G H Bakker, B Setyono-Han, M S Henkelman, F H de Jong, S W Lamberts, P van der Schoot, J G Klijn
{"title":"抗黄体酮米非司酮(RU486)、黄体酮醋酸甲地孕酮、LHRH类似物布赛林与卵巢切除治疗大鼠乳腺肿瘤的比较","authors":"G H Bakker, B Setyono-Han, M S Henkelman, F H de Jong, S W Lamberts, P van der Schoot, J G Klijn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of the synthetic antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486) on growth of dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in female rats were investigated. Prophylactic treatment with mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day) for 3 weeks starting from the day of first DMBA injection resulted in a doubling of the average tumor latency period (81 +/- 16 days, n = 17 treated, versus 39 +/- 5 days, n = 75 controls; P less than 0.005) and was accompanied by a significant growth retardation as shown by lower body weight increments. A 3-week therapeutic treatment of rats bearing mammary tumors was performed by administration of different dosages of mifepristone (2.5, 10, or 40 mg/kg/day) or megestrol acetate (2.5 or 10 mg/kg/day), with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin (40 micrograms/kg/day), buserelin plus mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day), or by ovariectomy. The effects of treatment on tumor load, pituitary, adrenal and reproductive organ weights, steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors, and blood plasma hormone concentrations were investigated. Mifepristone and megestrol acetate treatment gave rise to inhibition of mammary tumor growth with all dosages studied, in which mifepristone was more potent than megestrol acetate (80%-90% vs 40% inhibition, P less than 0.01). In contrast, buserelin treatment and ovariectomy resulted not only in inhibition, but in tumor remission by about 50%. Combined treatment with buserelin and mifepristone gave the same tumor remission as resulted from ovariectomy or single treatment with buserelin. Estradiol-stimulated growth of the human mammary cancer MCF-7 cells in culture was fully abolished by mifepristone (3.6 X 10(-8) M) or tamoxifen (4 X 10(-8) M), whereas growth of MCF-7 cells under control incubation was not affected by either agent. Therefore, a direct inhibition of the growth of rat mammary tumor cells by mifepristone appears likely. Based on the effects of mifepristone on plasma hormone levels (increased: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone; unchanged: follicle-stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone), organ weights (increased: pituitary, ovaries, uterus; unchanged: adrenals) and steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors (decreased: estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor contents), the main mechanism of action is probably a direct antiprogestational effect at the level of the mammary tumor cells through occupancy of the progesterone receptor.</p>","PeriodicalId":9581,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reports","volume":"71 11","pages":"1021-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the actions of the antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486), the progestin megestrol acetate, the LHRH analog buserelin, and ovariectomy in treatment of rat mammary tumors.\",\"authors\":\"G H Bakker, B Setyono-Han, M S Henkelman, F H de Jong, S W Lamberts, P van der Schoot, J G Klijn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effects of the synthetic antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486) on growth of dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in female rats were investigated. Prophylactic treatment with mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day) for 3 weeks starting from the day of first DMBA injection resulted in a doubling of the average tumor latency period (81 +/- 16 days, n = 17 treated, versus 39 +/- 5 days, n = 75 controls; P less than 0.005) and was accompanied by a significant growth retardation as shown by lower body weight increments. A 3-week therapeutic treatment of rats bearing mammary tumors was performed by administration of different dosages of mifepristone (2.5, 10, or 40 mg/kg/day) or megestrol acetate (2.5 or 10 mg/kg/day), with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin (40 micrograms/kg/day), buserelin plus mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day), or by ovariectomy. The effects of treatment on tumor load, pituitary, adrenal and reproductive organ weights, steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors, and blood plasma hormone concentrations were investigated. Mifepristone and megestrol acetate treatment gave rise to inhibition of mammary tumor growth with all dosages studied, in which mifepristone was more potent than megestrol acetate (80%-90% vs 40% inhibition, P less than 0.01). In contrast, buserelin treatment and ovariectomy resulted not only in inhibition, but in tumor remission by about 50%. Combined treatment with buserelin and mifepristone gave the same tumor remission as resulted from ovariectomy or single treatment with buserelin. Estradiol-stimulated growth of the human mammary cancer MCF-7 cells in culture was fully abolished by mifepristone (3.6 X 10(-8) M) or tamoxifen (4 X 10(-8) M), whereas growth of MCF-7 cells under control incubation was not affected by either agent. Therefore, a direct inhibition of the growth of rat mammary tumor cells by mifepristone appears likely. Based on the effects of mifepristone on plasma hormone levels (increased: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone; unchanged: follicle-stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone), organ weights (increased: pituitary, ovaries, uterus; unchanged: adrenals) and steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors (decreased: estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor contents), the main mechanism of action is probably a direct antiprogestational effect at the level of the mammary tumor cells through occupancy of the progesterone receptor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reports\",\"volume\":\"71 11\",\"pages\":\"1021-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了合成抗黄体酮米非司酮(RU486)对二甲苯并蒽(DMBA)诱导的雌性大鼠乳腺肿瘤生长的影响。从首次注射DMBA之日起,预防性使用米非司酮(10mg /kg/天)治疗3周,平均肿瘤潜伏期延长一倍(治疗组为81 +/- 16天,n = 17,对照组为39 +/- 5天,n = 75);P < 0.005),并伴有显著的生长迟缓,表现为较低的体重增量。对乳腺肿瘤大鼠进行为期3周的治疗,给予不同剂量的米非司酮(2.5、10或40 mg/kg/天)或醋酸甲地孕酮(2.5或10 mg/kg/天),与促黄体激素释放激素激动剂布西林(40微克/kg/天)、布西林加米非司酮(10 mg/kg/天)或卵巢切除术。研究了治疗对肿瘤负荷、垂体、肾上腺和生殖器官重量、乳腺肿瘤类固醇受体含量和血浆激素浓度的影响。米非司酮联合醋酸甲地孕酮对乳腺肿瘤生长均有抑制作用,其中米非司酮的抑制作用强于醋酸甲地孕酮(80% ~ 90% vs 40%, P < 0.01)。相比之下,buserelin治疗和卵巢切除术不仅抑制了肿瘤,而且肿瘤缓解了约50%。布西林和米非司酮联合治疗的肿瘤缓解效果与卵巢切除术或布西林单独治疗的效果相同。雌二醇刺激培养的人乳腺癌MCF-7细胞的生长被米非司酮(3.6 X 10(-8) M)或他莫昔芬(4 X 10(-8) M)完全消除,而对照组MCF-7细胞的生长不受这两种药物的影响。因此,米非司酮可能直接抑制大鼠乳腺肿瘤细胞的生长。根据米非司酮对血浆激素水平的影响(增加:黄体生成素、雌二醇、黄体酮;不变:促卵泡激素、促肾上腺皮质激素、皮质酮)、器官重量(增加:垂体、卵巢、子宫;不变:肾上腺素)和乳腺肿瘤类固醇受体含量(降低:雌激素受体和孕激素受体含量),其主要作用机制可能是在乳腺肿瘤细胞水平上通过占用孕激素受体而产生直接的抗孕作用。
Comparison of the actions of the antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486), the progestin megestrol acetate, the LHRH analog buserelin, and ovariectomy in treatment of rat mammary tumors.
The effects of the synthetic antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486) on growth of dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in female rats were investigated. Prophylactic treatment with mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day) for 3 weeks starting from the day of first DMBA injection resulted in a doubling of the average tumor latency period (81 +/- 16 days, n = 17 treated, versus 39 +/- 5 days, n = 75 controls; P less than 0.005) and was accompanied by a significant growth retardation as shown by lower body weight increments. A 3-week therapeutic treatment of rats bearing mammary tumors was performed by administration of different dosages of mifepristone (2.5, 10, or 40 mg/kg/day) or megestrol acetate (2.5 or 10 mg/kg/day), with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin (40 micrograms/kg/day), buserelin plus mifepristone (10 mg/kg/day), or by ovariectomy. The effects of treatment on tumor load, pituitary, adrenal and reproductive organ weights, steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors, and blood plasma hormone concentrations were investigated. Mifepristone and megestrol acetate treatment gave rise to inhibition of mammary tumor growth with all dosages studied, in which mifepristone was more potent than megestrol acetate (80%-90% vs 40% inhibition, P less than 0.01). In contrast, buserelin treatment and ovariectomy resulted not only in inhibition, but in tumor remission by about 50%. Combined treatment with buserelin and mifepristone gave the same tumor remission as resulted from ovariectomy or single treatment with buserelin. Estradiol-stimulated growth of the human mammary cancer MCF-7 cells in culture was fully abolished by mifepristone (3.6 X 10(-8) M) or tamoxifen (4 X 10(-8) M), whereas growth of MCF-7 cells under control incubation was not affected by either agent. Therefore, a direct inhibition of the growth of rat mammary tumor cells by mifepristone appears likely. Based on the effects of mifepristone on plasma hormone levels (increased: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone; unchanged: follicle-stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticosterone), organ weights (increased: pituitary, ovaries, uterus; unchanged: adrenals) and steroid receptor contents of mammary tumors (decreased: estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor contents), the main mechanism of action is probably a direct antiprogestational effect at the level of the mammary tumor cells through occupancy of the progesterone receptor.