72% did not ask the patient to perform the Valsalva maneuver during the procedure, and 54% did not ask the patient to remain supine after the procedure. Adherence to the protocol was correlated with professional experience, with a lower level among those with experience of less than 1 year and, particularly, among interns.

Conclusions: Our survey revealed inappropriately low awareness of CVC removal-associated air embolism risk and low familiarity with CVC removal best-practice recommendations among nonintensive care unit healthcare workers. Staff members with experience of less than 1 year, including interns, were found to have a lower level of knowledge. These findings emphasize the importance of development and distribution an internal hospital protocol and the integration of educational intervention into a preliminary internship program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信