对部分 COX-2 和 5-LOX 双抑制剂药代动力学特性的体外评估

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.3390/ph17101329
Jelena Bošković, Vladimir Dobričić, Jelena Savić, Jelena Rupar, Mara Aleksić, Bojan Marković, Olivera Čudina
{"title":"对部分 COX-2 和 5-LOX 双抑制剂药代动力学特性的体外评估","authors":"Jelena Bošković, Vladimir Dobričić, Jelena Savić, Jelena Rupar, Mara Aleksić, Bojan Marković, Olivera Čudina","doi":"10.3390/ph17101329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties is a significant step at the early stages of drug development. In this study, an in vitro evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of five newly synthesized compounds was performed. These compounds belong to N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid derivatives and analogs of NSAIDs indomethacin, flurbiprofen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen (compounds <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>3</b>, <b>11,</b> and <b>12</b>, respectively) with dual COX-2 and 5-LOX inhibitory activity. Two in vitro methods (biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) and PAMPA) were used to evaluate passive gastrointestinal absorption, while high-performance affinity chromatography (HPAC) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were used to evaluate binding to human serum albumin (HSA). The introduction of N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid groups into the structure of NSAIDs decreases both expected passive gastrointestinal absorption (BMC <b>k</b> values were from 3.02 to 9.50, while for NSAIDs were from 5.29 to 13.36; PAMPA <b>-logPe</b> values were between 3.81 and 4.76, while for NSAIDs were ≤3.46) and HSA binding (HPAC <b>logk</b> values were from 2.03 to 9.54, while for NSAIDs were ≥11.03; DPV peak potential shifts were between 7 and 34, while for NSAIDs were ≥54). Structural modifications of all tested compounds that increase lipophilicity could be considered to enhance their passive gastrointestinal absorption. Considering lower expected HSA binding and higher lipophilicity of tested compounds compared to corresponding NSAIDs, it can be expected that the volume of distribution of compounds <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>3</b>, <b>11,</b> and <b>12</b> will be higher. Reduced HSA binding may also decrease interactions with other drugs in comparison to corresponding NSAIDs. All tested compounds showed significant microsomal instability (25.07-58.44% decrease in concentration) in comparison to indomethacin (14.47%) and diclofenac (20.99%).</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Properties of Selected Dual COX-2 and 5-LOX Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Bošković, Vladimir Dobričić, Jelena Savić, Jelena Rupar, Mara Aleksić, Bojan Marković, Olivera Čudina\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph17101329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties is a significant step at the early stages of drug development. In this study, an in vitro evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of five newly synthesized compounds was performed. These compounds belong to N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid derivatives and analogs of NSAIDs indomethacin, flurbiprofen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen (compounds <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>3</b>, <b>11,</b> and <b>12</b>, respectively) with dual COX-2 and 5-LOX inhibitory activity. Two in vitro methods (biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) and PAMPA) were used to evaluate passive gastrointestinal absorption, while high-performance affinity chromatography (HPAC) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were used to evaluate binding to human serum albumin (HSA). The introduction of N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid groups into the structure of NSAIDs decreases both expected passive gastrointestinal absorption (BMC <b>k</b> values were from 3.02 to 9.50, while for NSAIDs were from 5.29 to 13.36; PAMPA <b>-logPe</b> values were between 3.81 and 4.76, while for NSAIDs were ≤3.46) and HSA binding (HPAC <b>logk</b> values were from 2.03 to 9.54, while for NSAIDs were ≥11.03; DPV peak potential shifts were between 7 and 34, while for NSAIDs were ≥54). Structural modifications of all tested compounds that increase lipophilicity could be considered to enhance their passive gastrointestinal absorption. Considering lower expected HSA binding and higher lipophilicity of tested compounds compared to corresponding NSAIDs, it can be expected that the volume of distribution of compounds <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, <b>3</b>, <b>11,</b> and <b>12</b> will be higher. Reduced HSA binding may also decrease interactions with other drugs in comparison to corresponding NSAIDs. All tested compounds showed significant microsomal instability (25.07-58.44% decrease in concentration) in comparison to indomethacin (14.47%) and diclofenac (20.99%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药代动力学特性评估是药物开发早期的一个重要步骤。本研究对五个新合成化合物的药代动力学特性进行了体外评价。这些化合物属于 N-羟基脲和羟肟酸衍生物以及非甾体抗炎药吲哚美辛、氟比洛芬、双氯芬酸、布洛芬和萘普生的类似物(分别为化合物 1、2、3、11 和 12),具有 COX-2 和 5-LOX 双重抑制活性。两种体外方法(生物分离胶束色谱法 (BMC) 和 PAMPA)用于评估被动胃肠道吸收,而高效亲和层析法 (HPAC) 和差分脉冲伏安法 (DPV) 用于评估与人血清白蛋白 (HSA) 的结合。在非甾体抗炎药的结构中引入 N- 羟基脲和羟肟酸基团会降低预期的被动胃肠道吸收率(BMC k 值从 3.02 到 9.50,而非甾体抗炎药的 K 值从 5.29 到 13.36;PAMPA -logP 值从 3.02 到 9.50,而非甾体抗炎药的 K 值从 5.29 到 9.50)。36;PAMPA -logPe 值介于 3.81 和 4.76 之间,而非甾体抗炎药的 PAMPA -logPe 值≤3.46)和 HSA 结合(HPAC logk 值介于 2.03 和 9.54 之间,而非甾体抗炎药的 HPAC logk 值≥11.03;DPV 峰电位移动介于 7 和 34 之间,而非甾体抗炎药的 DPV 峰电位移动≥54)。对所有测试化合物进行结构改造以增加亲油性,可被认为是为了促进其被动胃肠道吸收。考虑到与相应的非甾体抗炎药相比,测试化合物的 HSA 结合力较低,亲脂性较高,因此可以预计化合物 1、2、3、11 和 12 的分布容积会更大。与相应的非甾体抗炎药相比,HSA 结合力降低也会减少与其他药物的相互作用。与吲哚美辛(14.47%)和双氯芬酸(20.99%)相比,所有测试化合物都表现出明显的微粒体不稳定性(浓度下降 25.07-58.44%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Properties of Selected Dual COX-2 and 5-LOX Inhibitors.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties is a significant step at the early stages of drug development. In this study, an in vitro evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of five newly synthesized compounds was performed. These compounds belong to N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid derivatives and analogs of NSAIDs indomethacin, flurbiprofen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen (compounds 1, 2, 3, 11, and 12, respectively) with dual COX-2 and 5-LOX inhibitory activity. Two in vitro methods (biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) and PAMPA) were used to evaluate passive gastrointestinal absorption, while high-performance affinity chromatography (HPAC) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were used to evaluate binding to human serum albumin (HSA). The introduction of N-hydroxyurea and hydroxamic acid groups into the structure of NSAIDs decreases both expected passive gastrointestinal absorption (BMC k values were from 3.02 to 9.50, while for NSAIDs were from 5.29 to 13.36; PAMPA -logPe values were between 3.81 and 4.76, while for NSAIDs were ≤3.46) and HSA binding (HPAC logk values were from 2.03 to 9.54, while for NSAIDs were ≥11.03; DPV peak potential shifts were between 7 and 34, while for NSAIDs were ≥54). Structural modifications of all tested compounds that increase lipophilicity could be considered to enhance their passive gastrointestinal absorption. Considering lower expected HSA binding and higher lipophilicity of tested compounds compared to corresponding NSAIDs, it can be expected that the volume of distribution of compounds 1, 2, 3, 11, and 12 will be higher. Reduced HSA binding may also decrease interactions with other drugs in comparison to corresponding NSAIDs. All tested compounds showed significant microsomal instability (25.07-58.44% decrease in concentration) in comparison to indomethacin (14.47%) and diclofenac (20.99%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信