表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌患者在奥希替尼治疗进展后的治疗模式和临床疗效。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Nathaniel D Robinson, Maureen E Canavan, Peter L Zhan, Brooks V Udelsman, Ranjan Pathak, Daniel J Boffa, Sarah B Goldberg
{"title":"表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌患者在奥希替尼治疗进展后的治疗模式和临床疗效。","authors":"Nathaniel D Robinson, Maureen E Canavan, Peter L Zhan, Brooks V Udelsman, Ranjan Pathak, Daniel J Boffa, Sarah B Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line osimertinib, the optimal second-line treatment regimen after progression is not known. We sought to assess practice patterns and evaluate the association between different therapies and survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC following progression on first-line osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of patients who received first-line treatment with osimertinib using a population-based, multicenter nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2373 patients who received first-line osimertinib. The majority (n = 2279) received osimertinib monotherapy. A total of 538 patients received first-line osimertinib and had second-line treatment data available. Second-line treatment regimens were varied: 65% (n = 348) included chemotherapy, 37% (n = 197) included an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and 44% (n = 234) included an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We then analyzed the 333 patients with performance status 0-2 who received chemotherapy with osimertinib (n = 107, 32%) versus chemotherapy without osimertinib (n = 226, 68%). The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS; median: 10.1 versus 5.9 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.68], P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median: 17.0 versus 12.8 months, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.44, 0.93], P = .018) compared to other chemotherapy approaches without osimertinib. This effect was most pronounced in patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following progression on osimertinib, a wide variety of treatment regimens were used. The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy in the second line was associated with increased PFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel D Robinson, Maureen E Canavan, Peter L Zhan, Brooks V Udelsman, Ranjan Pathak, Daniel J Boffa, Sarah B Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line osimertinib, the optimal second-line treatment regimen after progression is not known. We sought to assess practice patterns and evaluate the association between different therapies and survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC following progression on first-line osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of patients who received first-line treatment with osimertinib using a population-based, multicenter nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2373 patients who received first-line osimertinib. The majority (n = 2279) received osimertinib monotherapy. A total of 538 patients received first-line osimertinib and had second-line treatment data available. Second-line treatment regimens were varied: 65% (n = 348) included chemotherapy, 37% (n = 197) included an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and 44% (n = 234) included an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We then analyzed the 333 patients with performance status 0-2 who received chemotherapy with osimertinib (n = 107, 32%) versus chemotherapy without osimertinib (n = 226, 68%). The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS; median: 10.1 versus 5.9 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.68], P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median: 17.0 versus 12.8 months, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.44, 0.93], P = .018) compared to other chemotherapy approaches without osimertinib. This effect was most pronounced in patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following progression on osimertinib, a wide variety of treatment regimens were used. The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy in the second line was associated with increased PFS and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在一线奥希替尼治疗后病情进展,但进展后的最佳二线治疗方案尚不清楚。我们试图评估EGFR突变的NSCLC患者在一线奥希替尼治疗进展后的治疗模式,并评估不同疗法与生存期之间的关联:使用基于人群的多中心全国性电子健康记录衍生去标识数据库,对接受奥希替尼一线治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究:我们确定了2373名接受奥希替尼一线治疗的患者。大多数患者(n = 2279)接受了奥希替尼单药治疗。共有538名患者接受了奥希替尼一线治疗,并有二线治疗数据。二线治疗方案多种多样:65%(n = 348)采用化疗,37%(n = 197)采用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),44%(n = 234)采用表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)。然后,我们分析了333名表现状态为0-2的患者接受奥希替尼化疗(107人,32%)与不接受奥希替尼化疗(226人,68%)的对比情况。在化疗的同时继续使用奥希替尼可获得更好的无进展生存期(PFS,中位数为 10.1 对 5.9):中位数:10.1 个月对 5.9 个月,危险比 [HR]:0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]:[0.34,0.68],P < .001)和总生存期(OS;中位数:17.0 个月对 12.8 个月):17.0个月对12.8个月,HR:0.64,95% CI:[0.44,0.93],P = .018)。这种效应在表皮生长因子受体外显子19缺失的患者中最为明显:结论:奥希莫替尼治疗进展后,采用了多种治疗方案。结论:奥希莫替尼治疗进展后,采用了多种治疗方案,在二线治疗中继续使用奥希替尼并进行化疗与延长PFS和OS有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib.

Introduction: For patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line osimertinib, the optimal second-line treatment regimen after progression is not known. We sought to assess practice patterns and evaluate the association between different therapies and survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC following progression on first-line osimertinib.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who received first-line treatment with osimertinib using a population-based, multicenter nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database.

Results: We identified 2373 patients who received first-line osimertinib. The majority (n = 2279) received osimertinib monotherapy. A total of 538 patients received first-line osimertinib and had second-line treatment data available. Second-line treatment regimens were varied: 65% (n = 348) included chemotherapy, 37% (n = 197) included an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and 44% (n = 234) included an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We then analyzed the 333 patients with performance status 0-2 who received chemotherapy with osimertinib (n = 107, 32%) versus chemotherapy without osimertinib (n = 226, 68%). The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS; median: 10.1 versus 5.9 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.68], P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median: 17.0 versus 12.8 months, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.44, 0.93], P = .018) compared to other chemotherapy approaches without osimertinib. This effect was most pronounced in patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion.

Conclusions: Following progression on osimertinib, a wide variety of treatment regimens were used. The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy in the second line was associated with increased PFS and OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信