移除老化脊髓刺激器的挑战:9 年 S 系列桨式导联完全断裂的病例研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1111/papr.13429
Dong-Chun Kim, Eunsu Kang, Hyun-Seong Lee, Yei Heum Park, Byeongcheol Lee, Ji Yeon Kwon, Junseong Moon, Sang Eun Lee
{"title":"移除老化脊髓刺激器的挑战:9 年 S 系列桨式导联完全断裂的病例研究。","authors":"Dong-Chun Kim, Eunsu Kang, Hyun-Seong Lee, Yei Heum Park, Byeongcheol Lee, Ji Yeon Kwon, Junseong Moon, Sang Eun Lee","doi":"10.1111/papr.13429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This case report presents an instance of an S-Series™ slim paddle lead fracturing during extraction, highlighting potential risks associated with the removal of this lead.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 47-year-old male with complex regional pain syndrome type 2, unresponsive to pharmacotherapy, had undergone the implantation of two spinal cord stimulator (SCS) leads, an Octrode™ cylindrical and an S-series™ slim paddle, using the Epiducer™ system (St Jude Medical) 9 years earlier, with a subsequent intrathecal baclofen pump installed 1 year after SCS. Initially, these interventions stabilized the patient's pain symptoms. However, the diminishing effectiveness of SCS, coupled with a decrease in battery life and increased opioid consumption, necessitated recent surgical procedures. These included the removal and replacement of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) and leads to improve pain management and ensure MRI compatibility. During the removal of the S-series™ slim paddle type lead, complications arose, leading to the retention of an electrode fragment, which necessitated abandoning the replacement of both the IPG and lead. Post-surgical assessments revealed no new neurological impairments, and imaging studies confirmed the stable position of the retained fragment. The patient was discharged with a continued comprehensive pain management plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the challenges and risks of percutaneous removal of slim paddle type leads, emphasizing the need for careful procedural planning and consideration of surgical options to avoid complications. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term durability and removal risks of various SCS lead types.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in removing an aged spinal cord stimulator: A case study of complete fracture in a 9-year-old S-series paddle lead.\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Chun Kim, Eunsu Kang, Hyun-Seong Lee, Yei Heum Park, Byeongcheol Lee, Ji Yeon Kwon, Junseong Moon, Sang Eun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papr.13429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This case report presents an instance of an S-Series™ slim paddle lead fracturing during extraction, highlighting potential risks associated with the removal of this lead.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 47-year-old male with complex regional pain syndrome type 2, unresponsive to pharmacotherapy, had undergone the implantation of two spinal cord stimulator (SCS) leads, an Octrode™ cylindrical and an S-series™ slim paddle, using the Epiducer™ system (St Jude Medical) 9 years earlier, with a subsequent intrathecal baclofen pump installed 1 year after SCS. Initially, these interventions stabilized the patient's pain symptoms. However, the diminishing effectiveness of SCS, coupled with a decrease in battery life and increased opioid consumption, necessitated recent surgical procedures. These included the removal and replacement of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) and leads to improve pain management and ensure MRI compatibility. During the removal of the S-series™ slim paddle type lead, complications arose, leading to the retention of an electrode fragment, which necessitated abandoning the replacement of both the IPG and lead. Post-surgical assessments revealed no new neurological impairments, and imaging studies confirmed the stable position of the retained fragment. The patient was discharged with a continued comprehensive pain management plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the challenges and risks of percutaneous removal of slim paddle type leads, emphasizing the need for careful procedural planning and consideration of surgical options to avoid complications. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term durability and removal risks of various SCS lead types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本病例报告介绍了一个 S-Series™ 超薄桨状导联线在拔出过程中断裂的实例,强调了拔出这种导联线的潜在风险:一名 47 岁的男性患者患有 2 型复杂性区域疼痛综合征,对药物治疗无反应,9 年前曾使用 Epiducer™ 系统(圣裘德医疗公司)植入了两个脊髓刺激器(SCS)导联,一个是 Octrode™ 圆柱形导联,另一个是 S-series™ 超薄桨形导联。最初,这些干预措施稳定了患者的疼痛症状。然而,由于 SCS 的效果越来越差,加上电池寿命缩短和阿片类药物用量增加,最近不得不进行手术治疗。这些手术包括移除和更换植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)和导线,以改善疼痛管理并确保核磁共振成像的兼容性。在移除 S-series™ 超薄桨式导联时,出现了并发症,导致电极碎片滞留,因此不得不放弃更换 IPG 和导联。手术后的评估结果显示,患者没有出现新的神经损伤,影像学检查也证实了残留电极片的位置稳定。患者出院时继续接受了全面的疼痛治疗计划:本病例凸显了经皮切除纤细桨状导联的挑战和风险,强调了仔细制定手术计划和考虑手术方案以避免并发症的必要性。需要进一步研究评估各种 SCS 导联类型的长期耐久性和移除风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in removing an aged spinal cord stimulator: A case study of complete fracture in a 9-year-old S-series paddle lead.

Introduction: This case report presents an instance of an S-Series™ slim paddle lead fracturing during extraction, highlighting potential risks associated with the removal of this lead.

Case report: A 47-year-old male with complex regional pain syndrome type 2, unresponsive to pharmacotherapy, had undergone the implantation of two spinal cord stimulator (SCS) leads, an Octrode™ cylindrical and an S-series™ slim paddle, using the Epiducer™ system (St Jude Medical) 9 years earlier, with a subsequent intrathecal baclofen pump installed 1 year after SCS. Initially, these interventions stabilized the patient's pain symptoms. However, the diminishing effectiveness of SCS, coupled with a decrease in battery life and increased opioid consumption, necessitated recent surgical procedures. These included the removal and replacement of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) and leads to improve pain management and ensure MRI compatibility. During the removal of the S-series™ slim paddle type lead, complications arose, leading to the retention of an electrode fragment, which necessitated abandoning the replacement of both the IPG and lead. Post-surgical assessments revealed no new neurological impairments, and imaging studies confirmed the stable position of the retained fragment. The patient was discharged with a continued comprehensive pain management plan.

Conclusion: This case highlights the challenges and risks of percutaneous removal of slim paddle type leads, emphasizing the need for careful procedural planning and consideration of surgical options to avoid complications. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term durability and removal risks of various SCS lead types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信