Alvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Azahara Ocaña, Rosa Sánchez-Mayoral, Emilia Cercenado
{"title":"头孢菌素药敏试验的实际效果:革兰氏阴性菌前瞻性多中心研究的启示。","authors":"Alvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Azahara Ocaña, Rosa Sánchez-Mayoral, Emilia Cercenado","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup>) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, 84 <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. and 224 <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup> Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD (<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria.\",\"authors\":\"Alvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Azahara Ocaña, Rosa Sánchez-Mayoral, Emilia Cercenado\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlae169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup>) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, 84 <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. and 224 <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup> Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD (<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"dlae169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria.
Objectives: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP®) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.
Methods: The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 84 Acinetobacter spp. and 224 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP® Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).
Results: A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP® BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP® BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP® BMD (Acinetobacter baumannii isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).
Conclusions: DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP® BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.