优化决策支持警报以缩短遥测时间:多中心评估。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1789574
Niloofar Latifi, Trent Johnson, Amy M Knight, Laura Prichett, Bahareh Modanloo, Trushar Dungarani, Sammy Zakaria, Amit Pahwa
{"title":"优化决策支持警报以缩短遥测时间:多中心评估。","authors":"Niloofar Latifi, Trent Johnson, Amy M Knight, Laura Prichett, Bahareh Modanloo, Trushar Dungarani, Sammy Zakaria, Amit Pahwa","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1789574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Telemetry monitoring is crucial for high-risk patients but excessive use beyond practice standards increases costs. Prior studies have shown that electronic health record (EHR) alerts reduce low-value telemetry monitoring. However, specific components of these alerts that contribute to effectiveness are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to revise previously implemented EHR Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) to optimize their effectiveness in reducing telemetry duration. The secondary objective was to assess the impact on clinicians' alert burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A multicenter retrospective study was conducted at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC), and Howard County General Hospital (HCGH). An EHR alert in the form of a BPA was previously implemented at JHH/JHBMC, firing at 24, 48, or 72 hours based on order indication. HCGH used an alert firing every 24 hours. A revised BPA was implemented at all hospitals optimizing the prior JHH/JHBMC alert by including patient-specific telemetry indications, restricting alerts to daytime hours (8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.), and embedding the discontinuation order within the BPA alert. A retrospective analysis from October 2018 to December 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was telemetry duration. The secondary outcome was the mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Compared with the original BPA, the revised BPA reduced telemetry duration by a mean of 6.7 hours (95% CI: 5.2-9.1 hours, <i>p</i> < 0.001) at JHH/JHBMC, with a minimal increase of 0.06 mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The BPA acceptance rate increased from 7.8 to 31.3% postintervention at JHH/JHBMC (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). At HCGH, the intervention led to a mean monthly reduction of 20.2 hours in telemetry duration per hospitalization (95% CI: 19.1-22.8 hours, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Optimizing EHR BPAs reduces unnecessary telemetry duration without substantially increasing clinician alert burden. This study highlights the importance of tailoring EHR alerts to enhance effectiveness and promote value-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"15 5","pages":"860-868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Decision Support Alerts to Reduce Telemetry Duration: A Multicenter Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Niloofar Latifi, Trent Johnson, Amy M Knight, Laura Prichett, Bahareh Modanloo, Trushar Dungarani, Sammy Zakaria, Amit Pahwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1789574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Telemetry monitoring is crucial for high-risk patients but excessive use beyond practice standards increases costs. Prior studies have shown that electronic health record (EHR) alerts reduce low-value telemetry monitoring. However, specific components of these alerts that contribute to effectiveness are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to revise previously implemented EHR Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) to optimize their effectiveness in reducing telemetry duration. The secondary objective was to assess the impact on clinicians' alert burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A multicenter retrospective study was conducted at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC), and Howard County General Hospital (HCGH). An EHR alert in the form of a BPA was previously implemented at JHH/JHBMC, firing at 24, 48, or 72 hours based on order indication. HCGH used an alert firing every 24 hours. A revised BPA was implemented at all hospitals optimizing the prior JHH/JHBMC alert by including patient-specific telemetry indications, restricting alerts to daytime hours (8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.), and embedding the discontinuation order within the BPA alert. A retrospective analysis from October 2018 to December 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was telemetry duration. The secondary outcome was the mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Compared with the original BPA, the revised BPA reduced telemetry duration by a mean of 6.7 hours (95% CI: 5.2-9.1 hours, <i>p</i> < 0.001) at JHH/JHBMC, with a minimal increase of 0.06 mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The BPA acceptance rate increased from 7.8 to 31.3% postintervention at JHH/JHBMC (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). At HCGH, the intervention led to a mean monthly reduction of 20.2 hours in telemetry duration per hospitalization (95% CI: 19.1-22.8 hours, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Optimizing EHR BPAs reduces unnecessary telemetry duration without substantially increasing clinician alert burden. This study highlights the importance of tailoring EHR alerts to enhance effectiveness and promote value-based care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"860-868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:遥测监护对高危患者至关重要,但过度使用超出实践标准的遥测监护会增加成本。先前的研究表明,电子健康记录(EHR)警报可减少低价值遥测监测。然而,这些警报中有助于提高效率的具体内容尚不清楚:我们的目标是修订之前实施的电子病历最佳实践建议(BPA),以优化其在缩短遥测时间方面的效果。次要目标是评估对临床医生警报负担的影响:在约翰霍普金斯医院(JHH)、约翰霍普金斯湾景医疗中心(JHBMC)和霍华德县综合医院(HCGH)开展了一项多中心回顾性研究。约翰霍普金斯医院/约翰霍普金斯湾景医疗中心(JHBMC)和霍华德县综合医院(HCGH)以前曾实施过 BPA 形式的电子病历警报,根据订单指示在 24、48 或 72 小时发出警报。HCGH 每 24 小时发出一次警报。所有医院都实施了修订后的 BPA,通过纳入患者特定遥测指征、将警报时间限制在白天(上午 8:00 - 下午 6:00)以及在 BPA 警报中嵌入停药指令,优化了 JHH/JHBMC 之前的警报。对 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是遥测持续时间。次要结果是平均每月每个患者日的 BPA 警报:结果:与原始 BPA 相比,修订后的 BPA 将遥测持续时间平均缩短了 6.7 个小时(95% CI:5.2-9.1 个小时,p p p p 结论:优化电子病历 BPA 可减少不必要的遥测时间,同时不会大幅增加临床医生的警报负担。这项研究强调了定制电子病历警报以提高有效性和促进基于价值的护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Decision Support Alerts to Reduce Telemetry Duration: A Multicenter Evaluation.

Background:  Telemetry monitoring is crucial for high-risk patients but excessive use beyond practice standards increases costs. Prior studies have shown that electronic health record (EHR) alerts reduce low-value telemetry monitoring. However, specific components of these alerts that contribute to effectiveness are unknown.

Objectives:  We aimed to revise previously implemented EHR Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) to optimize their effectiveness in reducing telemetry duration. The secondary objective was to assess the impact on clinicians' alert burden.

Methods:  A multicenter retrospective study was conducted at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC), and Howard County General Hospital (HCGH). An EHR alert in the form of a BPA was previously implemented at JHH/JHBMC, firing at 24, 48, or 72 hours based on order indication. HCGH used an alert firing every 24 hours. A revised BPA was implemented at all hospitals optimizing the prior JHH/JHBMC alert by including patient-specific telemetry indications, restricting alerts to daytime hours (8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.), and embedding the discontinuation order within the BPA alert. A retrospective analysis from October 2018 to December 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was telemetry duration. The secondary outcome was the mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day.

Results:  Compared with the original BPA, the revised BPA reduced telemetry duration by a mean of 6.7 hours (95% CI: 5.2-9.1 hours, p < 0.001) at JHH/JHBMC, with a minimal increase of 0.06 mean monthly BPA alerts per patient-day (p < 0.001). The BPA acceptance rate increased from 7.8 to 31.3% postintervention at JHH/JHBMC (p < 0.0001). At HCGH, the intervention led to a mean monthly reduction of 20.2 hours in telemetry duration per hospitalization (95% CI: 19.1-22.8 hours, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:  Optimizing EHR BPAs reduces unnecessary telemetry duration without substantially increasing clinician alert burden. This study highlights the importance of tailoring EHR alerts to enhance effectiveness and promote value-based care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信