就支持阿片类药物使用障碍患者住院后护理过渡的策略达成共识:改良德尔菲过程。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09108-8
Noa Krawczyk, Megan Miller, Honora Englander, Bianca D Rivera, Daniel Schatz, Ji Chang, Magdalena Cerdá, Carolyn Berry, Jennifer McNeely
{"title":"就支持阿片类药物使用障碍患者住院后护理过渡的策略达成共识:改良德尔菲过程。","authors":"Noa Krawczyk, Megan Miller, Honora Englander, Bianca D Rivera, Daniel Schatz, Ji Chang, Magdalena Cerdá, Carolyn Berry, Jennifer McNeely","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09108-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite proliferation of acute-care interventions to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), significant challenges remain to supporting care continuity following discharge. Research is needed to inform effective hospital strategies to support patient transitions to ongoing MOUD in the community.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To inform a taxonomy of care transition strategies to support MOUD continuity from hospital to community-based settings and assess their perceived impact and feasibility among experts in the field.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi consensus process through three rounds of electronic surveys.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Experts in hospital-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, care transitions, and hospital-based addiction treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Delphi participants rated the impact and feasibility of 14 OUD care transition strategies derived from a review of the scientific literature on a scale from 1 to 9 over three survey rounds. Panelists were invited to suggest additional care transition strategies. Agreement level was calculated based on proportion of ratings within three points of the median.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Forty-five of 71 invited panelists participated in the survey. Agreement on impact was strong for 12 items and moderate for 10. Agreement on feasibility was strong for 11 items, moderate for 7, and poor for 4. Strategies with highest ratings on impact and feasibility included initiation of MOUD in-hospital and provision of buprenorphine prescriptions or medications before discharge. All original 14 strategies and 8 additional strategies proposed by panelists were considered medium- or high-impact and were incorporated into a final taxonomy of 22 OUD care transition strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study established expert consensus on impactful and feasible hospital strategies to support OUD care transitions from the hospital to community-based MOUD treatment, an area with little empirical research thus far. It is the hope that this taxonomy serves as a stepping-stone for future evaluations and clinical practice implementation toward improved MOUD continuity and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1048-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Consensus on Strategies to Support Opioid Use Disorder Care Transitions Following Hospitalization: A Modified Delphi Process.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Krawczyk, Megan Miller, Honora Englander, Bianca D Rivera, Daniel Schatz, Ji Chang, Magdalena Cerdá, Carolyn Berry, Jennifer McNeely\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09108-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite proliferation of acute-care interventions to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), significant challenges remain to supporting care continuity following discharge. Research is needed to inform effective hospital strategies to support patient transitions to ongoing MOUD in the community.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To inform a taxonomy of care transition strategies to support MOUD continuity from hospital to community-based settings and assess their perceived impact and feasibility among experts in the field.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi consensus process through three rounds of electronic surveys.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Experts in hospital-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, care transitions, and hospital-based addiction treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Delphi participants rated the impact and feasibility of 14 OUD care transition strategies derived from a review of the scientific literature on a scale from 1 to 9 over three survey rounds. Panelists were invited to suggest additional care transition strategies. Agreement level was calculated based on proportion of ratings within three points of the median.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Forty-five of 71 invited panelists participated in the survey. Agreement on impact was strong for 12 items and moderate for 10. Agreement on feasibility was strong for 11 items, moderate for 7, and poor for 4. Strategies with highest ratings on impact and feasibility included initiation of MOUD in-hospital and provision of buprenorphine prescriptions or medications before discharge. All original 14 strategies and 8 additional strategies proposed by panelists were considered medium- or high-impact and were incorporated into a final taxonomy of 22 OUD care transition strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study established expert consensus on impactful and feasible hospital strategies to support OUD care transitions from the hospital to community-based MOUD treatment, an area with little empirical research thus far. It is the hope that this taxonomy serves as a stepping-stone for future evaluations and clinical practice implementation toward improved MOUD continuity and health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1048-1058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09108-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09108-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管针对阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的急症护理干预措施层出不穷,但在支持出院后护理的连续性方面仍面临巨大挑战。需要开展研究,为医院制定有效的策略提供信息,以支持患者在社区继续接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗:为支持从医院到社区环境的 MOUD 连续性的护理过渡策略提供分类信息,并评估该领域专家对其影响和可行性的看法:设计:通过三轮电子调查达成改良德尔菲共识过程:参与人员:医院阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD) 治疗、护理过渡和医院成瘾治疗领域的专家:德尔菲法参与者在三轮调查中对科学文献综述中得出的 14 项 OUD 护理过渡策略的影响和可行性进行评分,评分标准从 1 到 9 分不等。小组成员受邀提出其他护理过渡策略建议。主要结果:71 位受邀专家中有 45 位提出了其他护理过渡策略建议:71 位受邀专家组成员中有 45 位参与了调查。有 12 个项目在影响方面达成了高度一致,10 个项目在中等程度上达成了一致。在可行性方面,有 11 个项目的一致性较强,7 个项目的一致性中等,4 个项目的一致性较差。影响和可行性评分最高的策略包括在医院内启动 MOUD 和在出院前提供丁丙诺啡处方或药物。所有最初的 14 项策略和专家小组成员提出的 8 项额外策略都被认为具有中等或较高影响力,并被纳入 22 项 OUD 护理过渡策略的最终分类中:我们的研究就支持从医院到社区 MOUD 治疗的 OUD 护理过渡的具有影响力和可行性的医院策略达成了专家共识,而这一领域迄今为止还鲜有实证研究。希望该分类法能成为未来评估和临床实践的基石,以改善 MOUD 的连续性和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Consensus on Strategies to Support Opioid Use Disorder Care Transitions Following Hospitalization: A Modified Delphi Process.

Background: Despite proliferation of acute-care interventions to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), significant challenges remain to supporting care continuity following discharge. Research is needed to inform effective hospital strategies to support patient transitions to ongoing MOUD in the community.

Objective: To inform a taxonomy of care transition strategies to support MOUD continuity from hospital to community-based settings and assess their perceived impact and feasibility among experts in the field.

Design: A modified Delphi consensus process through three rounds of electronic surveys.

Participants: Experts in hospital-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, care transitions, and hospital-based addiction treatment.

Main measures: Delphi participants rated the impact and feasibility of 14 OUD care transition strategies derived from a review of the scientific literature on a scale from 1 to 9 over three survey rounds. Panelists were invited to suggest additional care transition strategies. Agreement level was calculated based on proportion of ratings within three points of the median.

Key results: Forty-five of 71 invited panelists participated in the survey. Agreement on impact was strong for 12 items and moderate for 10. Agreement on feasibility was strong for 11 items, moderate for 7, and poor for 4. Strategies with highest ratings on impact and feasibility included initiation of MOUD in-hospital and provision of buprenorphine prescriptions or medications before discharge. All original 14 strategies and 8 additional strategies proposed by panelists were considered medium- or high-impact and were incorporated into a final taxonomy of 22 OUD care transition strategies.

Conclusions: Our study established expert consensus on impactful and feasible hospital strategies to support OUD care transitions from the hospital to community-based MOUD treatment, an area with little empirical research thus far. It is the hope that this taxonomy serves as a stepping-stone for future evaluations and clinical practice implementation toward improved MOUD continuity and health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信