{"title":"脑卒中患者额叶评估测验日文版的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Katsuya Sakai, Yuichiro Hosoi, Yusuke Harada, Kenji Morikawa, Yuichi Kato","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16050081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), which is used to assess executive function, has been translated into several languages and shown to be valid and reliable. However, the validity and reliability of the Japanese version in patients with stroke are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAB in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Japanese version of the FAB for dementia was modified and evaluated in 52 patients with stroke. FAB measurements were obtained twice over a 10-day period. Convergent validity was assessed using the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT) and the Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha (Cα). Test-retest evaluations were performed using intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2.1)] measurements, and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using the total FAB score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total FAB score was 13.4 ± 2.8 points, the ICC (2.1) was 0.856, and Cα was 0.92. The total FAB score was correlated with SCWT scores for parts I through IV (r = 0.70 to 0.77) and the TMT score for part B (ρ = -0.53). The LOA were -1.7 to 2.9 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Japanese version of the FAB had higher validity and reliability in patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 5","pages":"1086-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in Patients with Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Katsuya Sakai, Yuichiro Hosoi, Yusuke Harada, Kenji Morikawa, Yuichi Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurolint16050081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), which is used to assess executive function, has been translated into several languages and shown to be valid and reliable. However, the validity and reliability of the Japanese version in patients with stroke are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAB in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Japanese version of the FAB for dementia was modified and evaluated in 52 patients with stroke. FAB measurements were obtained twice over a 10-day period. Convergent validity was assessed using the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT) and the Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha (Cα). Test-retest evaluations were performed using intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2.1)] measurements, and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using the total FAB score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total FAB score was 13.4 ± 2.8 points, the ICC (2.1) was 0.856, and Cα was 0.92. The total FAB score was correlated with SCWT scores for parts I through IV (r = 0.70 to 0.77) and the TMT score for part B (ρ = -0.53). The LOA were -1.7 to 2.9 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Japanese version of the FAB had higher validity and reliability in patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology International\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"1086-1093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16050081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16050081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：用于评估执行功能的额叶评估测验（Frontal Assessment Battery，FAB）已被翻译成多种语言，并被证明是有效和可靠的。然而，日语版本在脑卒中患者中的有效性和可靠性尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查日语版 FAB 在脑卒中患者中的有效性和可靠性：方法：对痴呆 FAB 日语版进行了修改，并在 52 名脑卒中患者中进行了评估。在 10 天内进行了两次 FAB 测量。采用 Cronbach's alpha (Cα)测量内部一致性。使用类内相关系数[ICC (2.1)]测量进行重测评估，并使用 FAB 总分计算一致性限值（LOA）：FAB 总分的平均值为 13.4 ± 2.8 分，ICC (2.1) 为 0.856，Cα 为 0.92。FAB 总分与第一至第四部分的 SCWT 分数相关（r = 0.70 至 0.77），与 B 部分的 TMT 分数相关（ρ = -0.53）。LOA为-1.7至2.9分：结论：日文版 FAB 在脑卒中患者中具有更高的有效性和可靠性。
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery in Patients with Stroke.
Background: The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), which is used to assess executive function, has been translated into several languages and shown to be valid and reliable. However, the validity and reliability of the Japanese version in patients with stroke are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAB in patients with stroke.
Methods: The Japanese version of the FAB for dementia was modified and evaluated in 52 patients with stroke. FAB measurements were obtained twice over a 10-day period. Convergent validity was assessed using the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT) and the Trail Making Test (TMT) part B. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha (Cα). Test-retest evaluations were performed using intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2.1)] measurements, and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using the total FAB score.
Results: The mean total FAB score was 13.4 ± 2.8 points, the ICC (2.1) was 0.856, and Cα was 0.92. The total FAB score was correlated with SCWT scores for parts I through IV (r = 0.70 to 0.77) and the TMT score for part B (ρ = -0.53). The LOA were -1.7 to 2.9 points.
Conclusions: The Japanese version of the FAB had higher validity and reliability in patients with stroke.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
