芹菜素和木犀草素与 TP-53、pRb、APOBEC3H 和 HPV-16 E6 传统配体的分子对接比较:预防妇科恶性肿瘤的潜在临床应用。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Momir Dunjic, Stefano Turini, Lazar Nejkovic, Nenad Sulovic, Sasa Cvetkovic, Marija Dunjic, Katarina Dunjic, Dina Dolovac
{"title":"芹菜素和木犀草素与 TP-53、pRb、APOBEC3H 和 HPV-16 E6 传统配体的分子对接比较:预防妇科恶性肿瘤的潜在临床应用。","authors":"Momir Dunjic, Stefano Turini, Lazar Nejkovic, Nenad Sulovic, Sasa Cvetkovic, Marija Dunjic, Katarina Dunjic, Dina Dolovac","doi":"10.3390/cimb46100661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10839,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Momir Dunjic, Stefano Turini, Lazar Nejkovic, Nenad Sulovic, Sasa Cvetkovic, Marija Dunjic, Katarina Dunjic, Dina Dolovac\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cimb46100661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505693/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对分子对接数据进行了比较分析,重点是天然化合物芹菜素和木犀草素与蛋白质 TP-53、pRb 和 APOBEC 的结合相互作用,并与传统的药理配体进行了比较。研究采用了先进的生物信息学技术来评估和对比结合能,结果表明芹菜素和木犀草素与 TP-53、pRb 和 APOBEC 的亲和力明显更高,结合能分别为 -6.9 kcal/mol 和 -6.6 kcal/mol。这些数值表明,它们具有对 HPV-16 进行治疗干预的强大潜力。相比之下,传统配体的亲和力较低,能量在-4.5 至-5.5 kcal/mol之间。此外,还进行了蛋白质-蛋白质对接模拟,以评估 HPV-16 E6 肿瘤蛋白与肿瘤抑制因子 TP-53 和 pRb 之间的相互作用。应用转换公式将这些蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用能量转换为非蛋白质相互作用的可比能量,进一步强调了芹菜素和木犀草素的卓越结合潜力。这些发现凸显了这些天然化合物在预防 HPV-16 诱导的肿瘤发生方面的治疗前景,值得在临床应用中进一步进行实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies.

This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Current Issues in Molecular Biology 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
380
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Issues in Molecular Biology (CIMB) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing review articles and minireviews in all areas of molecular biology and microbiology. Submitted articles are subject to an Article Processing Charge (APC) and are open access immediately upon publication. All manuscripts undergo a peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信