近期冲突中严重战伤后的多器官衰竭:一项法国回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002497
Schmitt Johan, Cloé Jacques Sébastien, Nicolas Herzog, Mathieu Boutonnet, Christophe Giacardi, Marc Danguy des Déserts, Thibault Martinez
{"title":"近期冲突中严重战伤后的多器官衰竭:一项法国回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Schmitt Johan, Cloé Jacques Sébastien, Nicolas Herzog, Mathieu Boutonnet, Christophe Giacardi, Marc Danguy des Déserts, Thibault Martinez","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Improvements in combat casualty care have increased survival rates, but these patients are at particular risk of developing multiple organ failure (MOF). We investigated the incidence and severity of MOF in a cohort of severe combat casualties.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all on-duty French land army war casualties with a severe combat injury requiring intensive care unit admission during 2009-2023. Demographic data, advanced life support interventions, and outcomes were collected. Each organ failure was then analyzed during a 7-day trauma course according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, those with persistent MOF at day 4 (MOF group) represented 22% of the total population (median SOFA score 6.0 [5.3-8.0]). Compared to those without persistent MOF, these patients were more severely injured (median Military Injury Severity Score 38.0 [interquartile range 33.0-56.8] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.0], p < 0.001) by an explosive mechanism (68.2%) and sustained more traumatic brain injury (TBI; 40.9% vs 14.1%, p = 0.013). The MOF group also received significantly more blood units (median 14.0 [8.3-24.8] vs 6.0 [0.0-12.0], p < 0.001) and massive transfusions (68.2% vs 32.1%, p = 0.002). Pulmonary and cardiovascular dysfunction were the most frequently observed trauma outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that MOF persistence at day 4 was significantly associated (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]) with severe injuries (1.5 [1-2.3], p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high number of severe lesions significantly and independently increased risk of MOF persistence at day 4 after combat-related trauma. These findings are particularly relevant to current and anticipated large-scale combat operations that will challenge battlefield casualty care and evacuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple organ failure following severe battle injuries during recent conflicts: a French retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Schmitt Johan, Cloé Jacques Sébastien, Nicolas Herzog, Mathieu Boutonnet, Christophe Giacardi, Marc Danguy des Déserts, Thibault Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Improvements in combat casualty care have increased survival rates, but these patients are at particular risk of developing multiple organ failure (MOF). We investigated the incidence and severity of MOF in a cohort of severe combat casualties.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all on-duty French land army war casualties with a severe combat injury requiring intensive care unit admission during 2009-2023. Demographic data, advanced life support interventions, and outcomes were collected. Each organ failure was then analyzed during a 7-day trauma course according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, those with persistent MOF at day 4 (MOF group) represented 22% of the total population (median SOFA score 6.0 [5.3-8.0]). Compared to those without persistent MOF, these patients were more severely injured (median Military Injury Severity Score 38.0 [interquartile range 33.0-56.8] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.0], p < 0.001) by an explosive mechanism (68.2%) and sustained more traumatic brain injury (TBI; 40.9% vs 14.1%, p = 0.013). The MOF group also received significantly more blood units (median 14.0 [8.3-24.8] vs 6.0 [0.0-12.0], p < 0.001) and massive transfusions (68.2% vs 32.1%, p = 0.002). Pulmonary and cardiovascular dysfunction were the most frequently observed trauma outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that MOF persistence at day 4 was significantly associated (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]) with severe injuries (1.5 [1-2.3], p = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high number of severe lesions significantly and independently increased risk of MOF persistence at day 4 after combat-related trauma. These findings are particularly relevant to current and anticipated large-scale combat operations that will challenge battlefield casualty care and evacuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002497\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:战斗伤员护理的改进提高了存活率,但这些患者特别容易出现多器官功能衰竭(MOF)。我们调查了一批严重作战伤员的多器官功能衰竭发生率和严重程度:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2009-2023 年期间法国陆军所有因严重战伤而需要入住重症监护室的伤员。研究收集了人口统计学数据、高级生命支持干预措施和结果。然后,根据器官功能衰竭顺序评估(SOFA)评分,对7天创伤过程中的每种器官功能衰竭进行分析:在符合纳入标准的 100 名患者中,第 4 天出现持续 MOF 的患者(MOF 组)占总人数的 22%(SOFA 评分中位数为 6.0 [5.3-8.0])。与没有持续 MOF 的患者相比,这些患者因爆炸机制(68.2%)而受伤(中位数军事伤害严重程度评分 38.0 [四分位间范围 33.0-56.8] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.0],p < 0.001),并且遭受了更多的创伤性脑损伤(TBI;40.9% vs 14.1%,p = 0.013)。MOF 组接受的血液单位(中位数 14.0 [8.3-24.8] vs 6.0 [0.0-12.0],p < 0.001)和大量输血(68.2% vs 32.1%,p = 0.002)也明显较多。肺功能障碍和心血管功能障碍是最常见的创伤结果。多变量逻辑回归模型显示,第4天MOF持续存在与严重损伤显著相关(几率比[95%置信区间])(1.5 [1-2.3],p = 0.042):结论:大量严重损伤会显著增加战斗相关创伤后第 4 天 MOF 持续存在的风险。这些发现与当前和预期的大规模作战行动尤其相关,因为这些行动将对战场伤员护理和后送提出挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple organ failure following severe battle injuries during recent conflicts: a French retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Improvements in combat casualty care have increased survival rates, but these patients are at particular risk of developing multiple organ failure (MOF). We investigated the incidence and severity of MOF in a cohort of severe combat casualties.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included all on-duty French land army war casualties with a severe combat injury requiring intensive care unit admission during 2009-2023. Demographic data, advanced life support interventions, and outcomes were collected. Each organ failure was then analyzed during a 7-day trauma course according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

Results: Of the 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, those with persistent MOF at day 4 (MOF group) represented 22% of the total population (median SOFA score 6.0 [5.3-8.0]). Compared to those without persistent MOF, these patients were more severely injured (median Military Injury Severity Score 38.0 [interquartile range 33.0-56.8] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.0], p < 0.001) by an explosive mechanism (68.2%) and sustained more traumatic brain injury (TBI; 40.9% vs 14.1%, p = 0.013). The MOF group also received significantly more blood units (median 14.0 [8.3-24.8] vs 6.0 [0.0-12.0], p < 0.001) and massive transfusions (68.2% vs 32.1%, p = 0.002). Pulmonary and cardiovascular dysfunction were the most frequently observed trauma outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that MOF persistence at day 4 was significantly associated (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]) with severe injuries (1.5 [1-2.3], p = 0.042).

Conclusion: A high number of severe lesions significantly and independently increased risk of MOF persistence at day 4 after combat-related trauma. These findings are particularly relevant to current and anticipated large-scale combat operations that will challenge battlefield casualty care and evacuation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信