双样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化中的修正去偏反方差加权估计器

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1002/sim.10245
Youpeng Su, Siqi Xu, Yilei Ma, Ping Yin, Xingjie Hao, Jiyuan Zhou, Wing Kam Fung, Hongwei Jiang, Peng Wang
{"title":"双样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化中的修正去偏反方差加权估计器","authors":"Youpeng Su, Siqi Xu, Yilei Ma, Ping Yin, Xingjie Hao, Jiyuan Zhou, Wing Kam Fung, Hongwei Jiang, Peng Wang","doi":"10.1002/sim.10245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of exposure on outcome from observational data. A common challenge in Mendelian randomization is that many genetic variants are only modestly or even weakly associated with the exposure of interest, a setting known as many weak instruments. Conventional methods, such as the popular inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator, could be heavily biased toward zero when the instrument strength is weak. To address this issue, the debiased IVW (dIVW) estimator and the penalized IVW (pIVW) estimator, which are shown to be robust to many weak instruments, were recently proposed. However, we find that the dIVW estimator tends to produce an exaggerated estimate of the causal effect, especially when the effective sample size is small. Although the pIVW estimator has better statistical properties, it is slightly more complex, and the idea behind this method is also a bit less intuitive. Therefore, we propose a modified debiased IVW (mdIVW) estimator that directly multiplies a shrinkage factor with the original dIVW estimator. After this simple modification, we prove that the mdIVW estimator not only has second-order bias with respect to the effective sample size, but also has smaller variance and mean squared error than the preceding two estimators. We then extend the proposed method to account for the presence of instrumental variable selection and balanced horizontal pleiotropy. We demonstrate the improvement of the mdIVW estimator over the competing ones through extensive simulation studies and real data analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5484-5496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modified Debiased Inverse-Variance Weighted Estimator in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization.\",\"authors\":\"Youpeng Su, Siqi Xu, Yilei Ma, Ping Yin, Xingjie Hao, Jiyuan Zhou, Wing Kam Fung, Hongwei Jiang, Peng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.10245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of exposure on outcome from observational data. A common challenge in Mendelian randomization is that many genetic variants are only modestly or even weakly associated with the exposure of interest, a setting known as many weak instruments. Conventional methods, such as the popular inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator, could be heavily biased toward zero when the instrument strength is weak. To address this issue, the debiased IVW (dIVW) estimator and the penalized IVW (pIVW) estimator, which are shown to be robust to many weak instruments, were recently proposed. However, we find that the dIVW estimator tends to produce an exaggerated estimate of the causal effect, especially when the effective sample size is small. Although the pIVW estimator has better statistical properties, it is slightly more complex, and the idea behind this method is also a bit less intuitive. Therefore, we propose a modified debiased IVW (mdIVW) estimator that directly multiplies a shrinkage factor with the original dIVW estimator. After this simple modification, we prove that the mdIVW estimator not only has second-order bias with respect to the effective sample size, but also has smaller variance and mean squared error than the preceding two estimators. We then extend the proposed method to account for the presence of instrumental variable selection and balanced horizontal pleiotropy. We demonstrate the improvement of the mdIVW estimator over the competing ones through extensive simulation studies and real data analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5484-5496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟德尔随机化利用基因变异作为工具变量,从观察数据中估计暴露对结果的因果效应。孟德尔随机分析法面临的一个共同挑战是,许多遗传变异与相关暴露的关联度不高,甚至很弱,这种情况被称为多弱工具。当工具强度较弱时,传统方法(如流行的逆方差加权(IVW)估计器)可能会严重偏向零。为了解决这个问题,最近提出了去偏 IVW(dIVW)估计器和惩罚 IVW(pIVW)估计器,这两种估计器被证明对许多弱工具具有稳健性。然而,我们发现 dIVW 估计器往往会产生夸大的因果效应估计值,尤其是在有效样本量较小时。虽然 pIVW 估计器具有更好的统计特性,但它略显复杂,而且这种方法背后的理念也不够直观。因此,我们提出了一种改进的去偏差 IVW(mdIVW)估计器,它直接将收缩因子与原始的 dIVW 估计器相乘。经过这一简单修改后,我们证明 mdIVW 估计器不仅具有与有效样本量相关的二阶偏差,而且方差和均方误差也小于前两种估计器。然后,我们对所提出的方法进行了扩展,以考虑工具变量选择和平衡水平多向性的存在。通过大量的模拟研究和实际数据分析,我们证明了 mdIVW 估计器相对于其他竞争估计器的改进之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Modified Debiased Inverse-Variance Weighted Estimator in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization.

Mendelian randomization uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of exposure on outcome from observational data. A common challenge in Mendelian randomization is that many genetic variants are only modestly or even weakly associated with the exposure of interest, a setting known as many weak instruments. Conventional methods, such as the popular inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator, could be heavily biased toward zero when the instrument strength is weak. To address this issue, the debiased IVW (dIVW) estimator and the penalized IVW (pIVW) estimator, which are shown to be robust to many weak instruments, were recently proposed. However, we find that the dIVW estimator tends to produce an exaggerated estimate of the causal effect, especially when the effective sample size is small. Although the pIVW estimator has better statistical properties, it is slightly more complex, and the idea behind this method is also a bit less intuitive. Therefore, we propose a modified debiased IVW (mdIVW) estimator that directly multiplies a shrinkage factor with the original dIVW estimator. After this simple modification, we prove that the mdIVW estimator not only has second-order bias with respect to the effective sample size, but also has smaller variance and mean squared error than the preceding two estimators. We then extend the proposed method to account for the presence of instrumental variable selection and balanced horizontal pleiotropy. We demonstrate the improvement of the mdIVW estimator over the competing ones through extensive simulation studies and real data analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信