正中神经电刺激诱发的急性创伤性昏迷唤醒:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9
Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou
{"title":"正中神经电刺激诱发的急性创伤性昏迷唤醒:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ<sup>2</sup> test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"817-828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Traumatic Coma Awakening Induced by Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jinkun Yang, Xijuan Li, Xueping Yang, Tao Zhu, Shan Ou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ<sup>2</sup> test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"817-828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)被公认为导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。优化昏迷后的恢复是改善患者预后的首要任务。最近,越来越多的研究表明,正中神经电刺激(MNES)可能是治疗因创伤性脑损伤而苏醒的昏迷患者的一种潜在方法,但这些研究的结果并不一致。本研究旨在根据随机对照试验的数据,评估正中神经电刺激对创伤性脑损伤患者从昏迷中苏醒的影响。本研究使用特定关键词对 PubMed、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和中国国家知识基础设施电子数据库进行了系统检索,检索期从开始至 2023 年 7 月。采用χ2检验和I2检验来评估这些研究的异质性。在分析连续性结果和二元性结果时,分别采用了带 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的平均差和带 95% 置信区间的相对风险 (RR)。本次荟萃分析共纳入了来自 18 项研究的 1831 名患者。治疗后,MNES 组与对照组恢复意识的患者比例存在明显差异(RR 1.36,95% CI 1.18-1.56;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Traumatic Coma Awakening Induced by Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widely recognized as a major cause of death and disability. Optimizing recovery from coma is a priority for improving patient prognosis. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) may be a potential approach for comatose patients awakening with TBI, although the results of these studies are not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the MNES on recovery from coma in patients with TBI based on data from randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 2023 using specific keywords. The χ2 test and I2 test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across these studies. The mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were adopted to analyze the continuous outcomes and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1831 patients from 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the proportions of patients who regained consciousness between the MNES group and the control group after treatment (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56; P < 0.001) and at 6 months after injury (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.47; P < 0.001). MNES significantly improved the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean difference 2.38, 95% CI 1.78-2.98; P < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences in complications between the two groups of patients were observed, including pneumonitis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03; P = 0.107), seizures (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.49-3.10; P = 0.651), or gastric hemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.93; P = 0.795).The results of the present study indicate that patients with TBI in the MNES group recovered from coma more rapidly after treatment and at 6 months after injury. These results suggest that MNES is an effective approach for coma awakening after TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信