对 Measure Dx 的评估,这是一种加快诊断安全学习和改进的资源。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09132-8
Andrea Bradford, Alberta Tran, Kisha J Ali, Alexis Offner, Christine Goeschel, Umber Shahid, Melissa Eckroade, Hardeep Singh
{"title":"对 Measure Dx 的评估,这是一种加快诊断安全学习和改进的资源。","authors":"Andrea Bradford, Alberta Tran, Kisha J Ali, Alexis Offner, Christine Goeschel, Umber Shahid, Melissa Eckroade, Hardeep Singh","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09132-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several strategies have been developed to detect diagnostic errors for organizational learning and improvement. However, few health care organizations (HCOs) have integrated these strategies into routine operations. To address this gap, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality released \"Measure Dx: A Resource To Identify, Analyze, and Learn From Diagnostic Safety Events\" in 2022.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted an evaluation of Measure Dx to measure feasibility of implementation and effects on short-term and intermediate outcomes related to diagnostic safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Teams from 11 HCOs, primarily academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were asked to use Measure Dx over approximately 6 months and attend monthly virtual learning collaborative sessions to share and discuss approaches to measuring diagnostic safety.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Descriptive outcomes were gathered at the HCO level and included uptake of different case-finding strategies and the number of cases reviewed and confirmed to have diagnostic safety improvement opportunities. We collected information on organizational practices related to diagnostic safety at each HCO at baseline and at the conclusion of the project.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The 11 HCOs completed all requirements for the evaluation. Each of the four diagnostic safety case finding strategies outlined in Measure Dx were used by at least three HCOs. Across the cohort, participants reviewed 703 cases using a standardized data collection instrument. Of those cases, 224 (31.8%) were identified as diagnostic safety events with improvement opportunities. Unexpectedly, self-ratings on the checklist assessment declined for several organizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of Measure Dx can help accelerate implementation of systematic approaches to diagnostic error measurement and learning across a variety of HCOs, while potentially enabling HCOs to identify opportunities to improve diagnostic safety practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"782-789"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Measure Dx, a Resource to Accelerate Diagnostic Safety Learning and Improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Bradford, Alberta Tran, Kisha J Ali, Alexis Offner, Christine Goeschel, Umber Shahid, Melissa Eckroade, Hardeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09132-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several strategies have been developed to detect diagnostic errors for organizational learning and improvement. However, few health care organizations (HCOs) have integrated these strategies into routine operations. To address this gap, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality released \\\"Measure Dx: A Resource To Identify, Analyze, and Learn From Diagnostic Safety Events\\\" in 2022.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted an evaluation of Measure Dx to measure feasibility of implementation and effects on short-term and intermediate outcomes related to diagnostic safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Teams from 11 HCOs, primarily academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were asked to use Measure Dx over approximately 6 months and attend monthly virtual learning collaborative sessions to share and discuss approaches to measuring diagnostic safety.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Descriptive outcomes were gathered at the HCO level and included uptake of different case-finding strategies and the number of cases reviewed and confirmed to have diagnostic safety improvement opportunities. We collected information on organizational practices related to diagnostic safety at each HCO at baseline and at the conclusion of the project.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The 11 HCOs completed all requirements for the evaluation. Each of the four diagnostic safety case finding strategies outlined in Measure Dx were used by at least three HCOs. Across the cohort, participants reviewed 703 cases using a standardized data collection instrument. Of those cases, 224 (31.8%) were identified as diagnostic safety events with improvement opportunities. Unexpectedly, self-ratings on the checklist assessment declined for several organizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of Measure Dx can help accelerate implementation of systematic approaches to diagnostic error measurement and learning across a variety of HCOs, while potentially enabling HCOs to identify opportunities to improve diagnostic safety practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"782-789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09132-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09132-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前已开发出几种检测诊断错误的策略,用于组织学习和改进。然而,很少有医疗机构(HCOs)将这些策略纳入日常运作。为了弥补这一不足,医疗保健研究与质量局发布了 "Measure Dx:目标:我们对 Measure Dx 进行了评估,以衡量实施的可行性以及对诊断安全相关短期和中期结果的影响:设计:前瞻性观察研究:干预措施:干预措施:要求参与者在大约 6 个月内使用 Measure Dx,并参加每月一次的虚拟学习合作会议,分享和讨论衡量诊断安全性的方法:主要测量指标: 在 HCO 层面收集描述性结果,包括对不同病例查找策略的采用情况,以及经审核并确认有诊断安全性改进机会的病例数量。我们在基线和项目结束时收集了各医疗机构与诊断安全相关的组织实践信息:主要结果:11 家住院处完成了评估的所有要求。Measure Dx 中概述的四种诊断安全病例查找策略中的每一种都被至少三家 HCO 采用。在整个团队中,参与者使用标准化数据收集工具审查了 703 个病例。在这些病例中,有 224 例(31.8%)被确定为诊断安全事件,存在改进机会。出乎意料的是,有几家机构在核对表评估中的自我评分有所下降:Measure Dx 的使用有助于在各种医疗机构中加快实施诊断错误测量和学习的系统方法,同时有可能使医疗机构发现改进诊断安全实践的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Measure Dx, a Resource to Accelerate Diagnostic Safety Learning and Improvement.

Background: Several strategies have been developed to detect diagnostic errors for organizational learning and improvement. However, few health care organizations (HCOs) have integrated these strategies into routine operations. To address this gap, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality released "Measure Dx: A Resource To Identify, Analyze, and Learn From Diagnostic Safety Events" in 2022.

Objective: We conducted an evaluation of Measure Dx to measure feasibility of implementation and effects on short-term and intermediate outcomes related to diagnostic safety.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Participants: Teams from 11 HCOs, primarily academic medical centers.

Interventions: Participants were asked to use Measure Dx over approximately 6 months and attend monthly virtual learning collaborative sessions to share and discuss approaches to measuring diagnostic safety.

Main measures: Descriptive outcomes were gathered at the HCO level and included uptake of different case-finding strategies and the number of cases reviewed and confirmed to have diagnostic safety improvement opportunities. We collected information on organizational practices related to diagnostic safety at each HCO at baseline and at the conclusion of the project.

Key results: The 11 HCOs completed all requirements for the evaluation. Each of the four diagnostic safety case finding strategies outlined in Measure Dx were used by at least three HCOs. Across the cohort, participants reviewed 703 cases using a standardized data collection instrument. Of those cases, 224 (31.8%) were identified as diagnostic safety events with improvement opportunities. Unexpectedly, self-ratings on the checklist assessment declined for several organizations.

Conclusions: Use of Measure Dx can help accelerate implementation of systematic approaches to diagnostic error measurement and learning across a variety of HCOs, while potentially enabling HCOs to identify opportunities to improve diagnostic safety practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信