钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂治疗慢性肾病的成本效益:系统综述。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anh Thi Ngoc Toan, Toi Lam Phung, Thao Thi Dang, Matthew James Alcusky, Daniel J Amante, Hoa L Nguyen, Robert J Goldberg
{"title":"钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂治疗慢性肾病的成本效益:系统综述。","authors":"Anh Thi Ngoc Toan, Toi Lam Phung, Thao Thi Dang, Matthew James Alcusky, Daniel J Amante, Hoa L Nguyen, Robert J Goldberg","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), Canagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), and Dapagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Anh Thi Ngoc Toan, Toi Lam Phung, Thao Thi Dang, Matthew James Alcusky, Daniel J Amante, Hoa L Nguyen, Robert J Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), Canagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), and Dapagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:慢性肾脏病(CKD)是一种严重的渐进性疾病,对经济造成重大负担。我们对钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 (SGLT2) 抑制剂治疗 CKD 的成本效益进行了系统性回顾评估:我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、INAHTA、NHS EED 和相关网站上进行了全面检索。两名审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要、提取数据,并使用 CHEERS 2022 和菲利普斯检查表评估研究质量:13项基于模型的成本效用研究符合纳入标准,分别评估了恩格列净(n = 3)、卡那格列净(n = 3)和达帕格列净(n = 8)。在CKD患者中,无论是否患有2型糖尿病(T2D),Empagliflozin或Dapagliflozin联合标准护理(SoC)比单独使用SoC更具成本效益。在高收入国家,从卫生系统的角度来看,对于患有 T2D 的 CKD 患者,SGLT2 抑制剂联合 SoC 可节省成本,而与 Canagliflozin 相比,Dapagliflozin 则不具成本效益。没有一项研究符合CHEERS 2022核对表的所有标准,大多数研究也不完全符合菲利普斯的经济模型核对表:结论:在SoC中加入SGLT2抑制剂可节省治疗T2D CKD患者的成本,对有或没有T2D的CKD患者来说都具有成本效益:该综述方案已在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为 CRD42023469005。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.

Results: Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (n = 3), Canagliflozin (n = 3), and Dapagliflozin (n = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.

Conclusion: Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.

Registration: The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信