COVID-19重症监护室幸存者的长期残疾。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe
{"title":"COVID-19重症监护室幸存者的长期残疾。","authors":"Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects (<i>N</i> = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (<i>n</i> = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3-6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (<i>P</i> < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (<i>P</i> = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1508-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Disabilities in ICU Survivors of COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.12032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjects (<i>N</i> = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (<i>n</i> = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3-6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (<i>P</i> < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (<i>P</i> = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1508-1516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 与长期残疾有关,尤其是在危重病后。本研究旨在评估和比较因 COVID-19 而入住重症监护室、接受有创通气治疗和未接受有创通气治疗的受试者出院后的残疾情况。本研究还探讨了与长期残疾相关的变量:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,对在入住 ICU 期间接受有创通气、无创通气或高流量鼻插管的 COVID-19 患者,在出院后 3 个月和 6 个月时使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表 (WHODAS) 2.0 进行评估。对数据进行了汇总分析,并按有创机械通气和无创机械通气受试者进行了分层。采用方差分析和多元回归分析:受试者(N = 43)主要为男性、中年和超重。在医院评估期间,与未进行有创机械通气的受试者相比,进行有创机械通气的受试者(21 人)的身体功能有所下降。出院后3-6个月,两组患者的WHODAS所有领域和总分均有所下降(P < .001),表明残疾状况有所恢复。与不通气组相比,通气组患者在评估社会参与度的唯一一项指标上仍然较差(P = .01)。时间与研究组之间没有交互作用,这表明康复轨迹是相似的。在 6 个月时,考虑到整个队列,分别有 70% 和 56% 的患者在自理和相处领域没有残疾,而 42% 的患者在参与领域表现出中度到重度残疾。根据WHODAS的总体评分,86%的受试者在6个月时仍有一定程度的残疾。在多变量分析中,WHODAS总分以及家庭和参与领域与皮质类固醇的使用呈显著正相关,表明残疾程度较高:无论是否需要进行有创机械通气,COVID-19重症监护室幸存者在出院后6个月仍存在残疾。在接受有创通气的患者中,参与是唯一显示出较高残疾程度的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Disabilities in ICU Survivors of COVID-19.

Background: COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.

Results: The subjects (N = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (n = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3-6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (P < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (P = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.

Conclusions: Disability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信