Anna Pous, Adrià Bernat-Peguera, Assumpció López-Paradís, Beatriz Cirauqui, Vanesa Quiroga, Iris Teruel, Eudald Felip, Angelica Ferrando-Díez, Milana Bergamino, Laia Boronat, Margarita Romeo, Gemma Soler, Christian Mariño, Paula Rodríguez-Martínez, Laura Pons, Ester Ballana, Anna Martinez-Cardús, Mireia Margelí
{"title":"解密低 HER2 乳腺癌 (BC):从早期乳腺癌真实世界数据中获得的启示。","authors":"Anna Pous, Adrià Bernat-Peguera, Assumpció López-Paradís, Beatriz Cirauqui, Vanesa Quiroga, Iris Teruel, Eudald Felip, Angelica Ferrando-Díez, Milana Bergamino, Laia Boronat, Margarita Romeo, Gemma Soler, Christian Mariño, Paula Rodríguez-Martínez, Laura Pons, Ester Ballana, Anna Martinez-Cardús, Mireia Margelí","doi":"10.1177/17588359241290720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, <i>p</i> = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; <i>p</i> = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241290720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Pous, Adrià Bernat-Peguera, Assumpció López-Paradís, Beatriz Cirauqui, Vanesa Quiroga, Iris Teruel, Eudald Felip, Angelica Ferrando-Díez, Milana Bergamino, Laia Boronat, Margarita Romeo, Gemma Soler, Christian Mariño, Paula Rodríguez-Martínez, Laura Pons, Ester Ballana, Anna Martinez-Cardús, Mireia Margelí\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241290720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, <i>p</i> = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; <i>p</i> = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17588359241290720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241290720\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241290720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:低人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)已成为乳腺癌(BC)的一个潜在新实体。有关这一亚群的数据有限,预后结果也存在争议,这表明需要在乳腺癌真实世界队列中获得更多数据:方法:对加泰罗尼亚巴达洛纳肿瘤研究所(Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona)的单一队列中2006年至2016年间确诊的HER2阴性I-III期BC患者进行回顾性研究。通过病历/电子病历研究了人口统计学和临床病理学特征。我们旨在通过Chi-square或Fisher检验对HER2-0/HER2-low人群进行描述和比较,并通过Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归模型探讨其对预后的影响:在 1755 例 BC 患者中,评估了 1401 例侵袭性 HER2 阴性、I-III 期病例。87%为激素受体(HR)阳性,13%为三阴性(TNBC)。总体而言,43%为HER2-0,57%为HER2-低(61%为免疫组化(IHC)1+,39%为免疫组化(IHC)2+)。HER2 低与 HER2-0 相比,HER2-低的病例中雌激素受体 (ER) 阳性(91.6% 对 79.9%,P ⩽0.001)和孕激素受体 (PR) 阳性(79.8% 对 68.9%,P ⩽0.001)的比例更高。HER2-0表现出更高的TNBC比例(20.1% vs 8.4%,p = 0.001)、III级肿瘤(28.8% vs 23.5%,p = 0.039)和更高的Ki67中位值(26.47% vs 23.88%,p = 0.041)。与HER2-0相比,HER2-低与更长的远处复发时间(TTDR)(67.8个月 vs 54.1个月;p = 0.015)和更好的BC相关生存期(19.2年 vs 16.3年;p = 0.033)相关。在多变量分析中,HER2-低并不是TTDR和BC相关生存期的独立预后因素。ER表达与更长的TTDR(危险比:0.425,p ⩽0.001)和更高的BC相关生存率(危险比:0.380,p ⩽0.001)密切相关。PR 表达也与较长的 TTDR 相关(危险比:0.496,p ⩽0.001),并能改善 BC 相关生存率(危险比:0.488,p ⩽0.001)。组织学 III 级与较短的 TTDR 显著相关(危险比:1.737,p = 0.002)。结节状态阳性是与较差的 BC 相关生存率相关的最强因素(危险比:2.747,p ⩽0.001):结论:HER2-低与HR阳性疾病明显相关,而HER2-0组的TNBC发病率更高,组织学分级为III级,Ki67%更高。虽然HER2-低组与更长的TTDR和更高的BC相关生存率有关,但与HER2-0组相比,该亚组中有利预后特征的比例更高,这可能是这些发现的原因。
Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer.
Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort.
Methods: Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.
Results: From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, p = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; p = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; p = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, p ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, p ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, p ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, p ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, p = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, p ⩽ 0.001).
Conclusion: HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).