Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi
{"title":"帕多瓦预测评分与无症状患者在医院获得的近端和孤立远端深静脉血栓。","authors":"Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi","doi":"10.3390/hematolrep16040055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% <i>p</i> = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% <i>p</i> = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12829,"journal":{"name":"Hematology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Padua Prediction Score and Hospital-Acquired Proximal and Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Michelangelo Sartori, Miriam Fiocca, Mario Soldati, Laura Borgese, Elisabetta Favaretto, Benilde Cosmi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/hematolrep16040055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% <i>p</i> = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% <i>p</i> = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16040055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16040055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Padua Prediction Score and Hospital-Acquired Proximal and Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Patients.
Background: Hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of proximal lower limb DVT and isolated distal DVT (IDDVT) and their relationship to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) in acutely ill, hospitalized patients.
Methods: In a single-center cross-sectional study, all inpatients from medical departments with suspected lower-extremity DVT were evaluated with whole-leg ultrasonography during 183 days from 2016 to 2017.
Results: Among the 505 inpatients (age 78.0 ± 13.3, females 59.2%) from medical departments, 204 (40.2%) had PPS ≥ 4, but only 54.4% of them underwent pharmacological thrombo-prophylaxis. Whole-leg ultrasonography detected 47 proximal DVTs (9.3%) and 65 IDDVTs (12.8%). Proximal DVT prevalence was higher in patients with high PPS vs. those with low PPS (12.7% vs. 7.0% p = 0.029, respectively), whereas IDDVT prevalence was similar in patients with high and low PPS (14.7% vs. 11.6% p = 0.311, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the PPS was 0.62 ± 0.03 for all DVTs, 0.64 ± 0.04 for proximal DVTs, and 0.58 ± 0.04 for IDDVTs.
Conclusions: In hospitalized patients, IDDVT had similar prevalence regardless of PPS risk stratification. Adherence to thrombo-prophylaxis in patients was still far from optimal.