{"title":"利用入学测试法估算本科医学教育临床前阶段学生的学业成功率。","authors":"Wienta Diarsvitri, Efyluk Garianto, Roostantia Indrawati, Wiwik Sulistiani","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2024.101936.1949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical schools face substantial challenges in objectively selecting the best applicants, and the admission process can impact medical students' academic performance. This study aimed to estimate the students' academic success in the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education using admission tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,193 students' records from the 2014 to 2019 cohorts. The students' admission data comprised the cohort, sex, admission track, psychological test, and academic tests. The academic success was based on the student's end-year academic evaluation. Data were analyzed using contingency and Kendall's tau b tests with IBM<sup>®</sup> SPSS<sup>®</sup> Statistics version 16.0 for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 1,193 preclinical medical students' records included in the study were females (68.1%), from the regular admission track (78.5%), from the considered psychology test category (52.8%), and had an academic admission test of less than or equal to the median. (51.6%). Most students (89.7%) met all the academic requirements to pass the end-year evaluation. The bivariate analyses showed significant correlations between academic success and cohort (p<0.001), psychology test (p=0.005), and academic test (p<0.001). The analyses showed no significant correlation between academic success and sex (p=0.324), and admission track (p=0.128).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicated that cohort and psychology tests could estimate the student's academic success at the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education. The admission criteria related to the academic tests during the admission process should be re-evaluated, so that the academic tests could select the best students among the applicants.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"12 4","pages":"235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Students' Academic Success in the Preclinical Stage of Undergraduate Medical Education Using the Admission Test Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Wienta Diarsvitri, Efyluk Garianto, Roostantia Indrawati, Wiwik Sulistiani\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/jamp.2024.101936.1949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical schools face substantial challenges in objectively selecting the best applicants, and the admission process can impact medical students' academic performance. This study aimed to estimate the students' academic success in the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education using admission tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,193 students' records from the 2014 to 2019 cohorts. The students' admission data comprised the cohort, sex, admission track, psychological test, and academic tests. The academic success was based on the student's end-year academic evaluation. Data were analyzed using contingency and Kendall's tau b tests with IBM<sup>®</sup> SPSS<sup>®</sup> Statistics version 16.0 for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 1,193 preclinical medical students' records included in the study were females (68.1%), from the regular admission track (78.5%), from the considered psychology test category (52.8%), and had an academic admission test of less than or equal to the median. (51.6%). Most students (89.7%) met all the academic requirements to pass the end-year evaluation. The bivariate analyses showed significant correlations between academic success and cohort (p<0.001), psychology test (p=0.005), and academic test (p<0.001). The analyses showed no significant correlation between academic success and sex (p=0.324), and admission track (p=0.128).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicated that cohort and psychology tests could estimate the student's academic success at the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education. The admission criteria related to the academic tests during the admission process should be re-evaluated, so that the academic tests could select the best students among the applicants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"235-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2024.101936.1949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2024.101936.1949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:医学院在客观选拔最优秀的申请者方面面临巨大挑战,而录取过程会影响医学生的学业成绩。本研究旨在通过入学测试估测学生在本科医学教育临床前阶段的学业成绩:这项横断面研究针对2014至2019届的1193名学生记录进行。学生的入学数据包括队列、性别、入学途径、心理测试和学业测试。学业成绩基于学生的年终学业评价。数据采用IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 16.0 for Windows进行或然率和Kendall's tau b检验分析:在 1,193 名临床前医科学生的研究记录中,大部分为女性(68.1%),来自常规录取轨道(78.5%),来自被认为是心理测试类别(52.8%),学术录取测试小于或等于中位数。(51.6%).大多数学生(89.7%)达到了通过年终评估的所有学业要求。双变量分析表明,学业成功与队列之间存在显著相关性(p 结论:这项研究表明,队列和心理测试可以估计学生在本科医学教育临床前阶段的学业成功率。应重新评估入学过程中与学业测试相关的录取标准,以便学业测试能从申请者中选拔出最优秀的学生。
Estimating Students' Academic Success in the Preclinical Stage of Undergraduate Medical Education Using the Admission Test Approach.
Introduction: Medical schools face substantial challenges in objectively selecting the best applicants, and the admission process can impact medical students' academic performance. This study aimed to estimate the students' academic success in the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education using admission tests.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,193 students' records from the 2014 to 2019 cohorts. The students' admission data comprised the cohort, sex, admission track, psychological test, and academic tests. The academic success was based on the student's end-year academic evaluation. Data were analyzed using contingency and Kendall's tau b tests with IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 16.0 for Windows.
Results: Most of the 1,193 preclinical medical students' records included in the study were females (68.1%), from the regular admission track (78.5%), from the considered psychology test category (52.8%), and had an academic admission test of less than or equal to the median. (51.6%). Most students (89.7%) met all the academic requirements to pass the end-year evaluation. The bivariate analyses showed significant correlations between academic success and cohort (p<0.001), psychology test (p=0.005), and academic test (p<0.001). The analyses showed no significant correlation between academic success and sex (p=0.324), and admission track (p=0.128).
Conclusions: This study indicated that cohort and psychology tests could estimate the student's academic success at the preclinical stage of undergraduate medical education. The admission criteria related to the academic tests during the admission process should be re-evaluated, so that the academic tests could select the best students among the applicants.