机器人活体右肝切除术的学习曲线:两家专科中心的疗效分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yee L Cheah, Hye Yeon Yang, Caroline J Simon, Mohamed E Akoad, Ashton A Connor, Despoina Daskalaki, Dai Hoon Han, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Jae K Kim, Maureen A Tellier, R Mark Ghobrial, A Osama Gaber, Gi Hong Choi
{"title":"机器人活体右肝切除术的学习曲线:两家专科中心的疗效分析。","authors":"Yee L Cheah, Hye Yeon Yang, Caroline J Simon, Mohamed E Akoad, Ashton A Connor, Despoina Daskalaki, Dai Hoon Han, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Jae K Kim, Maureen A Tellier, R Mark Ghobrial, A Osama Gaber, Gi Hong Choi","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive option for living donor hepatectomy. Currently, there are no studies on the learning curve of robotic donor hepatectomy. Thus, we evaluated the learning curve for robotic donor right hepatectomy (RH). We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive living donors who underwent robotic hepatectomy at two specialized centers between 2016 and 2022. We estimated the number of cases required to achieve stable operating times for robotic donor RH using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The complication rates were similar between the two centers (22.8% vs. 26.7%; p=0.74). Most complications were graded as minor (70.4%). Analysis of the total operative time demonstrated that the learning curves reached a peak at the 17th case in Center 1 and the 9th case in Center 2. The average operation times for cases 1-17 versus 18-99 in Center 1 were 603 versus 438 minutes (p<0.001), and cases 1-9 versus 10-15 in Center 2 were 532 versus 418 minutes (p=0.002). Complication rates were lower after the learning curves were achieved, although this did not reach statistical significance. A comparison of outcomes between centers suggests that a standardized approach to this complex operation can be successfully transferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in two specialized centers.\",\"authors\":\"Yee L Cheah, Hye Yeon Yang, Caroline J Simon, Mohamed E Akoad, Ashton A Connor, Despoina Daskalaki, Dai Hoon Han, Elizabeth W Brombosz, Jae K Kim, Maureen A Tellier, R Mark Ghobrial, A Osama Gaber, Gi Hong Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robotic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive option for living donor hepatectomy. Currently, there are no studies on the learning curve of robotic donor hepatectomy. Thus, we evaluated the learning curve for robotic donor right hepatectomy (RH). We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive living donors who underwent robotic hepatectomy at two specialized centers between 2016 and 2022. We estimated the number of cases required to achieve stable operating times for robotic donor RH using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The complication rates were similar between the two centers (22.8% vs. 26.7%; p=0.74). Most complications were graded as minor (70.4%). Analysis of the total operative time demonstrated that the learning curves reached a peak at the 17th case in Center 1 and the 9th case in Center 2. The average operation times for cases 1-17 versus 18-99 in Center 1 were 603 versus 438 minutes (p<0.001), and cases 1-9 versus 10-15 in Center 2 were 532 versus 418 minutes (p=0.002). Complication rates were lower after the learning curves were achieved, although this did not reach statistical significance. A comparison of outcomes between centers suggests that a standardized approach to this complex operation can be successfully transferred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人手术是一种新兴的微创活体肝切除术。目前,还没有关于机器人供体肝切除术学习曲线的研究。因此,我们评估了机器人供体右肝切除术(RH)的学习曲线。我们回顾性审查了前瞻性收集的数据,这些数据来自 2016 年至 2022 年期间在两个专业中心接受机器人肝切除术的连续活体供体。我们采用累积总和(CUSUM)分析法估算了机器人供体肝切除术达到稳定手术时间所需的病例数。两个中心的并发症发生率相似(22.8% 对 26.7%;P=0.74)。大多数并发症被评为轻微并发症(70.4%)。对总手术时间的分析表明,学习曲线在第一中心的第17例和第二中心的第9例达到顶峰。第 1 中心第 1-17 例与第 18-99 例的平均手术时间分别为 603 分钟与 438 分钟(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in two specialized centers.

Robotic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive option for living donor hepatectomy. Currently, there are no studies on the learning curve of robotic donor hepatectomy. Thus, we evaluated the learning curve for robotic donor right hepatectomy (RH). We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive living donors who underwent robotic hepatectomy at two specialized centers between 2016 and 2022. We estimated the number of cases required to achieve stable operating times for robotic donor RH using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The complication rates were similar between the two centers (22.8% vs. 26.7%; p=0.74). Most complications were graded as minor (70.4%). Analysis of the total operative time demonstrated that the learning curves reached a peak at the 17th case in Center 1 and the 9th case in Center 2. The average operation times for cases 1-17 versus 18-99 in Center 1 were 603 versus 438 minutes (p<0.001), and cases 1-9 versus 10-15 in Center 2 were 532 versus 418 minutes (p=0.002). Complication rates were lower after the learning curves were achieved, although this did not reach statistical significance. A comparison of outcomes between centers suggests that a standardized approach to this complex operation can be successfully transferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信