The influence of malaria control interventions and climate variability on changes in the geographical distribution of parasite prevalence in Kenya between 2015 and 2020.

Background: The burden of malaria in Kenya was showing a declining trend, but appears to have reached a plateau in recent years. This study estimated changes in the geographical distribution of malaria parasite risk in the country between the years 2015 and 2020, and quantified the contribution of malaria control interventions and climatic/ environmental factors to these changes.

Methods: Bayesian geostatistical models were used to analyse the Kenyan 2015 and 2020 Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) data. Bivariate models were fitted to identify the most important control intervention indicators and climatic/environmental predictors of parasitaemia risk by age groups (6-59 months and 5-14 years). Parasitaemia risk and the number of infected children were predicted over a 1 × 1 km² grid. The probability of the decline in parasitaemia risk in 2020 compared to 2015 was also evaluated over the gridded surface and factors associated with changes in parasitaemia risk between the two surveys were evaluated.

Results: There was a significant decline in the coverage of most malaria indicators related to Insecticide Treated Nets (ITN) and Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACT) interventions. Overall, there was a 31% and 26% reduction in malaria prevalence among children aged < 5 and 5-14 years, respectively. Among younger children, the highest reduction (50%) and increase (41%) were in the low-risk and semi-arid epi zones, respectively; while among older children there was increased risk in both the low-risk (83%) and semi-arid (100%) epi zones. Increase in nightlights and the proportion of individuals using ITNs in 2020 were associated with reduced parasitaemia risk.

Conclusion: Increased nightlights and ITN use could have led to the reduction in parasitaemia risk. However, the reduction is heterogeneous and there was increased risk in northern Kenya. Taken together, these results suggest that constant surveillance and re-evaluation of parasite and vector control measures in areas with increased transmission is necessary. The methods used in this analysis can be employed in other settings.