Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Virginia Solitano, Yuhong Yuan, Neeraj Narula, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Florian Rieder, Vipul Jairath
{"title":"炎症性肠病和永久性回肠造口术患者的辅助护理干预措施:系统回顾。","authors":"Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Virginia Solitano, Yuhong Yuan, Neeraj Narula, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Florian Rieder, Vipul Jairath","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence for the management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy (PI) is limited. We aimed to summarize the interventional studies related to the provision of adjunctive ostomy care in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 5, 2024. Eligible studies were non-randomized or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or comparative cohort studies predominantly recruiting participants with CD and/or ulcerative colitis (UC) with PI assessing interventions for the management of high stoma output, disease recurrence, peristomal skin care, pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health support, and diet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3217 records, 6 were eligible and all were RCTs (<i>n</i> = 95). Out of these, 5 adopted a crossover design, and 1 study was a double-blind parallel-group RCT. All except 1 were published more than 20 years ago (1976-2003). Two studies exclusively included patients with UC, one included CD, and the remaining included both UC and CD. Four studies assessed pharmacological interventions (loperamide, 5-aminosalysilate [5-ASA], azodisal sodium, and budesonide), one assessed oral supplement with different osmolarities, and one assessed dietary intervention (unrefined vs refined carbohydrate). A decrease in ileostomy output was the primary outcome of interest in 4 studies. None of the studies assessed interventions for peristomal skin care, quality of life, stoma pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health, or CD recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that the evidence base to inform care for patients with IBD and PI is almost non-existent. There is an urgent need for focused research in this area to inform evidence-based treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"6 4","pages":"otae056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Virginia Solitano, Yuhong Yuan, Neeraj Narula, Siddharth Singh, Christopher Ma, Florian Rieder, Vipul Jairath\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence for the management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy (PI) is limited. We aimed to summarize the interventional studies related to the provision of adjunctive ostomy care in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 5, 2024. Eligible studies were non-randomized or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or comparative cohort studies predominantly recruiting participants with CD and/or ulcerative colitis (UC) with PI assessing interventions for the management of high stoma output, disease recurrence, peristomal skin care, pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health support, and diet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3217 records, 6 were eligible and all were RCTs (<i>n</i> = 95). Out of these, 5 adopted a crossover design, and 1 study was a double-blind parallel-group RCT. All except 1 were published more than 20 years ago (1976-2003). Two studies exclusively included patients with UC, one included CD, and the remaining included both UC and CD. Four studies assessed pharmacological interventions (loperamide, 5-aminosalysilate [5-ASA], azodisal sodium, and budesonide), one assessed oral supplement with different osmolarities, and one assessed dietary intervention (unrefined vs refined carbohydrate). A decrease in ileostomy output was the primary outcome of interest in 4 studies. None of the studies assessed interventions for peristomal skin care, quality of life, stoma pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health, or CD recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that the evidence base to inform care for patients with IBD and PI is almost non-existent. There is an urgent need for focused research in this area to inform evidence-based treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"otae056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:治疗克罗恩病(CD)和永久性回肠造口术(PI)患者的证据有限。我们的目的是总结与该人群造口辅助护理相关的干预性研究:方法:检索了从开始到 2024 年 1 月 5 日的 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。符合条件的研究为非随机或随机对照试验(RCT),或主要招募 CD 和/或溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者参与的比较队列研究,PI 评估了造口排出量高、疾病复发、造口周围皮肤护理、置袋系统、行为干预、心理健康支持和饮食等方面的干预措施:在 3217 份记录中,有 6 份符合条件,均为 RCT(n = 95)。其中,5 项采用了交叉设计,1 项为双盲平行组 RCT 研究。除 1 项研究外,其他研究均发表于 20 多年前(1976-2003 年)。其中两项研究只纳入了 UC 患者,一项研究纳入了 CD 患者,其余研究同时纳入了 UC 和 CD 患者。四项研究评估了药物干预(洛哌丁胺、5-氨基水杨酸[5-ASA]、偶氮二钠和布地奈德),一项研究评估了不同渗透压的口服补充剂,一项研究评估了饮食干预(未精制碳水化合物与精制碳水化合物)。4 项研究的主要结果是回肠造口术排出量减少。没有一项研究评估了对造口周围皮肤护理、生活质量、造口袋系统、行为干预、心理健康或 CD 复发的干预:本研究强调,为 IBD 和 PI 患者提供护理信息的证据基础几乎不存在。迫切需要在这一领域开展重点研究,为循证治疗决策提供依据。
Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review.
Background: The evidence for the management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy (PI) is limited. We aimed to summarize the interventional studies related to the provision of adjunctive ostomy care in this population.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 5, 2024. Eligible studies were non-randomized or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or comparative cohort studies predominantly recruiting participants with CD and/or ulcerative colitis (UC) with PI assessing interventions for the management of high stoma output, disease recurrence, peristomal skin care, pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health support, and diet.
Results: Out of 3217 records, 6 were eligible and all were RCTs (n = 95). Out of these, 5 adopted a crossover design, and 1 study was a double-blind parallel-group RCT. All except 1 were published more than 20 years ago (1976-2003). Two studies exclusively included patients with UC, one included CD, and the remaining included both UC and CD. Four studies assessed pharmacological interventions (loperamide, 5-aminosalysilate [5-ASA], azodisal sodium, and budesonide), one assessed oral supplement with different osmolarities, and one assessed dietary intervention (unrefined vs refined carbohydrate). A decrease in ileostomy output was the primary outcome of interest in 4 studies. None of the studies assessed interventions for peristomal skin care, quality of life, stoma pouching systems, behavioral interventions, mental health, or CD recurrence.
Conclusions: This study highlights that the evidence base to inform care for patients with IBD and PI is almost non-existent. There is an urgent need for focused research in this area to inform evidence-based treatment decisions.