Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou
{"title":"正中神经电刺激诱发的急性创伤性昏迷唤醒:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ<sup>2</sup> test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"817-828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Traumatic Coma Awakening Induced by Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ<sup>2</sup> test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"817-828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute Traumatic Coma Awakening Induced by Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ2 test and I2 test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.
期刊介绍:
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.