{"title":"美国配偶照料强度对心理健康的影响。","authors":"Jennifer A Ailshire, Maria Casanova","doi":"10.1002/hec.4908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the US, spouses are a major source of informal care for older adults and, therefore, key to the US national strategy to provide long-term care to the growing population of older adults. Understanding the mental health impacts of spousal caregiving is therefore critically important. Existing studies on the topic have often been limited by methodological limitations, and most overlook the role of caregiving intensity. In this study, we assess the impact of providing different intensities of caregiving to a spouse on mental health outcomes using data from the Health and Retirement Study. We address the endogeneity of the decision to provide different caregiving intensities using an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator adapted to handle multivalued treatments. We check the robustness of our estimates to the AIPW's identifying assumptions by re-estimating the model using a dynamic fixed effects estimator. We find strong evidence that becoming a caregiver is associated with worsened mental health outcomes for women, while the evidence for men is weaker. When disaggregating by caregiving intensity, we find that transitions into high-intensity caregiving lead to large increases in depression symptoms and the probability of exhibiting major depression for both men and women. The overall mental health impact of transiting into caregiving is driven almost exclusively by the negative impact of high-intensity caregiving, as transitions into low- and moderate-intensity caregiving are not associated with worsening mental health in most specifications. This study provides timely insights that can inform the targeting of long-term care policies and programs aimed at supporting family caregivers of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health impacts of spousal caregiving intensity in the US.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Ailshire, Maria Casanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.4908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the US, spouses are a major source of informal care for older adults and, therefore, key to the US national strategy to provide long-term care to the growing population of older adults. Understanding the mental health impacts of spousal caregiving is therefore critically important. Existing studies on the topic have often been limited by methodological limitations, and most overlook the role of caregiving intensity. In this study, we assess the impact of providing different intensities of caregiving to a spouse on mental health outcomes using data from the Health and Retirement Study. We address the endogeneity of the decision to provide different caregiving intensities using an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator adapted to handle multivalued treatments. We check the robustness of our estimates to the AIPW's identifying assumptions by re-estimating the model using a dynamic fixed effects estimator. We find strong evidence that becoming a caregiver is associated with worsened mental health outcomes for women, while the evidence for men is weaker. When disaggregating by caregiving intensity, we find that transitions into high-intensity caregiving lead to large increases in depression symptoms and the probability of exhibiting major depression for both men and women. The overall mental health impact of transiting into caregiving is driven almost exclusively by the negative impact of high-intensity caregiving, as transitions into low- and moderate-intensity caregiving are not associated with worsening mental health in most specifications. This study provides timely insights that can inform the targeting of long-term care policies and programs aimed at supporting family caregivers of older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4908\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在美国,配偶是老年人非正式护理的主要来源,因此也是美国为不断增长的老年人口提供长期护理的国家战略的关键。因此,了解配偶护理对心理健康的影响至关重要。现有的相关研究往往受到方法论的限制,而且大多数研究都忽略了护理强度的作用。在本研究中,我们利用健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study)的数据,评估了为配偶提供不同强度的护理对心理健康结果的影响。我们使用增强反向概率加权(AIPW)估计器来处理多值处理,从而解决了提供不同护理强度决策的内生性问题。我们使用动态固定效应估计器对模型进行了重新估计,从而检验了我们的估计结果对 AIPW 识别假设的稳健性。我们发现,有强有力的证据表明,女性成为照顾者与心理健康结果的恶化有关,而男性的证据则较弱。如果按照护理强度进行分类,我们会发现,无论是男性还是女性,过渡到高强度护理都会导致抑郁症状和表现出重度抑郁症的概率大幅上升。过渡到护理工作对心理健康的总体影响几乎完全由高强度护理工作的负面影响所驱动,因为在大多数规格中,过渡到低强度和中等强度护理工作与心理健康恶化无关。这项研究提供了及时的见解,可以为旨在支持老年人家庭照顾者的长期护理政策和计划的针对性提供参考。
Mental health impacts of spousal caregiving intensity in the US.
In the US, spouses are a major source of informal care for older adults and, therefore, key to the US national strategy to provide long-term care to the growing population of older adults. Understanding the mental health impacts of spousal caregiving is therefore critically important. Existing studies on the topic have often been limited by methodological limitations, and most overlook the role of caregiving intensity. In this study, we assess the impact of providing different intensities of caregiving to a spouse on mental health outcomes using data from the Health and Retirement Study. We address the endogeneity of the decision to provide different caregiving intensities using an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator adapted to handle multivalued treatments. We check the robustness of our estimates to the AIPW's identifying assumptions by re-estimating the model using a dynamic fixed effects estimator. We find strong evidence that becoming a caregiver is associated with worsened mental health outcomes for women, while the evidence for men is weaker. When disaggregating by caregiving intensity, we find that transitions into high-intensity caregiving lead to large increases in depression symptoms and the probability of exhibiting major depression for both men and women. The overall mental health impact of transiting into caregiving is driven almost exclusively by the negative impact of high-intensity caregiving, as transitions into low- and moderate-intensity caregiving are not associated with worsening mental health in most specifications. This study provides timely insights that can inform the targeting of long-term care policies and programs aimed at supporting family caregivers of older adults.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.