实施单核细胞分布宽度 (MDW) 测量对急诊科脓毒症患者抗感染用药时间的临床影响:一项前后队列研究。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Marta Cancella de Abreu, Timothé Sala, Enfel Houas, Ilaria Cherubini, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater
{"title":"实施单核细胞分布宽度 (MDW) 测量对急诊科脓毒症患者抗感染用药时间的临床影响:一项前后队列研究。","authors":"Marta Cancella de Abreu, Timothé Sala, Enfel Houas, Ilaria Cherubini, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05141-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely recognition of sepsis in emergency department (ED) is challenging. We evaluated the impact of implementing the biomarker monocyte distribution width (MDW) at bedside, on the time to anti-infective administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a before-and-after cohort study in the ED of an academic hospital in Paris, to compare sepsis patients care and outcomes, before and after the implementation of point of care (POC) MDW measurement in the ED. During post-implementation period (period-2), MDW was measured with complete blood count by ED nurses with results given in 2 min: if above 21.5 units, ED physicians were asked to consider sepsis and to start an anti-infectious as soon as possible. Primary endpoint was time to anti-infectious administration (TTA) from ED arrival, and secondary endpoints were TTA from sepsis onset (TTAS), length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 255 patients (period-1) and 180 patients (period-2) with sepsis were included. The TTA was 5.4 h (3.5-7.7) period-1 and 4.9 h (IQR 2.5-7.1) in period-2 (p = 0.06). MDW implementation significantly reduced the median TTAS from to 3.7 h (IQR 1.5-5.8) in period-1, to 2.2 h (IQR 0.5-4.5) in period-2 (p < 0.001). Mortality rates remained similar between the two periods (18% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.4), as did hospitalization rates (93% vs. 91%, p = 0.4) and ED length of stay (7.2 h (5.3-9.8) vs 7.0 (5.4-9.4), p = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing POC MDW measurement in the ED protocols enhances the timeliness of anti-infective administration from sepsis onset, meeting current sepsis management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of the implementation of monocyte distribution width (MDW) measurement on time to anti-infective administration in sepsis patients in the emergency department: a before/after cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Cancella de Abreu, Timothé Sala, Enfel Houas, Ilaria Cherubini, Martin Larsen, Pierre Hausfater\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-024-05141-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely recognition of sepsis in emergency department (ED) is challenging. We evaluated the impact of implementing the biomarker monocyte distribution width (MDW) at bedside, on the time to anti-infective administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a before-and-after cohort study in the ED of an academic hospital in Paris, to compare sepsis patients care and outcomes, before and after the implementation of point of care (POC) MDW measurement in the ED. During post-implementation period (period-2), MDW was measured with complete blood count by ED nurses with results given in 2 min: if above 21.5 units, ED physicians were asked to consider sepsis and to start an anti-infectious as soon as possible. Primary endpoint was time to anti-infectious administration (TTA) from ED arrival, and secondary endpoints were TTA from sepsis onset (TTAS), length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 255 patients (period-1) and 180 patients (period-2) with sepsis were included. The TTA was 5.4 h (3.5-7.7) period-1 and 4.9 h (IQR 2.5-7.1) in period-2 (p = 0.06). MDW implementation significantly reduced the median TTAS from to 3.7 h (IQR 1.5-5.8) in period-1, to 2.2 h (IQR 0.5-4.5) in period-2 (p < 0.001). Mortality rates remained similar between the two periods (18% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.4), as did hospitalization rates (93% vs. 91%, p = 0.4) and ED length of stay (7.2 h (5.3-9.8) vs 7.0 (5.4-9.4), p = 0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing POC MDW measurement in the ED protocols enhances the timeliness of anti-infective administration from sepsis onset, meeting current sepsis management guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05141-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05141-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在急诊科(ED)及时识别败血症是一项挑战。我们评估了在床旁使用生物标志物单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)对抗感染用药时间的影响:我们在巴黎一家学术医院的急诊室开展了一项前后队列研究,以比较急诊室实施床旁生物标志物单核细胞分布宽度测量前后脓毒症患者的护理和治疗效果。在实施后(第二阶段),急诊室护士通过全血细胞计数测量 MDW,并在 2 分钟内给出结果:如果超过 21.5 个单位,急诊室医生会被要求考虑脓毒症并尽快开始抗感染治疗。主要终点是到达急诊室后开始抗感染治疗的时间(TTA),次要终点是脓毒症发病后开始抗感染治疗的时间(TTAS)、住院时间、死亡率和住院率:结果:共纳入 255 名败血症患者(第一阶段)和 180 名患者(第二阶段)。第一阶段的 TTA 为 5.4 小时(3.5-7.7),第二阶段为 4.9 小时(IQR 2.5-7.1)(p = 0.06)。实施 MDW 后,TTAS 的中位数从第一阶段的 3.7 小时(IQR 1.5-5.8)大幅降至第二阶段的 2.2 小时(IQR 0.5-4.5)(p 结论:MDW 的实施大大降低了 TTAS 的中位数:在急诊室方案中实施 POC MDW 测量可提高脓毒症发病后抗感染用药的及时性,符合当前的脓毒症管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical impact of the implementation of monocyte distribution width (MDW) measurement on time to anti-infective administration in sepsis patients in the emergency department: a before/after cohort study.

Background: Timely recognition of sepsis in emergency department (ED) is challenging. We evaluated the impact of implementing the biomarker monocyte distribution width (MDW) at bedside, on the time to anti-infective administration.

Methods: We conducted a before-and-after cohort study in the ED of an academic hospital in Paris, to compare sepsis patients care and outcomes, before and after the implementation of point of care (POC) MDW measurement in the ED. During post-implementation period (period-2), MDW was measured with complete blood count by ED nurses with results given in 2 min: if above 21.5 units, ED physicians were asked to consider sepsis and to start an anti-infectious as soon as possible. Primary endpoint was time to anti-infectious administration (TTA) from ED arrival, and secondary endpoints were TTA from sepsis onset (TTAS), length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization rates.

Results: In total, 255 patients (period-1) and 180 patients (period-2) with sepsis were included. The TTA was 5.4 h (3.5-7.7) period-1 and 4.9 h (IQR 2.5-7.1) in period-2 (p = 0.06). MDW implementation significantly reduced the median TTAS from to 3.7 h (IQR 1.5-5.8) in period-1, to 2.2 h (IQR 0.5-4.5) in period-2 (p < 0.001). Mortality rates remained similar between the two periods (18% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.4), as did hospitalization rates (93% vs. 91%, p = 0.4) and ED length of stay (7.2 h (5.3-9.8) vs 7.0 (5.4-9.4), p = 0.7).

Conclusion: Implementing POC MDW measurement in the ED protocols enhances the timeliness of anti-infective administration from sepsis onset, meeting current sepsis management guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信